Thracian Posted 6 August 2008 Posted 6 August 2008 No. Nobody cares. Look to the future Thracian instead of bringing up the past. I've looked to the future for years. It's our chairman seems to constantly look to the past and he's not short of encouragement on here, as if it's not done us enough harm.
Matt Posted 6 August 2008 Posted 6 August 2008 Hope he clocks you one if you do, no need for that really. You're not the only one that got annoyed he left, but this is a bit too far.I'm sure you'd stay in a job that's not as attractive and less money if something bigger and better comes along. I hope so too. I'd be claiming something from his first weeks wages if he did I probably would leave if something bigger and better came along however i've not got 30,000+ people i'd be lying to before I left and he was lying because if you believe reports (Which I do) he knew he was going weeks before the end of that season. Fair enough he was caught of guard when Birch asked him "So you'll be staying to help us next season?"....what was so hard about saying "We'll see what happens over the summer?", or "Hopefully" e.t.c, by some people no doubt he'd still have been slagged off (Whether he went or not) after saying that kind of thing but i'd have a hell of alot more respect for him and other footballers if they said such things. Hume did something even more stupid tbh, No-one even asked whether he was staying or not he made his own statement on the OS. For some reason, Maybe i'm alot older and wiser but i'm not as annoyed about Hume, I had some much hate for Dickov at the time when he left, I just cannot forgive and forget what he did or eat my own words back from those years ago...i'll admit, i'm stubborn, at the same time what I plan to say should I see him is fact, simple as.
The Reverend Posted 6 August 2008 Posted 6 August 2008 I hope so too. I'd be claiming something from his first weeks wages if he did I probably would leave if something bigger and better came along however i've not got 30,000+ people i'd be lying to before I left and he was lying because if you believe reports (Which I do) he knew he was going weeks before the end of that season. Fair enough he was caught of guard when Birch asked him "So you'll be staying to help us next season?"....what was so hard about saying "We'll see what happens over the summer?", or "Hopefully" e.t.c, by some people no doubt he'd still have been slagged off (Whether he went or not) after saying that kind of thing but i'd have a hell of alot more respect for him and other footballers if they said such things. Hume did something even more stupid tbh, No-one even asked whether he was staying or not he made his own statement on the OS. For some reason, Maybe i'm alot older and wiser but i'm not as annoyed about Hume, I had some much hate for Dickov at the time when he left, I just cannot forgive and forget what he did or eat my own words back from those years ago...i'll admit, i'm stubborn, at the same time what I plan to say should I see him is fact, simple as. Thats because Hume really is'nt that good, not a genuine goalscorer in the Championship. Dickov was, and that is priceless.
Fez of Mahrez Posted 6 August 2008 Posted 6 August 2008 I hope so too. I'd be claiming something from his first weeks wages if he did I probably would leave if something bigger and better came along however i've not got 30,000+ people i'd be lying to before I left and he was lying because if you believe reports (Which I do) he knew he was going weeks before the end of that season. Fair enough he was caught of guard when Birch asked him "So you'll be staying to help us next season?"....what was so hard about saying "We'll see what happens over the summer?", or "Hopefully" e.t.c, by some people no doubt he'd still have been slagged off (Whether he went or not) after saying that kind of thing but i'd have a hell of alot more respect for him and other footballers if they said such things. Hume did something even more stupid tbh, No-one even asked whether he was staying or not he made his own statement on the OS. For some reason, Maybe i'm alot older and wiser but i'm not as annoyed about Hume, I had some much hate for Dickov at the time when he left, I just cannot forgive and forget what he did or eat my own words back from those years ago...i'll admit, i'm stubborn, at the same time what I plan to say should I see him is fact, simple as.
Babylon Posted 6 August 2008 Posted 6 August 2008 At least he got into a position to miss which is more than many have done at Leicester in recent seasons. And do you want me to detail some of the woeful misses of the last 12 months by older players? Like Howard's header at Luton and his penalty. I know which list will be longer. Hook line and sinker. Highlight ALL of the post you replied to.
Fez of Mahrez Posted 6 August 2008 Posted 6 August 2008 You really believe he rolled up at the website editor's office and asked him to put up a piece about how he was definitely staying?
Matt Posted 6 August 2008 Posted 6 August 2008 You really believe he rolled up at the website editor's office and asked him to put up a piece about how he was definitely staying? He obviously had a part to play. Anyone could put " " around some words but i'm fairly sure those words/quotes came from his mouth or were written down by him, I know if the club, whomever put an article like that up and I knew I was on my way or there was possibility I'd be going I certainly wouldn't be happy.
