Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
54 minutes ago, Sunbury Fox said:

With every passing minute,  it's looking like our decision to bowl after winning the toss was a very bad one. 

Does seem odd, considering strength of the side is the batting and the bowling looks underpowered already. Looks sunny at Headingley from the clips and wisdom suggests you bowl with grey skies overhead in Leeds

Posted
1 hour ago, CrawlingFox said:

Finan bowling slower than last season?

I am not sure that gun is that reliable. Goes from 79 to 63 and looks pretty similar 

Posted
16 minutes ago, MaidstoneFox said:

Does seem odd, considering strength of the side is the batting and the bowling looks underpowered already. Looks sunny at Headingley from the clips and wisdom suggests you bowl with grey skies overhead in Leeds

Weather looks like it get might get a bit cloudy and dark later on which is the only thing I can think of, might have a small downpour around 3-ish too.

Posted (edited)

Finan Bowls about 80 I'd say on a good day. Don't have any quicks really. Mike was a bit quicker. 

 

 

 

Hull is young but stops a bit in his action but the experts will sort that. 

 

 

 

Salisbury looks very ordinary. Like Davies but slower. 

 

Already grumpy. Sorry

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Cakey
Posted
11 minutes ago, Cakey said:

Finan Bowls about 80 I'd say on a good day. Don't have any quicks really. Mike was a bit quicker. 

 

Hull is young but stops a bit in his action but the experts will sort that. 

 

Salisbury looks very ordinary. Like Davies but slower. 

 

Already grumpy. Sorry

Agree with you that the gun is dodgy, one Chris Wright delivery was up at 88mph earlier.

 

I thought Finan looked decently quick last year, high 80s and a lot quicker than the rest. Feel like I may have imagined it now though watching him today.

 

Hull does look to have some potential with that frame.

Posted
2 hours ago, Sunbury Fox said:

With every passing minute,  it's looking like our decision to bowl after winning the toss was a very bad one. 

A few teams have been put in and the batsman scoring stupidly quickly. Durham were 45-0 after 10 overs and Derbys reached an unbeaten  50 in seven overs! Both were put in.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Mike the Metal Ed said:

Notts 182/9, good to see at least.

Apart from Mo Abbas capturing 6-49, just as a reminder of what might have been if he had stayed. :nono:

Posted
5 hours ago, CrawlingFox said:

Agree with you that the gun is dodgy, one Chris Wright delivery was up at 88mph earlier.

 

I thought Finan looked decently quick last year, high 80s and a lot quicker than the rest. Feel like I may have imagined it now though watching him today.

 

Yeh I felt that was the point to Finan, he seemed to hurry batsmen and got wickets. Maybe he is cutting his pace down to improve his accuracy as he was also a bit wild last season

  • Like 1
Posted

Tomorrow will be better. 

 

Ahmed turned into me first over. Forgot to pull the pin on that hand grenade!

Sobering to see a guy of his ability only pitching one in the over!

Posted
12 hours ago, Cakey said:

Tomorrow will be better

 

Ahmed turned into me first over. Forgot to pull the pin on that hand grenade!

Sobering to see a guy of his ability only pitching one in the over!

About that.

Posted

Salisbury calf injury.

Mulder not bowling due to back strain.

Yorkshire scoring at huge rate.

The 2 wickets today basically just 'given away'

LCCC forced to bowl the 2 spinners as closing in on 6 (SIX) overs behind the over-rate

Those 2 spinners getting smashed all over the place

Nightwatchman for Yorkshire looking extremely comfortable and about 20 runs off this best ever score.

 

Everything changes but nothing changes.

 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...