Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Why on earth did Reece not say anything about seeing Rachel and Steven at the family tree and Rachel telling him to leave? Surely that would implicate them as traitors and also would explain why Steven was pushing the Maz agenda. Totally baffling that it wasn’t mentioned!

Edited by Samu
  • Like 2
Posted
2 hours ago, Grebfromgrebland said:

Well it turns out to be the most Brexity reform person out of all of them. 

 

Remember the BBC has a mandate to appeal specifically more to reform voters through it's programming and content including dramas and gameshows. It sounds like a conspiracy theory but they actually announced it.

Do they? I’m claiming it as my theory but it was my “dual heritage” (presume that’s the right term, never too sure) wife that pitched it to me. 

Posted
3 hours ago, Grebfromgrebland said:

Well it turns out to be the most Brexity reform person out of all of them. 

 

Remember the BBC has a mandate to appeal specifically more to reform voters through it's programming and content including dramas and gameshows. It sounds like a conspiracy theory but they actually announced it.

You’re absolutely nuts, love it though, must be a wild ride to be in your brain

image.thumb.png.a76a295ba2e444aec7a8968aa049e81b.png

 

 

1 hour ago, Samu said:

Why on earth did Reece not say anything about seeing Rachel and Steven at the family tree and Rachel telling him to leave? Surely that would implicate them as traitors and also would explain why Steven was pushing the Maz agenda. Totally baffling that it wasn’t mentioned!

I think he had so much heat on him maybe he just wanted to stay quiet. 
 

Amazing Stephen got away with multiple big **** up. No way he is lasting long. 

Posted
7 hours ago, Samu said:

Why on earth did Reece not say anything about seeing Rachel and Steven at the family tree and Rachel telling him to leave? Surely that would implicate them as traitors and also would explain why Steven was pushing the Maz agenda. Totally baffling that it wasn’t mentioned!

Editing.

 

No way they haven’t been rumbled as a result of that.

Posted
55 minutes ago, VLC86 said:

Editing.

 

No way they haven’t been rumbled as a result of that.

Why would they edit it out? If it happened then everyone will probably go with Stephen at the next roundtable - think his co-traitors will turn on him pretty quick, he’s a bit useless…

  • Like 1
Posted
33 minutes ago, Tommy G said:

Why would they edit it out? If it happened then everyone will probably go with Stephen at the next roundtable - think his co-traitors will turn on him pretty quick, he’s a bit useless…

Because if all 3 original traitors got rumbled obviously early doors it wouldn’t make the best TV would it.

 

Whats likely happened is that the people that saw them talking around the picture have probably just told one person and kept quiet because they think they will get murdered otherwise so in reality they probably haven’t edited much out.

 

The fact that 2 or 3 people are calling Stephen out already tells you that some bits aren’t being shown.

Posted
1 minute ago, VLC86 said:

Because if all 3 original traitors got rumbled obviously early doors it wouldn’t make the best TV would it.

 

Whats likely happened is that the people that saw them talking around the picture have probably just told one person and kept quiet because they think they will get murdered otherwise so in reality they probably haven’t edited much out.

 

The fact that 2 or 3 people are calling Stephen out already tells you that some bits aren’t being shown.

When they realise he hasn’t been murdered they will probably twig he could be a traitor anyway. He also has the most awkward guilty face on him!

Posted
Just now, Tommy G said:

When they realise he hasn’t been murdered they will probably twig he could be a traitor anyway. He also has the most awkward guilty face on him!

Oh he’s ****ed, he’s implemented all over the shop, messed up at the round table and turned bright red after. 0 chance a lot of people haven’t clocked him.

  • Like 1
Posted

Daft old bat, even if you’re trying to have her voted off that’s incredibly likely to backfire. Gone from being under no suspicion to one of the most likely 

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, Unabomber said:

Linda is ****ing tapped 

Linda was on the last series wasn’t she? You mean Fiona? 
 

She’s walking into the turret tomorrow and Zidaning the other one.

Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, VLC86 said:

Linda was on the last series wasn’t she? You mean Fiona? 
 

She’s walking into the turret tomorrow and Zidaning the other one.

Lmao I have Linda on the brain but yes I mean Fiona 

Edited by Unabomber
  • Haha 1
Posted

Well that was wild tv. From Amanda giving it the big one about her detective skills… to a traitor. To Fiona just randomly throwing them both under the bus. Enjoyed it mind!

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...