Fez of Mahrez Posted 6 August 2008 Posted 6 August 2008 He obviously had a part to play. Anyone could put " " around some words but i'm fairly sure those words/quotes came from his mouth or were written down by him, I know if the club, whomever put an article like that up and I knew I was on my way or there was possibility I'd be going I certainly wouldn't be happy. Come on, you're halfway there. Deep down you know how much he really had to do with that article. You just want to rail against the players for any possible reason. As for Dickov, he had a microphone shoved under his nose in front of 25,000 Leicester fans. It was hardly the crime of the century to move to a Premiership team. I wish some of our fans would think things through a bit more.
Corky Posted 6 August 2008 Posted 6 August 2008 Come on, you're halfway there. Deep down you know how much he really had to do with that article. You just want to rail against the players for any possible reason.As for Dickov, he had a microphone shoved under his nose in front of 25,000 Leicester fans. It was hardly the crime of the century to move to a Premiership team. I wish some of our fans would think things through a bit more. Leicester fans aren't known for their rational thinking
Fox You Forest Posted 6 August 2008 Posted 6 August 2008 Deal complete. Ignore them Any idea when he will be unveiled?
ohmy6od2 Posted 6 August 2008 Posted 6 August 2008 Where's the source then? Yeah because everyone reveals that don't they
ohmy6od2 Posted 6 August 2008 Posted 6 August 2008 Ignore them Any idea when he will be unveiled? Tomorrow. Not sure if AM or PM ... deal was only completed about 90 mins ago.
C-man Posted 6 August 2008 Posted 6 August 2008 Yeah because everyone reveals that don't they Erm, well if you want to be believed, a source would help? How do you know your information?
Daggers Posted 6 August 2008 Posted 6 August 2008 Come on, you're halfway there. Deep down you know how much he really had to do with that article. You just want to rail against the players for any possible reason.As for Dickov, he had a microphone shoved under his nose in front of 25,000 Leicester fans. It was hardly the crime of the century to move to a Premiership team. I wish some of our fans would think things through a bit more. Are you cpomfportable with this yet?
ohmy6od2 Posted 6 August 2008 Posted 6 August 2008 Erm, well if you want to be believed, a source would help? How do you know your information? Im sorry, but you don't reveal source names. Thats a fact! Even when Sky news have information it's always 'Our sources are saying etc ..' Do you e-mail them and ask who their sources are ? Why don't you look at my previous posts? My only dodgy bit to date is the Gregory story, however I stand by what I posted on that as it was true at the time.
Asha Posted 6 August 2008 Posted 6 August 2008 Im sorry, but you don't reveal source names. Thats a fact!Even when Sky news have information it's always 'Our sources are saying etc ..' Do you e-mail them and ask who their sources are ? Why don't you look at my previous posts? My only dodgy bit to date is the Gregory story, however I stand by what I posted on that as it was true at the time. I think your the guy who said we would start MK Dons home, Stockport away before the fixtures were released. So you do have a history for getting it right.
ohmy6od2 Posted 6 August 2008 Posted 6 August 2008 I think your the guy who said we would start MK Dons home, Stockport away before the fixtures were released. So you do have a history for getting it right. And that Megson had gone before it was confirmed .... and Ollie was coming in
jonno24 Posted 6 August 2008 Posted 6 August 2008 Yeah because everyone reveals that don't they Yeah but if the deal isnt done then you will look like a noob for saying the deal is done. If your source is someones friend who is mates with Paul Dickovs dog then you obviously arent going to reveal it. But if it is a really reliable source then you arent going to lose anything by releasing the info
C-man Posted 6 August 2008 Posted 6 August 2008 Im sorry, but you don't reveal source names. Thats a fact!Even when Sky news have information it's always 'Our sources are saying etc ..' Do you e-mail them and ask who their sources are ? Why don't you look at my previous posts? My only dodgy bit to date is the Gregory story, however I stand by what I posted on that as it was true at the time. I was expecting you to say Sky or BBC, like it had been made official. I don't e-mail sky because I trust their information slightly more than someone who posts on an internet forum ! Maybe my trust is misguided! Sorry I hadn't actually read any of your previous posts hence why I was skeptical.
ohmy6od2 Posted 6 August 2008 Posted 6 August 2008 Yeah but if the deal isnt done then you will look like a noob for saying the deal is done.If your source is someones friend who is mates with Paul Dickovs dog then you obviously arent going to reveal it. But if it is a really reliable source then you arent going to lose anything by releasing the info Are you insane? Me revealing their name could very very damaging. Just say for instance it's someone at the club in a position to know whats going on, do you think the guy at the top would be too pleased if he knew his employee was releasing info on the sly? No not at all. Sources will always remain as sources!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.