Finnegan Posted 15 November 2007 Posted 15 November 2007 *cough*Dick *cough* Don't say that too loudly, you'll have Phube all over the place with a hard on.
Darkzzz_ Posted 15 November 2007 Posted 15 November 2007 Here we go lads, a volunteer. First to burn! ...chill out my dearest.... is it because you cant get into any decent jeans?? You know i love ya P.S- why worry about what other people are wearing... as long as you look good finnegan then thats all you gotta worry about, and im sure you look really great.. anyway... if you do want to start that fire... ive got a pub in my town where you can find most of your thigh hugging mates..!! It needs a good make over....
Dames Posted 16 November 2007 Posted 16 November 2007 I love my G-Star Jeans. Amen to that. I love my jeans baggy (not too baggy) and slightly low riding I don't know how guys can wear skinny jeans they must be lacking in the male reproduction area thats for sure. Faggots.
Tommy G Posted 16 November 2007 Posted 16 November 2007 I love my G-Star Jeans. Yep G star jeans are where its at. It didnt used to be ''chav'' about 18 months ago but unfortunately the chavs are starting to cotton on....as soon as i see someone with rolled up footy socks over their G star jeans that will be the point when I stop buying them! levi's aswell are a must I love my G-Star Jeans. Yep G star jeans are where its at. It didnt used to be ''chav'' about 18 months ago but unfortunately the chavs are starting to cotton on....as soon as i see someone with rolled up footy socks over their G star jeans that will be the point when I stop buying them! levi's aswell are a must
Finnegan Posted 16 November 2007 Posted 16 November 2007 ...chill out my dearest.... is it because you cant get into any decent jeans?? You know i love ya P.S- why worry about what other people are wearing... as long as you look good finnegan then thats all you gotta worry about, and im sure you look really great.. anyway... if you do want to start that fire... ive got a pub in my town where you can find most of your thigh hugging mates..!! It needs a good make over.... Cheeky bastard. I'll bet you £10 I've got a better (read: skinnier) figure than you, kiddo!
Darkzzz_ Posted 16 November 2007 Posted 16 November 2007 Cheeky bastard. I'll bet you £10 I've got a better (read: skinnier) figure than you, kiddo! Yes i am sure you have, im only playing... so you interested in burning that pub down... i cant do it on me own skinny man...
Master Fox Posted 16 November 2007 Posted 16 November 2007 I can’t wear tight trousers/jeans. They rub on my gonads too much and make them all sore and dry so they go all flakey
Bert Posted 16 November 2007 Posted 16 November 2007 *cough*Chav!!!! *cough* (Oh to start that discussion again!!! ) Ooohhh i've never been called that before. I'm sorry you don't like them or can't afford them or whatever. But i'll have you know i'm not a chav. Now fook off back to your shitty Wii.
hairy Posted 16 November 2007 Posted 16 November 2007 I can’t wear tight trousers/jeans. They rub on my gonads too much and make them all sore and dry so they go all flakey Sure thats not clap?
AoWW Posted 16 November 2007 Posted 16 November 2007 I can’t wear tight trousers/jeans. They rub on my gonads too much and make them all sore and dry so they go all flakey Far too graphic. :pinch:
Lillehamring Posted 16 November 2007 Posted 16 November 2007 50 years???? more like 150 - the thing i can't understand about jeans is why they seem to be classed as a 'seperate' thing to trousers, just because of the fabric, eg places with dress codes will often say 'no jeans', the only thing defining them as such is the weave of the cotton? perhaps it is because they were originally designed as work trousers... personally, i wear cords, mostly.
Trumpet Posted 16 November 2007 Posted 16 November 2007 50 years????more like 150 - the thing i can't understand about jeans is why they seem to be classed as a 'seperate' thing to trousers, just because of the fabric, eg places with dress codes will often say 'no jeans', the only thing defining them as such is the weave of the cotton? perhaps it is because they were originally designed as work trousers... personally, i wear cords, mostly.
Lillehamring Posted 16 November 2007 Posted 16 November 2007 ok, fair enough, but did it have to be gay laughter...
davieG Posted 16 November 2007 Author Posted 16 November 2007 50 years????more like 150 - the thing i can't understand about jeans is why they seem to be classed as a 'seperate' thing to trousers, just because of the fabric, eg places with dress codes will often say 'no jeans', the only thing defining them as such is the weave of the cotton? perhaps it is because they were originally designed as work trousers... personally, i wear cords, mostly. I did say at least 50 years and I was really thinking Britain and as a fashion item. As for their 'separateness' I guess that's relates to the material, in the same way you referred to cords. Perhaps there is this 'class' distinction coming into in it as you say denim jeans = work trouser, cords = upper classes slobbing out attire. I see no one has really come up with why they are still an accepted fashion item by the young even though their grandmas' are wearing them.
Lillehamring Posted 16 November 2007 Posted 16 November 2007 I did say at least 50 years and I was really thinking Britain and as a fashion item. As for their 'separateness' I guess that's relates to the material, in the same way you referred to cords. Perhaps there is this 'class' distinction coming into in it as you say denim jeans = work trouser, cords = upper classes slobbing out attire.I see no one has really come up with why they are still an accepted fashion item by the young even though their grandmas' are wearing them. well, i would but i'm obviously an upper class slob!
Finnegan Posted 16 November 2007 Posted 16 November 2007 Far too graphic. :pinch: How are you still not used to MF?
Trumpet Posted 16 November 2007 Posted 16 November 2007 ok, fair enough, but did it have to be gay laughter... I thought the "gay" laughter would be rather apt, regarding the cords. :giggle:
James. Posted 16 November 2007 Posted 16 November 2007 I'm with Finnegan on this one. People who wear skinny jeans look like c*nts. That is a fact. I actually only own one pair of jeans - slightly baggy Bench ones. I love them.
davieG Posted 16 November 2007 Author Posted 16 November 2007 well, i would but i'm obviously an upper class slob! A somewhat mis use of my words but hey if the cap fits
potter3 Posted 16 November 2007 Posted 16 November 2007 I'm with Finnegan on this one. People who wear skinny jeans look like c*nts. That is a fact.
Finnegan Posted 16 November 2007 Posted 16 November 2007 All aboard the pyre bandwagon. Next stop, Panic!
James. Posted 16 November 2007 Posted 16 November 2007 Not just skinny jeans. Pointed shoes as well. And that stupid silver girly belt thing. And big gay hair. The whole look is abysmal. They can all c**t off.
potter3 Posted 16 November 2007 Posted 16 November 2007 Not just skinny jeans. Pointed shoes as well. And that stupid silver girly belt thing. And big gay hair.The whole look is abysmal. They can all c**t off. And those skinny t-shirts and skinny cardigans aswell
James. Posted 16 November 2007 Posted 16 November 2007 And those skinny t-shirts and skinny cardigans aswell The irony is I think girls look brilliant when they dress like that (well at least the tight jeans, little top, etc)... if only those misguided males c*nts would take note.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.