Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Stevosevic

Charlton good enough for Sinclair

By Stevosevic, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

Rodders

Rodders

Posted
Posted
Nice to know, it was not a silly question then... :)

I thought we needed more a right winger than a left winger. We have Laczko, Mattock and Bori for the left.....

But Bori plays on the right, and Mattock plays at left back.... :blink:

Rodders

Rodders

Posted
Posted
Not sure if it's already been mentioned but isn't there a FIFA directive in place that says a player can not play for 3 teams in one season? If so then Scott has already played for QPR & Chelsea this season, hope i am wrong!

Section 3 of Article 5 says:

"Players may be registered with a maximum of three clubs during one season"

So it's ok - no problems.

Guest shearfox

Guest shearfox

Posted
Posted
But Bori plays on the right, and Mattock plays at left back.... :blink:

Bori is thought to be capable of playing on the left and so can Mattock but it would be nice to have a player with far more experience within that position

ArgyleRoss

ArgyleRoss

Posted
Posted

He can play left wing, right wing or up front.

thats one of his goals for us last season. His pace is frightening. I'm just glad he isn't going to play against us if you do sign him because he is a cracking player, assuming you dont sign him before the weekend!!
morris1234

morris1234

Posted
Posted

I WANT THIS GUY!!!!!!!!! i tell you what if we get him here i'll love it and then maybe have a better chance of getting him permo ;):rolleyes:

he reminds you of henry the way he makes defenders basically well.............shit themselves and start to run the other way!

stevie909

stevie909

Posted
Posted

surely he can't come here? (just read this on 606, sorry if its already been said)

fifa rules say a player can only belong to three clubs in one season (loans included) howvere they can only play in official matches for two.

seeing as he has played for chelsea and qpr this season, surely that renders him ineligible?

:dunno:

but if he is allowed to come, GREAT signing.

teblin

teblin

Posted
Posted
surely he can't come here? (just read this on 606, sorry if its already been said)

fifa rules say a player can only belong to three clubs in one season (loans included) howvere they can only play in official matches for two.

seeing as he has played for chelsea and qpr this season, surely that renders him ineligible?

:dunno:

but if he is allowed to come, GREAT signing.

Wouldn't have thought it was an issue as colins john played for fulham and has been on loan here and is now with watford.

sham

sham

Posted
Posted

ivory coast are losing 4-1 to egypt. looks like drogba is on his way back to chelsea and seeing as ghana lost therefore essien going back too does that scott sinclair will be available for us?

Hopefully....

Darkzzz_

Darkzzz_

Posted
Posted

We want this guy!!

We need this guy!!!

But.......

Do you think he will want to come here?? Ollie will obviously be a big factor in this!!

It will be a massive signing if he pulls it off.... I cant see him getting in that chelsea side so come on scott it makes sense!!!

Be somewhere where you can make a real name for yourself and where we will love you!!! :wub: (GAY) :D

This has Muzzy Izzet part two written all over it.... Although they are totally different players they both only made the fringes of first time football at stamford bridge!!

:scarf:

surrifox

surrifox

Posted
Posted
We want this guy!!

We need this guy!!!

But.......

Do you think he will want to come here?? Ollie will obviously be a big factor in this!!

It will be a massive signing if he pulls it off.... I cant see him getting in that chelsea side so come on scott it makes sense!!!

Be somewhere where you can make a real name for yourself and where we will love you!!! :wub: (GAY) :D

This has Muzzy Izzet part two written all over it.... Although they are totally different players they both only made the fringes of first time football at stamford bridge!!

:scarf:

Muzzy was pretty much unheard of and I don't think ever played for Chelsea in the league when we signed him - this guy is better known as he has been on loan at other clubs none of whom seem to have put much effort into trying to sign him

Ric Flair

Ric Flair

Posted
Posted
I disagree with that.

I don't think they rate him that highly. They know he's a decent talent (very good IMO) but at a team that hasn't actually got as big a squad as some big Premiership teams with youngsters breaking through, if they thought he was that good they'd have given him a few more games. They've been quite stretched since their African players went away and he's not been on the bench for them. He wasn't involved with any of their recent Carling Cup matches either.

Now, I appreciate that doesn't mean they'd look to sell him. But at 19, if you're going to break in to Chelsea's first team you need to already be getting the odd game for them and not 2 token cup games a season. You also perhaps need to go out on loan to another Premiership club if you can't force in to the team yet. Not, seen any Premiership clubs after him.

Chances are, he's a player that will develop in to a Premiership player in the next few years, but to be good enough to play regularly for Chelsea? I bet the boys in blue have their doubts and a sizeable offer for him may well tempt them even if they don't need the money. A few years down the line if he's not broken through and is not over-hyped, then they'd get nowhere near that sort of cash. Arsenal and Man Utd often cash in on their 'decent' youngsters, some players that have gone on to be very good Premiership players (Bentley £500,000, James Harper & Steve Sidwell) but at the time their clubs didn't think or couldn't be arsed to put the work in to get them to that level.

