Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, Noahfence said:

And we wait for the fallout of how these men came to be here.. 

I'm thinking the "why" rather than "how" may give more useful insight so as to prevent such things from happening, but that's just my take. 

  • Like 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, leicsmac said:

Additionally, if this is what it initially appears to be, it plays into the bigger question of ME geopolitics and exactly why the UK still seems unnecessarily determined to pick a side on the matter. 

So we need to make a decision as to whether we want US bases in the UK 

afaik, we had given permission of use on the basis that sorties from uk bases were defensive 

 

I’m also uncomfortable if we don’t take a stand against a country that have murdered tens of thousands of their own citizens for protesting against their govt. 

and we’ve sanctioned the IRGC for amongst other things, recruitment of uk nationals to carry out attacks against uk citizens. 
so maybe Iran have got involved in our domestic politics ? 

  • Like 1
Posted
36 minutes ago, leicsmac said:

Or a possibility is that the relevant security services did know but let things play out as they did in order to deceive and/or protect a source giving the information. 

We’ll see 

If we ever find out 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, st albans fox said:

So we need to make a decision as to whether we want US bases in the UK 

afaik, we had given permission of use on the basis that sorties from uk bases were defensive 

 

I’m also uncomfortable if we don’t take a stand against a country that have murdered tens of thousands of their own citizens for protesting against their govt. 

and we’ve sanctioned the IRGC for amongst other things, recruitment of uk nationals to carry out attacks against uk citizens. 
so maybe Iran have got involved in our domestic politics ? 

And that is merely the latest move in a series of events that have been rolling since the 1950s and before and in which several players, including the UK, have played their part. Perhaps it's time to change the rules a bit?

 

I agree that it's rather discomforting to not take a stand against a nation that brutalises it's own citizens, but, as has been said before, if the UK is going to operate on that standard then they're going to have a pretty long list to check off or simply appear as maliciously hypocritical as the Americans are. 

 

And yes, so long as the current American government and its attitude towards any nation that doesn't follow it's manner of Social Darwinist sociopathy continues, the question of any kind of alliance including hosting bases, should be raised. 

Edited by leicsmac
  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, leicsmac said:

And yes, so long as the current American government and its attitude towards any nation that doesn't follow it's manner of Social Darwinist sociopathy continues, the question of any kind of alliance including hosting bases, should be raised. 

Then we have to take immediate economic responsibility for our defence which it seems we aren’t prepared to 

we can’t have it both ways ???.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, st albans fox said:

Then we have to take immediate economic responsibility for our defence which it seems we aren’t prepared to 

we can’t have it both ways ???.

And economic responsibility on quite a few other matters, as well. 

 

But then in this case it appears to be a matter of no good choices, only bad ones - either continue being the poodle, with all the consequences that entails, or seek further independence and different alliances in that and other regards, with all the consequences that entails. 

Posted
1 minute ago, st albans fox said:

Trump is saying that they knew about them and the ‘attack’.  

he’s not well known for his reliability!

Yeah, not going to take that at face value.

 

I guess we'll find out in due course. 

Posted
14 minutes ago, st albans fox said:

Trump is saying that they knew about them and the ‘attack’.  

he’s not well known for his reliability!

He stopped the attack single handedly

  • Haha 4
Posted

You've got to be an absolutely massive Karen to want to deliberately march down a street where you know EVERYONE thinks you're a twat wearing a silly little uniform just for the attention. 

  • Like 4
Posted
1 hour ago, Finnegan said:

You've got to be an absolutely massive Karen to want to deliberately march down a street where you know EVERYONE thinks you're a twat wearing a silly little uniform just for the attention. 

It’s the unshakeable conviction that they should which gets me.

Posted
2 hours ago, st albans fox said:

Trump is saying that they knew about them and the ‘attack’.  

he’s not well known for his reliability!

Police said they received a phone call about 3 vans acting suspiciously. 

Turns out it wasn't Trump, the FBI nor the CIA who called it in but Mr. & Mrs. Albert Scroggins of nearby Sheepwash Lane. They simply looked out their window and thought, Hello, what those fellas up to? No good, I would wager'.

Posted
58 minutes ago, Jon the Hat said:

It’s the unshakeable conviction that they should which gets me.

They just want to make life unpleasant for others because they know their way of life is on borrowed time

Posted
40 minutes ago, Free Falling Foxes said:

Police said they received a phone call about 3 vans acting suspiciously. 

Turns out it wasn't Trump, the FBI nor the CIA who called it in but Mr. & Mrs. Albert Scroggins of nearby Sheepwash Lane. They simply looked out their window and thought, Hello, what those fellas up to? No good, I would wager'.

I wouldn’t bet on it.  Common to deny intelligence at early stages of an investigation, only Trump is an idiot.

Posted
9 minutes ago, Jon the Hat said:

I wouldn’t bet on it.  Common to deny intelligence at early stages of an investigation, only Trump is an idiot.

There was a tweet issued 20 hours ago by one of these global news sites (just rehashing other stuff I think) which actually stated that US intelligence had identified RAF Fairford as being subject to a threat 


now that’s not really news because Iran literally did that in July 

but it’s crazy that this was tweeted at 23:18 at the very time that these three vans were en route 

Posted
3 hours ago, Free Falling Foxes said:

Police said they received a phone call about 3 vans acting suspiciously. 

Turns out it wasn't Trump, the FBI nor the CIA who called it in but Mr. & Mrs. Albert Scroggins of nearby Sheepwash Lane. They simply looked out their window and thought, Hello, what those fellas up to? No good, I would wager'.

Yes there were some suspicious vans around the base late at night apparently and the locals raised the alarm .

In some places you probably wouldn’t think much of it

Posted
5 hours ago, Finnegan said:

You've got to be an absolutely massive Karen to want to deliberately march down a street where you know EVERYONE thinks you're a twat wearing a silly little uniform just for the attention. 

They don't do it for the attention they do it to intimidate and provoke 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...