AoWW Posted 1 July 2007 Posted 1 July 2007 Press ReleaseIt is always the job of the Top Secret Inner Circle to ensure, during times of crisis, that members of FoxesTalk are sufficiently informed and protected. To this end, an entire new security level has been created for this thread and we would like to advise anyone continuing to read it beyond this point that they only have themselves to blame. Ends. Ouch! Surely he's not the only one that qualifies for that status?
Daggers Posted 1 July 2007 Posted 1 July 2007 Ouch! Surely he's not the only one that qualifies for that status? Sorry - I can not answer that the sign indicates posts of Matt-like quality as I am abiding by the warning and not reading this thread anymore.
Zingari Posted 1 July 2007 Posted 1 July 2007 Or maybe you're just too fooking retarded to see what I was talking about? Having re-read it, I think it's pretty clear. as you were the author i should think it would be Saying you dislike terrorists is much akin to saying grass is green and the sky is blue, they're statements of the obvious. Nobody likes 'terrorists', not even 'terrorists' because they don't exactly perceive THEMSELVES as, yeah, you got it, 'terrorists.' no it isn't , one is a statement of fact the other is an opinion Why should the normal, every day Muslim religious leader feel the need to have their community apologise? of course they should , as leaders of a religious group acting in their name they are duty bound and should condemn all acts committed in their name; after all they seem keen enough to demand apologies if their faith is percieved to be insulted; why do you not question why the leaders need these apologies why do you see it as so difficult for them to empathise with the feelings of the rest of society Has the protestant church ever apologised for the KKK? Extremists are ****s, no matter what they believe in. Anyone who inflicts their views on others is a tosser, no matter their race, creed or whatever - so all this "boot the terrorists out!" shit is just nonsensical. Of course no one wants them here, but we don't want pedophiles, rapists, murderers, thieves or Peter Stringfellow either - but we've got them, like every nation of course every nation has its undesirable elements ; does that mean the populace is expected to tolerate them ? of course it does not and if there was some way to rid ourselves of paedophiles we would do our best to do it by infiltrating their organisations etc ; why do you think muslims should be treated differently if they are percieved as being linked to terror .( maybe you do not believe there is a link , thats fine, go ahead an believe it but let me live in the real world ) would you say that no-one on this board should express an opnion as to what we should do with paedophiles ; i didn't see any comments by you or anyone else saying we should just learn to tolerate them You might not think you're being "racist", you might think it's over-dosing on politically correctness, but when you make statements like "terrorists out!!111omg!!" without really thinking about it, you're only going to make people feel uncomfortable by the prejudice that lies underneath. I mean - you shouldn't NEED to say 'terrorists, fook off.' it should be obvious. it may be your opinion that anyone criticising islam or being offended by their actions(or inaction by the leaders) is racist; but that is all it is ; just your opinion ( just consider for a moment that you maybe wrong and that you are tilting at windmills), but i don't hear or read much about other asian or mid eastern religions being questioned ; so i can only assume the "racism" that you seem to think it at the root of it all is that of a very very narrowly defined type. but yes you were correct in one thing , i am a fooking retard , the reason i know this is because i've bothered to answer an insult from a moderator who one would have thought should know better
Finnegan Posted 1 July 2007 Posted 1 July 2007 Uhmm, where do I start? Teaching you to use the quote tool might be helpful, but I'm sure Lookydo's around somewhere for that. no it isn't , one is a statement of fact the other is an opinion I think, pedantry aside, it's pretty safe to say that no one is going to claim a love for terrorists. of course they should , as leaders of a religious group acting in their name they are duty bound and should condemn all acts committed in their name; after all they seem keen enough to demand apologies if their faith is percieved to be insulted;why do you not question why the leaders need these apologies Taking, for example, the recent Danish newspaper scandal - it was the extremists that stormed Danish embassies, took hostile means to demand apologies and generally caused bother - NOT the average, British, muslim Imam (is that the correct term for a Muslim "priest"?) venting and ranting and cursing Denmark. of course they should , as leaders of a religious group acting in their name Hence my question about the Klan and Christianity. Why should an entire faith, a fairly noble, popular and widely practiced faith at that, be held accountable for the actions of a remote, psychotic and hugely fundamentalist minority? You speak as though every Muslim is an angry, hateful zealot - which is just ludicrously ignorant. why do you see it as so difficult for them to empathise with the feelings of the rest of society And where oh where did that come from? why do you think muslims should be treated differently if they are percieved as being linked to terror Jesus Christ it's like talking to a wall. The fact you just almost compared Muslims to pedophiles is slightly warping. Any individual suspected of terrorist activity should be tried without prejudice, as should any other criminal. Being suspicious of every Muslim and finger-pointing now is no better than twenty years ago being paranoid of everyone with a Belfast accent walking the streets of London. Do you not see how you're just digging your own hole, here? No one is saying you should learn to tolerate terrorists, or any other criminal. The point was, that saying we should get rid of terrorists is a retarded thing to say - they're criminals, so of course they should be disposed of. The way you talk suggests you fail to distinguish at all the difference between "a terrorists", "a criminal" and "a Muslim." Of course you should tolerate everyone of every race and religion - we're all just flesh and blood, you muppet. it may be your opinion that anyone criticising islam or being offended by their actions(or inaction by the leaders) is racist; but that is all it is ; just your opinion ( just consider for a moment that you maybe wrong and that you are tilting at windmills),but i don't hear or read much about other asian or mid eastern religions being questioned ; so i can only assume the "racism" that you seem to think it at the root of it all is that of a very very narrowly defined type. But what grounds do you actually HAVE to criticism Islam, the religion, beyond silly sensationalism and a phobia of fundamentalism? If you're too bigoted, narrow minded and down right stupid to distinguish the difference between a Muslim and a Terrorist I fooking pity you. Moreover, I'd rather see you booted out of this country than anyone of any faith. I'm not a fan of religion full stop, but I accept and appreciate people's right to have faith in what they will. Faith's a beautiful thing, I wouldn't want to live in a world without it. A minority take that faith and make it something corrupt, something sinister - and fear of that has polluted Western thinking a lot over the last five or six years. That's a tragedy, it really is, but getting on board with Daily Mailesque stupidity is inexcusable. I'd be embarassed to be you.
