yorkie1999 Posted 11 March 2023 Posted 11 March 2023 26 minutes ago, cityfanlee23 said: How does the taxpayer subsidise illegal migration, illegal immigrants can’t claim benefits because they are illegal. You cannot claim anything until you are in the system. If they are in the system, they aren’t illegal. how can you not grasp this? You can claim a free 5 star hotel room. 1
cityfanlee23 Posted 11 March 2023 Posted 11 March 2023 Just now, yorkie1999 said: You can claim a free 5 star hotel room. That's not the fault of the migrants though is it? wtf is your point with this? It's the fault of your corrupt government. 1
yorkie1999 Posted 11 March 2023 Posted 11 March 2023 Just now, cityfanlee23 said: That's not the fault of the migrants though is it? wtf is your point with this? It's the fault of your corrupt government. Can’t you tell a quip? 1
purpleronnie Posted 11 March 2023 Posted 11 March 2023 (edited) 3 minutes ago, yorkie1999 said: You can claim a free 5 star hotel room. You think that illegal migrants are in hotels? edit....seems he was joking. Edited 11 March 2023 by purpleronnie 1
Parafox Posted 11 March 2023 Posted 11 March 2023 (edited) 3 minutes ago, cityfanlee23 said: It's always crazy when the money argument comes up. - Tax avoidance, hundreds of billions lost - Brexit, 40bn lost last year in tax revenue, which would be over 100bn in trade - Track and trace, billions - PPE scandals, billions - Liz truss and her lapdog, 30bn+ - Covid 19 fraud cases 15bn - 13 years of chronic underinvestment under the guise of "living within our means" - Record profits for energy wholesalers in one of the most blatant and disgusting corruptions in history whilst we pay the price Government: "LOOK, BOAT PEOPLE!" It's only because of the topic title that this hasn't been shut down yet I await the mods response... Edited 11 March 2023 by Parafox
yorkie1999 Posted 11 March 2023 Posted 11 March 2023 Just now, purpleronnie said: You know that illegal migrants are in hotels? You know they’re not?
cityfanlee23 Posted 11 March 2023 Posted 11 March 2023 Just now, yorkie1999 said: Can’t you tell a quip? Sorry, i've been reading through some of the comments on this thread and honestly it's becoming hard to tell who's serious or not, I'm dumbfounded by some of the illogical crap being spouted on here
purpleronnie Posted 11 March 2023 Posted 11 March 2023 Just now, yorkie1999 said: You know they’re not? You might be one...are you in a hotel?
cityfanlee23 Posted 11 March 2023 Posted 11 March 2023 1 minute ago, Parafox said: It's only because of the topic title that this hasn't been shut down yet I await the mods response... Yeah I went off on a tangent with that one Solidarity Garry
yorkie1999 Posted 11 March 2023 Posted 11 March 2023 Just now, cityfanlee23 said: Sorry, i've been reading through some of the comments on this thread and honestly it's becoming hard to tell who's serious or not, I'm dumbfounded by some of the illogical crap being spouted on here What I do know is that not one person on here can do anything about people migrating, so it’s pointless being serious. 1
yorkie1999 Posted 11 March 2023 Posted 11 March 2023 3 minutes ago, purpleronnie said: You might be one...are you in a hotel? Yes, in the next room to you.
purpleronnie Posted 11 March 2023 Posted 11 March 2023 Just now, yorkie1999 said: Yes, in the next room to you. Its nice here isn't it?
David Hankey Posted 11 March 2023 Posted 11 March 2023 48 minutes ago, Fox92 said: You’re always telling me how great the owners are, and yet here you are criticising a bloke who actually saved the club. 3) Post.You seem to be telling me he saved the Club single-handedly and we all know that is not true. He was part of a consortium. Irrespective of that, which is water under the bridge, it has nothing to do with his latest outspokenness. Or is it a case of being rich and famous he can say and do exactly as he likes? 1
yorkie1999 Posted 11 March 2023 Posted 11 March 2023 1 minute ago, purpleronnie said: Its nice here isn't it? No, it’s freezing and raining, and this country is full of moaning gits, I want to go back home but can’t get a boat out of here. 1
purpleronnie Posted 11 March 2023 Posted 11 March 2023 1 minute ago, yorkie1999 said: No, it’s freezing and raining, and this country is full of moaning gits, I want to go back home but can’t get a boat out of here. I meant the hotel.
yorkie1999 Posted 11 March 2023 Posted 11 March 2023 1 minute ago, purpleronnie said: I meant the hotel. Your room might be ok but there’s 16 of us in here
Super_horns Posted 11 March 2023 Posted 11 March 2023 Basically be like this but without the commentary? https://m.youtube.com/@skysportspremierleague/videos
Fox92 Posted 11 March 2023 Posted 11 March 2023 7 minutes ago, David Hankey said: 3) Post.You seem to be telling me he saved the Club single-handedly and we all know that is not true. He was part of a consortium. Irrespective of that, which is water under the bridge, it has nothing to do with his latest outspokenness. Or is it a case of being rich and famous he can say and do exactly as he likes? He was a big part of a consortium, probably the one with the most money. But that’s water under the bridge? Alright then. People can say what they like regardless of money and fame. 1
urban.spaceman Posted 11 March 2023 Posted 11 March 2023 I honestly loathe absolutely everything about this country at the minute. I want to be deported. Not even ****ing joking.
Tuna Posted 11 March 2023 Posted 11 March 2023 9 minutes ago, Fox92 said: He was a big part of a consortium, probably the one with the most money. But that’s water under the bridge? Alright then. People can say what they like regardless of money and fame. Definitely a big part, he led the press conference didn't he? Certainly the public face of it. Jon Holmes I think his name is, Lineker's agent was also part of it and was chairman? It was 20 years ago so can't remember exactly. Basically Gary was a huge part of the takeover. 2
Fazzer 7 Posted 11 March 2023 Posted 11 March 2023 The BBC would surely be within their rights to suspend or sack all those that went awol today in support of Lineker, and probably should, breach of contract. This is a dispute between Lineker and the beeb. 1
Tuna Posted 11 March 2023 Posted 11 March 2023 1 minute ago, Fazzer 7 said: The BBC would surely be within their rights to suspend or sack all those that went awol today in support of Lineker, and probably should, breach of contract. This is a dispute between Lineker and the beeb. That'll really calm things down 2
ClaphamFox Posted 11 March 2023 Posted 11 March 2023 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Fazzer 7 said: The BBC would surely be within their rights to suspend or sack all those that went awol today in support of Lineker, and probably should, breach of contract. This is a dispute between Lineker and the beeb. They won’t do that because what they want is for them all to return and everything to go back to normal. Besides, it would turn the situation into even more of a PR catastrophe than it already is. Edited 11 March 2023 by ClaphamFox
yorkie1999 Posted 11 March 2023 Posted 11 March 2023 1 minute ago, Tuna said: That'll really calm things down And we’ll end up with horsey chops balding commentating. Argh. The death of football is nigh.
MattFox Posted 11 March 2023 Posted 11 March 2023 8 minutes ago, Fazzer 7 said: The BBC would surely be within their rights to suspend or sack all those that went awol today in support of Lineker, and probably should, breach of contract. This is a dispute between Lineker and the beeb. And have literally nobody prepared to present a football program for then
Recommended Posts