Charlton good enough for Sinclair

[reynard]

Off according to Ollie on radio Leicester as we are too crap for him to come to us!

[fosseman]

Off according to Ollie on radio Leicester as we are too crap for him to come to us!

Another target hits the dust. Only Robson can save us now!!!!

[MPH]

Another target hits the dust. Only Robson can save us now!!!!

please tell me that was a joke......

[MikeyT]

Another target hits the dust. Only Robson can save us now!!!!

Are you having a joke!

[Jon the Hat]

Dead in the water. What do they mean not good enough??

[Super Arj]

Dead in the water. What do they mean not good enough??

pricks

they need a slap and i hope chelsea get relegated soon

[dandannieldanok]

Dead in the water. What do they mean not good enough??

That's quite funny actually Hopefully it will be a kick up the backside for Holloway and the players.

[Joe.]

Bloody hell.

He could have made the difference, seriously.

[Smudge]

But Holloway told BBC Radio Leicester: "We have now been told we can't have him. Chelsea do not want to let him go to a team that's where we are.

Why Holloway has to report it in that way or even at all beggers belief.

Another public shaming of the team and an embarassment for the club; this man has the political guile of Derek Trotter.

[Corky]

We're not good enough hey? Bet they were saying that with two minutes to go at Stamford Bridge in October, and their quadruple hopes were falling apart.

Of course Qpr are fighting it out for promotion aren't they?

[Fox You Forest]

Why Holloway has to report it in that way or even at all beggers belief.

Another public shaming of the team and an embarassment for the club; this man has the political guile of Derek Trotter.

What a plonker!

[Joe.]

Surely the main thing is to get first team football for him?

And like others have said, at the time Plymouth and QPR especially were hardly setting the league alight were they?

Although saying that, they're probably expecting somebody in and around the playoffs to come in for him. There's surely got to be more interest than just us in all of this?

[dandannieldanok]

We're not good enough hey? Bet they were saying that with two minutes to go at Stamford Bridge in October, and their quadruple hopes were falling apart.

Of course Qpr are fighting it out for promotion aren't they?

Well a few more wins will put them in the play-off frame so yes they could well be.

[Babylon]

Why Holloway has to report it in that way or even at all beggers belief.

Another public shaming of the team and an embarassment for the club; this man has the political guile of Derek Trotter.

Hardly.

[ronnup]

why send him here to run up and down a spud field watching the ball get hoofed back and fourth?

Really can't blame em. we are too shit.

[Smudge]

Hardly.

Presumably the response from Chelsea that "we weren't good enough"' was a private conversation. Why would he make it public, what's the advantage? He slights his team publicly and gives all others, the opportunity to crow.

[RizLCFC]

We don't want him, Chelsea are just being twats, I hope he breaks his leg next week, how can they see we are not good enough, okay results and position in the table back them up on that, but, surely he has a chance of being a star player in our team, if he went to a team vying for play offs they already probably have Sinclairs quality of players if not better, am appaulled that Chelsea had to slag us off in this way, they could have just rejected our interest rather than slating us, there star studied line up nearly lost to us and would have if it wasn't for misfit Sheva, and, also Martin O'Neill when is he going to loan Osbourne to us, we need someone like him asap and we've had to wait since January 10th and still no sign of him, Martin snapped up a couple of midfielders in January and he still holds onto him, what a nerd he's turning out to be!

[Nath]

So bad, that near enough their 1st team only beat us by the 1 goal, at their gaff.

[Babylon]

Presumably the response from Chelsea that "we weren't good enough"' was a private conversation. Why would he make it public, what's the advantage? He slights his team publicly and gives all others, the opportunity to crow.

If the idiots haven't already realised we are rubbish then god help us. It's the response I personally had been expecting from Chelsea, and one anyone without an ounce of sense would have also.

Once again people are making a mountain out of a mole hill.

[Joe.]

We don't want him

Yes we do. We're desperate for a player like him.

[Smudge]

If the idiots haven't already realised we are rubbish then god help us. It's the response I personally had been expecting from Chelsea, and one anyone without an ounce of sense would have also.

Once again people are making a mountain out of a mole hill.

Exactly........and to no advantage, so why did he mention it.

[Simi]

We don't want him, Chelsea are just being twats, I hope he breaks his leg next week

Some of the most stupid words I've read in a while.

It doesn't say anything about Sinclair not wanting to come to us, it was Chelsea's decsion. Why would they want to send a good talent to us anyway? We seem to have murdered off plenty of it already. We'd know doubt just damage his career. If I didn't support Leicester I'd say this was a good decsion from Chelsea.

[Babylon]

Exactly........and to no advantage, so why did he mention it.

Why not.. what's it matter. It's hardly earth shattering news that we aren't in with a shout of the play offs.

[Darkzzz_]

Oh Well thats the end of that one....

We just aint good enough....

[Bryn]

Agree with the people saying why did he report it like this... Chelsea have every right to be as selective as that and Ollie didn't need to make it public because I'm sure they wouldn't have done. Unprofessional.