THEBIGJOHNSTEADER; Posted 1 July 2007 Posted 1 July 2007 This is great fookin news, brilliant to get me nervous before i fly on Tuesday. Me too!!
Webbo Posted 1 July 2007 Posted 1 July 2007 I'd be embarassed to be you. For someone who believes in tolerance, you seem to be very intolerant of people with differing opinions.
Daggers Posted 1 July 2007 Posted 1 July 2007 Don't mention the war (on terrorism) I did once... but I think I got away with it...
Daggers Posted 1 July 2007 Posted 1 July 2007 Why is anyone getting upset about this? Three of the crappiest ever acts of terrorism in the history of pathetic acts of terrorism. All in all, they managed to clock up a trip to the burns unit and some charges for having their vehicles towed away and impounded...not to mention the large petrol station bills. Pitiful, laughable, woeful.
Finnegan Posted 1 July 2007 Posted 1 July 2007 Three of the crappiest ever acts of terrorism in the history of pathetic acts of terrorism Dunno. Read 'To Dream of Freedom.' Some efforts by the FWA and MAC failed so miserably no one except them ever knew about them. Which sort of defeats the point in the first place, really.
Webbo Posted 1 July 2007 Posted 1 July 2007 I'm intolerant of intolerance. Ironic, eh? The ironic thing is that you are both (in my opinion) partly right. Obviously you cannot blame all or even most muslims for terrorism but, muslim leaders (mostly) do constantly demand apologies for the smallest of slights, with the implicit threat of vengeance in the background. Certainly no one in government cares as much when the Pope or the Archbishop of Canterbury are offended.
Brainy Posted 1 July 2007 Author Posted 1 July 2007 Heathrow Airport has been closed as a suspect package has been found.
Daggers Posted 1 July 2007 Posted 1 July 2007 Dear Terrorists, My mate would like to say "thank you very much for stopping drunk Glaswegians from ruining his fortnight in Spain, cheers "
Matt Posted 1 July 2007 Posted 1 July 2007 Don't quite believe what I just heard on the news, An off-duty police officier sprayed one of the terrorist's down after he was out the car, and he is now being treated for burn's in a local hospital. Let the fooker suffer! They should have thrown him back in the fire!
filbertway Posted 1 July 2007 Posted 1 July 2007 Don't quite believe what I just heard on the news, An off-duty police officier sprayed one of the terrorist's down after he was out the car, and he is now being treated for burn's in a local hospital. Let the fooker suffer! They should have thrown him back in the fire! Would be better to try and scare them at the station and get info out of them I reckon.
l444ry Posted 1 July 2007 Posted 1 July 2007 Don't quite believe what I just heard on the news, An off-duty police officier sprayed one of the terrorist's down after he was out the car, and he is now being treated for burn's in a local hospital. Let the fooker suffer! They should have thrown him back in the fire! And now it's going to cost us all in N.H.S. and H.M. Prison costs. Beggars belief doesn't it?
Floating Fox Posted 1 July 2007 Posted 1 July 2007 Don't quite believe what I just heard on the news, An off-duty police officier sprayed one of the terrorist's down after he was out the car, and he is now being treated for burn's in a local hospital. Let the fooker suffer! They should have thrown him back in the fire! The Suspect is better alive than dead you complete testicle.
Hullfox Posted 1 July 2007 Posted 1 July 2007 The Suspect is better alive than dead you complete testicle. Not indefinitely.
Fez of Mahrez Posted 1 July 2007 Posted 1 July 2007 Islamic fundamentalism seems to have become a euphemism for mentally ill foreign people with beards.
Hullfox Posted 1 July 2007 Posted 1 July 2007 Islamic fundamentalism seems to have become a euphemism for mentally ill foreign people with beards. Leave me mum out of this yer fooker.
Koke Posted 1 July 2007 Posted 1 July 2007 Its not because of "British way of life" they doing these acts. No muslim gives a shit what D!ck, John and Harry do in their private life Its all political. Foreign policy. Iraq war etc. Still a fecked up and stupid thing to do. These people are brainwashed.
Dr The Singh Posted 2 July 2007 Posted 2 July 2007 Its not because of "British way of life" they doing these acts. No muslim gives a shit what D!ck, John and Harry do in their private lifeIts all political. Foreign policy. Iraq war etc. Still a fecked up and stupid thing to do. These people are brainwashed. True to a certain extent but that doesn't condone there actions. Islamic radicals and fundamentalism was here in Britian long before 9/11, Iraq War etc, groups such as HUT were recruiting within Universities and Mosques in the 90's. What the War on Iraq and 9/11 has done, it has just acted as a catalyst and given fuel for those that believe that a book is the only political entity and that no other faith should exist!!!
Ultra Posted 2 July 2007 Posted 2 July 2007 As if Islam is the only faith which breeds psychotic fundamentalism... Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism, Buddhism and Sikhism all have perfectly unblemished records - NOT!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.