Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
Nalis

Premier League Thread 2023/2024

By Nalis, in General Football and Sport

Recommended Posts

Guest Lcfc82

Guest Lcfc82

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, BKLFox said:

All the talk of Glad no VAR in Championship but what was the on field decision?

I can accept the on field officials getting the odd decision wrong.

grobyfox1990

grobyfox1990

Posted
Posted
38 minutes ago, whoareyaaa said:

I don't know how it can be a human error, every game you watch if there is a tight offside call they will draw lines, this wasn't even tight.

The human error is the Lino calling it offside right? And then var system clearly was just not working, therefore no lines drawn. That’s how I’ve interpreted the statement anyway. Similar to when in cricket DRS is not working 

grobyfox1990

grobyfox1990

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, Matt said:

Atleast it's happened to one of the top teams and getting plenty of air time, not simply swept under the carpet.

??? Wolves got denied a blatant pen at old Trafford and it got days of airtime and rightly so

  • Like 2
st albans fox

st albans fox

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, BKLFox said:

All the talk of Glad no VAR in Championship but what was the on field decision?

lino called offside
 

2 minutes ago, grobyfox1990 said:

The human error is the Lino calling it offside right? And then var system clearly was just not working, therefore no lines drawn. That’s how I’ve interpreted the statement anyway. Similar to when in cricket DRS is not working 

But it specifically states human error  - it doesn’t speak about tech error like the one at arsenal last season 

The Doctor

The Doctor

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Parafox said:

 

Doesn't make it right though, does it.

 

Look at it from our point of view. We'd be fuming.

I'm not saying its right? I'm saying that I enjoy it because **** that baseball capped berk and the professional victims

whoareyaaa

whoareyaaa

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, grobyfox1990 said:

The human error is the Lino calling it offside right? And then var system clearly was just not working, therefore no lines drawn. That’s how I’ve interpreted the statement anyway. Similar to when in cricket DRS is not working 

I think it didn’t even get to VAR match officials in field called it off but how was it not checked 

fox in the sox

fox in the sox

Posted
Posted

It may be that the technology was down and you have to stick with the original decision as in other sports. But they moved on so quickly, normally in cricket and tennis they have a good go at getting it working - and if that is the reason why was it not said during the match or at the end to let people know.

Samilktray

Samilktray

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, HybridFox said:

The amount of refereeing decisions Liverpool get, I have zero sympathy for them

Stuff like this is so weird because it’s a fundamental problem with the sport 

Soar Fox

Soar Fox

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, Bert said:

Wasn’t his decision though for the offside was it? Lino and VAR have done him there. 
 

I still can’t believe the Diaz goal tbh, even without the lines you could tell he was onside. 

The performance in general was bordering on corruption. Jota’s first yellow card for example 

grobyfox1990

grobyfox1990

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, st albans fox said:

lino called offside
 

But it specifically states human error  - it doesn’t speak about tech error like the one at arsenal last season 

 

8 minutes ago, whoareyaaa said:

I think it didn’t even get to VAR match officials in field called it off but how was it not checked 

Understood on both counts, thanks. So the human error was it not even being passed to var?!?! That is incredible if so. I love the drama of the PL though 

David Hankey

David Hankey

Posted
Posted

It'll be interesting to see now L'pool are getting the rough end of VAR what will happen.

 

Other Clubs, ourselves included, have been suffering for years.

  • Like 1
st albans fox

st albans fox

Posted
Posted
39 minutes ago, grobyfox1990 said:

 

Understood on both counts, thanks. So the human error was it not even being passed to var?!?! That is incredible if so. I love the drama of the PL though 

Afaik, the var decided that it wasn’t necessary to draw the lines because the offside was clear.  The offside decision is always reviewed by var but it’s their call if they decide lines need to be drawn 

  • Like 1
Danizen

Danizen

Posted
Posted

Is Pep losing his hunger?

 

They've lost two games in a row. That isn't that strange. What is strange is that after both games, he's come out and congratulated the other team and said they deserved it. He's normally notorious for only dishing out praise to teams he's just pumped 5-0.

Fear Of The Fox

Fear Of The Fox

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, st albans fox said:

Afaik, the var decided that it wasn’t necessary to draw the lines because the offside was clear.  The offside decision is always reviewed by var but it’s their call if they decide lines need to be drawn 

Judging by the PGMOL statement I don't think it happened this way. If that's the case eventually, everybody on the VAR must be investigated starting with their bank accounts. 

Tielemans63

Tielemans63

Posted
Posted (edited)

Sorry if already posted, but this is just ridiculous:

 

 The VAR guy said "check complete" because he thought the on-field decision was a goal. That's so amateurish

Edited by Tielemans63
  • Like 1
st albans fox

st albans fox

Posted
Posted (edited)
23 minutes ago, Fear Of The Fox said:

Judging by the PGMOL statement I don't think it happened this way. If that's the case eventually, everybody on the VAR must be investigated starting with their bank accounts. 

Yes - it’s even worse than I thought 

 

14 minutes ago, Tielemans63 said:

Sorry if already posted, but this is just ridiculous:

 

 The VAR guy said "check complete" because he thought the on-field decision was a goal. That's so amateurish

So why haven’t any of the three people in the var area stopped the restart to tell the ref that he needs to stop the game ?????  Even after the game has restarted they can stop it. It’s simply ludicrous 

 

apparently once the game re starts after a var check, it cannot be stopped to rectify an error by the officials. . This is just nonsense 

Edited by st albans fox
  • Like 1
Foxdiamond

Foxdiamond

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, st albans fox said:

Yes - it’s even worse than I thought 

 

So why haven’t any of the three people in the var area stopped the restart to tell the ref that he needs to stop the game ?????  Even after the game has restarted they can stop it. It’s simply ludicrous 

The Three Stooges

st albans fox

st albans fox

Posted
Posted (edited)

Sorry

villa won 6-1 but Xg was 1.49-1.76 ????  
 

that’s nuts 

 

mind you understat has villa at 1.91.    Luiz goal at the end has an Xg of 0.03 - that’s rubbish aswell. It’s an open goal. 0.03 says that only 1 in 33 opportunities of that chance are scored - garbage 

Edited by st albans fox
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...