Premier League 2025/26 Thread

[ramboacdc]

Really would love this to go to the last game and spurs stuff it. 

 

Gonna be more difficult now, but hope Leeds stuff them tomorrow and then Chelsea come out swinging after their FA cup loss

[Parafox]

11 minutes ago, jammie82uk said:

But VAR didn’t see that or show the referee that, they shown him flapping at the ball trying to catch it when every other time he has attempted to punch it away 

The decision to do whatever Raya chose to do in that situation makes no difference to the outcome.

[Parafox]

8 minutes ago, Leicesterpool said:

Premier League decided where the title was going in that decision, you could play the footage 100 times and still wouldn't see a foul. However VAR claim there "was a foul on the keeper". 

Utter crap.

[Leicesterpool]

Always seems strange that the bigger clubs always get the decisions when it comes to VAR. Goes in at the other its goal. Video Technology in other sports works great. Maybe it shows doesn't work in football or it's being used for the wrong reason. I'm sure in other sports like in cricket, if there is not enough evidence or conclusive, they stick with the original decision.  

[Torquay Gunner]

3 minutes ago, foxfanazer said:

Your players grab people excessively from set pieces all of the time and nothings ever given. Gabriel and Saliba are notorious for it

It happens in most PL games, but fouls on the keeper are generally upheld.

[JonnyZeroFox]

It took a long time to make the decision, very harsh on West Ham I felt, and that could well relegate them 

[Torquay Gunner]

10 minutes ago, Leicesterpool said:

Premier League decided where the title was going in that decision, you could play the footage 100 times and still wouldn't see a foul. However VAR claim there "was a foul on the keeper". 

Specsavers visit due perhaps. 

[whoareyaaa]

Palace will get a draw or win on the last day, it's written.

[Torquay Gunner]

1 minute ago, whoareyaaa said:

Palace will get a draw or win on the last day, it's written.

Hoping Bournemouth take points off Man City in their penultimate game.

[sharpylcfc]

With how long it took for the decision to be made it wasn't clear and obvious so goal should of stood.

[Parafox]

18 minutes ago, Leicesterpool said:

Premier League decided where the title was going in that decision, you could play the footage 100 times and still wouldn't see a foul. However VAR claim there "was a foul on the keeper". 

Yes, because there was.

 

Jeez. What are you on?

[Leicesterpool]

1 minute ago, Parafox said:

Yes, because there was.

 

Jeez. What are you on?

Put your Arsenal scarf away.

[Super_horns]

There were a number of potential fouls but this was the important one and came first  I guess.

[whoareyaaa]

There player scores a header if Troassard wasn't holding him and Raya barging into him

Edited 10 May by whoareyaaa

[st albans fox]

Tbh, the persistent shirt pull on raya is more relevant than the arm across him. 
 

[katieakita]

Anyone able to post a video of the incident as you will see a number of fouls taking place the fact it took so long to come to a decision and no mention of looking at any number of other fouls will cause anger, this might win Arsenal the league but will also relegate West ham

[Parafox]

23 minutes ago, Leicesterpool said:

Put your Arsenal scarf away.

I hate them fwiw. I'm just stating facts. You can't deny a decision just because you don't want it to be right.

[LcFc_Smiv]

36 minutes ago, Leicesterpool said:

Always seems strange that the bigger clubs always get the decisions when it comes to VAR. Goes in at the other its goal. Video Technology in other sports works great. Maybe it shows doesn't work in football or it's being used for the wrong reason. I'm sure in other sports like in cricket, if there is not enough evidence or conclusive, they stick with the original decision.  

We got the exact same decision the other year when Ben White was penalised for near enough the same thing???

[moore_94]

The officials just make it up as they go along with absolutely zero consistency

[Parafox]

I don't understand the conspiracy theorists that claim bias or cheating by the refs or the FA and PL.

 

Give me proof. Otherwise it's meaningless rubbish that the armchair warriors will claim to be fact.

 

 

Edited 10 May by Parafox

[Fear Of The Fox]

1 minute ago, Parafox said:

I don't understand the conspiracy theorists that claim bias or cheating by the refs or the FA and PL.

 

Give me proof. Otherwise it's meaningless rubbish that the armchair warriors will claim to be fact.

What kind of proof do you need? I can install cameras, mics and intercept phone calls etc if the government allows me to prove everything. Oh guess what! It's illegal for me to do that. 

 

[Leicester_Loyal]

4 minutes ago, Parafox said:

I don't understand the conspiracy theorists that claim bias or cheating by the refs or the FA and PL.

 

Give me proof. Otherwise it's meaningless rubbish that the armchair warriors will claim to be fact.

 

 

https://onefootball.com/en/news/clattenburg-i-let-spurs-self-destruct-in-battle-of-the-bridge-17849669

[whoareyaaa]

14 minutes ago, Parafox said:

I don't understand the conspiracy theorists that claim bias or cheating by the refs or the FA and PL.

 

Give me proof. Otherwise it's meaningless rubbish that the armchair warriors will claim to be fact.

 

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calciopoli

 

and the ref that got caught scoring cocaine and calling Klopp and you think it’s all squeaky clean 

Edited 10 May by whoareyaaa

[Fear Of The Fox]

1 minute ago, whoareyaaa said:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calciopoli

This isn't proof for him. He wants pure recorded evidence for VAR corruption etc. 

[Parafox]

8 minutes ago, Fear Of The Fox said:

What kind of proof do you need? I can install cameras, mics and intercept phone calls etc if the government allows me to prove everything. Oh guess what! It's illegal for me to do that. 

 

But what you're claiming, rhetorically and without proof is meaningless. It's just your opinion.