Jonezy

Jonezy

Posted
Posted
I don't think they rate him that highly. They know he's a decent talent (very good IMO) but at a team that hasn't actually got as big a squad as some big Premiership teams with youngsters breaking through, if they thought he was that good they'd have given him a few more games. They've been quite stretched since their African players went away and he's not been on the bench for them. He wasn't involved with any of their recent Carling Cup matches either.

Now, I appreciate that doesn't mean they'd look to sell him. But at 19, if you're going to break in to Chelsea's first team you need to already be getting the odd game for them and not 2 token cup games a season. You also perhaps need to go out on loan to another Premiership club if you can't force in to the team yet. Not, seen any Premiership clubs after him.

Chances are, he's a player that will develop in to a Premiership player in the next few years, but to be good enough to play regularly for Chelsea? I bet the boys in blue have their doubts and a sizeable offer for him may well tempt them even if they don't need the money. A few years down the line if he's not broken through and is not over-hyped, then they'd get nowhere near that sort of cash. Arsenal and Man Utd often cash in on their 'decent' youngsters, some players that have gone on to be very good Premiership players (Bentley £500,000, James Harper & Steve Sidwell) but at the time their clubs didn't think or couldn't be arsed to put the work in to get them to that level.

That actually made sense... :thumbup:

Fez of Mahrez

Fez of Mahrez

Posted
Posted
I don't think they rate him that highly. They know he's a decent talent (very good IMO) but at a team that hasn't actually got as big a squad as some big Premiership teams with youngsters breaking through, if they thought he was that good they'd have given him a few more games. They've been quite stretched since their African players went away and he's not been on the bench for them. He wasn't involved with any of their recent Carling Cup matches either.

Now, I appreciate that doesn't mean they'd look to sell him. But at 19, if you're going to break in to Chelsea's first team you need to already be getting the odd game for them and not 2 token cup games a season. You also perhaps need to go out on loan to another Premiership club if you can't force in to the team yet. Not, seen any Premiership clubs after him.

Chances are, he's a player that will develop in to a Premiership player in the next few years, but to be good enough to play regularly for Chelsea? I bet the boys in blue have their doubts and a sizeable offer for him may well tempt them even if they don't need the money. A few years down the line if he's not broken through and is not over-hyped, then they'd get nowhere near that sort of cash. Arsenal and Man Utd often cash in on their 'decent' youngsters, some players that have gone on to be very good Premiership players (Bentley £500,000, James Harper & Steve Sidwell) but at the time their clubs didn't think or couldn't be arsed to put the work in to get them to that level.

Fair enough. I still disagree and can't be arsed to write reams about why. F**king work. I hate it.

Manwell Pablo

Manwell Pablo

Posted
Posted
I don't think they rate him that highly. They know he's a decent talent (very good IMO) but at a team that hasn't actually got as big a squad as some big Premiership teams with youngsters breaking through, if they thought he was that good they'd have given him a few more games. They've been quite stretched since their African players went away and he's not been on the bench for them. He wasn't involved with any of their recent Carling Cup matches either.

Now, I appreciate that doesn't mean they'd look to sell him. But at 19, if you're going to break in to Chelsea's first team you need to already be getting the odd game for them and not 2 token cup games a season. You also perhaps need to go out on loan to another Premiership club if you can't force in to the team yet. Not, seen any Premiership clubs after him.

Chances are, he's a player that will develop in to a Premiership player in the next few years, but to be good enough to play regularly for Chelsea? I bet the boys in blue have their doubts and a sizeable offer for him may well tempt them even if they don't need the money. A few years down the line if he's not broken through and is not over-hyped, then they'd get nowhere near that sort of cash. Arsenal and Man Utd often cash in on their 'decent' youngsters, some players that have gone on to be very good Premiership players (Bentley £500,000, James Harper & Steve Sidwell) but at the time their clubs didn't think or couldn't be arsed to put the work in to get them to that level.

Maybe so but they wouldn't sell him for 3mil, not for a couple of years yet anyway.

Ric Flair

Ric Flair

Posted
Posted
Maybe so but they wouldn't sell him for 3mil, not for a couple of years yet anyway.

I like how we were quoted as having to come up with several million to have a chance of signing Ryan Smith from Arsenal because Wenger rated him so highly and then 6 months later he went to Derby for £300,000. :laugh:

Sinclair appears to have more end product so I doubt that will happen with him, but I don't think it's beyond the realms of possibility that he may be available for a permanent transfer within the next season or so.

Manwell Pablo

Manwell Pablo

Posted
Posted
I like how we were quoted as having to come up with several million to have a chance of signing Ryan Smith from Arsenal because Wenger rated him so highly and then 6 months later he went to Derby for £300,000. :laugh:

Sinclair appears to have more end product so I doubt that will happen with him, but I don't think it's beyond the realms of possibility that he may be available for a permanent transfer within the next season or so.

...I thought they payed a million :unsure:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...