Mark Posted 22 September 2007 Posted 22 September 2007 Starting 11 - 4 changes but still no Ferreira or Kaebi. Fulop Stearman McAuley Kisnorbo Mattock Hume Clemence Chambers Sheehan Fryatt Cort Live Chat available
Ricey Posted 22 September 2007 Posted 22 September 2007 Starting 11 - 4 changes but still no Ferreira or Kaebi.Fulop Stearman McAuley Kisnorbo Mattock Hume Clemence Chambers Sheehan Fryatt Cort Chambers in the middle? Don't understand that. I demand an explanation regarding Kaebi and Ferreira, it's just getting silly now.
Sparky Posted 22 September 2007 Posted 22 September 2007 would have thought stearman will be centre mid with chambers right back ?
Stevosevic Posted 22 September 2007 Posted 22 September 2007 Interesting. No N'Gotty, i think DJ's pace would have been vital for us today. Was very surprised when Chambers was bought on in CM on Tuesday night, he played OK, but dont want to see him playing there.
sdb Posted 22 September 2007 Posted 22 September 2007 that team wont win so negative i know but surely a bit of pace would've helped - kaebi/DJ?
Master Fox Posted 22 September 2007 Posted 22 September 2007 No Adda Djeziri?? Fryatt and Cort? Should be interesting.
Thracian Posted 22 September 2007 Posted 22 September 2007 Cannot say Chambers in midfield impresses me. I don't like to see people out of position. Otherwise the side it is not especially negative and is generally balanced with five potential scorers (by my system of analysis) which is acceptable in an away game against genuinely difficult opposition. Cort's unfairly disallowed goal might have convinced Megson that he's more dangerous than DeVries. He's retained a big man up front and the fact he's preferred Cort is purely an opinion thing and notsomething I'd criticise him for whichever way the result goes. There is enough potential for movement and for us having two strikers working off the big man. Stearman and Sheehan should be able to provide support so altogether I'd give the manager 8/10 for his team selection and only really disagree with the man out of position. Disappointed there's no Kaebi or King on the bench. Subs are: Henderson, N'Gotty, Kishishev, Campbell, DeVries.
SOCCERROO FOX Posted 22 September 2007 Posted 22 September 2007 Only one i'm not sure about is cort but hopefully 3rd up from a spell should go alright (i just refered to cort in horse racing terminalogy )
Milky Posted 22 September 2007 Posted 22 September 2007 That team looks really, really shit. Oh well, let's hope! hopefully they can form the right partnerships on the pitch and it'll work.
SOCCERROO FOX Posted 22 September 2007 Posted 22 September 2007 I'm there! I'm up for some antics aswell
Mark Posted 22 September 2007 Author Posted 22 September 2007 Who's on the bench? Subs: Henderson, N'Gotty, Kishishev, Campbell, De Vries
Stevosevic Posted 22 September 2007 Posted 22 September 2007 Subs: Henderson, N'Gotty, Kishishev, Campbell, De Vries It's getting ridiculous now regarding Kaebi and Ferriera.
FleckneyFox Posted 22 September 2007 Posted 22 September 2007 How do you know thats the team nothing on OS? if that is the team: GK DF MF ST
Lillehamring Posted 22 September 2007 Posted 22 September 2007 would have thought stearman will be centre mid with chambers right back ? either way it doesn't make any sense - neither stearman or chambers are CM, this is madness.... unless he goes 4-3-3 ... or with hume just behind the front two Fulop Stearman - McAuley - Kisnorbo - MattockChambers - Clemence - SheehanHumeFryatt - Cort
dave_the_fox Posted 22 September 2007 Posted 22 September 2007 How do you know thats the team nothing on OS?if that is the team: GK DF MF ST 104.9 Mate
Harpenden Fox Posted 22 September 2007 Posted 22 September 2007 so from 15 summer signings, 4 make today's starting eleven, and 3 others populate the bench. That's a lot of ' one for the future' signings. Neilson and Hellings have to be up there with Gregor Stevens in the all time bad signings list...
Flexx Posted 22 September 2007 Posted 22 September 2007 Maybe this? ---------------------------------Fulop Stearman----------McAuley-----------------Kisnorbo-----------Mattock Chambers------------------------------------Clemence----------Sheehan ------------------------^^ ----------------------Hume ----------------------Fryatt----------------------Cort
davieG Posted 22 September 2007 Posted 22 September 2007 either way it doesn't make any sense - neither stearman or chambers are CM, this is madness....unless he goes 4-3-3 ... or with hume just behind the front two Fulop Stearman - McAuley - Kisnorbo - MattockClemence - Chambers - SheehanHumeFryatt - Cort That might work if you swap Clemence & Chambers.
Lillehamring Posted 22 September 2007 Posted 22 September 2007 Maybe this?---------------------------------Fulop Stearman----------McAuley-----------------Kisnorbo-----------Mattock Chambers------------------------------------Clemence----------Sheehan ------------------------^^ ----------------------Hume ----------------------Fryatt----------------------Cort 10 minutes too late, but a great football mind at work... and mine was neater although, i didn't give hume cat ears.... EDIT: yeah, yeah, yeah - i put chambers in the wrong place
Webbo Posted 22 September 2007 Posted 22 September 2007 [quote name='Ricey' date='Sep 22 2007, 02:21 PM' post='757697 I demand an explanation regarding Kaebi and Ferreira, it's just getting silly now. Err.. the manager doesn't rate them?
Flexx Posted 22 September 2007 Posted 22 September 2007 10 minutes too late, but a great football mind at work...and mine was neater although, i didn't give hume cat ears.... You put Chambers in the middle, and Hume can drop to centre mid when we're defending and attacking mid when attacking.
Simon Posted 22 September 2007 Posted 22 September 2007 FFS I despair with this. Our team's crying out for width so lets play with no natural wingers, and no wingers on the bench. Smart Now we can't even change it up if it's not working. To me, that's not only naive but plain stupid. I hope I'm wrong.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.