flanimal Posted 29 July 2009 Posted 29 July 2009 I think the damage was done a long time ago Sometime around the Cox/N'Guessan saga, I pretty much wrote my own twat licence.
Tilley Posted 29 July 2009 Posted 29 July 2009 Sometime around the Cox/N'Guessan saga, I pretty much wrote my own twat licence. At least you admit it.
flanimal Posted 29 July 2009 Posted 29 July 2009 Maybe I should ask Bert to look in his crystal ball and find out how many non-twatty posts it will take to redeem myself.
Nick Posted 29 July 2009 Posted 29 July 2009 Maybe I should ask Bert to look in his crystal ball and find out how many non-twatty posts it will take to redeem myself. Just put your hands against the wall and wait until everybody's finished. Foxestalk prison can be a rough ride.
Brainy Posted 29 July 2009 Posted 29 July 2009 Problem is in all of the transfer talk threads, posts go: flanimal member #1 flanimal member #2 flanimal member #3 flanimal member #2 flanimal member #3 member #2 flanimal flanimal flanimal
flanimal Posted 29 July 2009 Posted 29 July 2009 Yeah, well, that's just enthusiasm. The real point you need to make is that at least hald of those 'flanimal posts' usually say pretty much the same thing! It's OK, I'm learning. Anyway, this thread shouldn't be about me - keep it Kermo!
Babylon Posted 29 July 2009 Posted 29 July 2009 I think the damage was done a long time ago Sometime around the Cox/N'Guessan saga, I pretty much wrote my own twat licence.
Babylon Posted 29 July 2009 Posted 29 July 2009 Bonjour Monsieur Kermorgant Unfortunately that site means nothing, they get their information from here.
Edmund Posted 29 July 2009 Posted 29 July 2009 Unfortunately that site means nothing, they get their information from here. Doesn't Joe post there stories? Does he know something we don't? Was he seen in Morrisons this lunchtime
Joe. Posted 29 July 2009 Posted 29 July 2009 Doesn't Joe post there stories?Does he know something we don't? Was he seen in Morrisons this lunchtime Correct. I haven't suggested I know anything more, other than that I trust Bert with his goods. I only put stuff like that up there if it's pretty much nailed on.
Edmund Posted 29 July 2009 Posted 29 July 2009 Correct. I haven't suggested I know anything more, other than that I trust Bert with his goods. I only put stuff like that up there if it's pretty much nailed on.
flanimal Posted 29 July 2009 Posted 29 July 2009 Is there a good chance he could be signed in time to play Real Vallodolid? (or however you spell it)
mmarkie Posted 29 July 2009 Posted 29 July 2009 Is there a good chance he could be signed in time to play Real Vallodolid? (or however you spell it) Apparently so, according to BBC 606, however only person I really trust off this is Jimbo.
flanimal Posted 29 July 2009 Posted 29 July 2009 Erm no mate, as you saw last night, we were both on at the same time. Maybe you have a laptop and a PC?
escos Posted 29 July 2009 Posted 29 July 2009 Erm no mate, as you saw last night, we were both on at the same time. No sex for either of you then!!!
Jimbo Posted 29 July 2009 Posted 29 July 2009 I hope he isn't shit... There is a good chance that he may be, shall we say not very good. But we'll have to wait and see won't we. Our scouting network hasn't really let us down so far though so there must be something good about the guy. I wouldn't say he's the answer to our lack of pace up front but he certainly brings something new. And by looks of things we've finally got someone who can take a decent corner.
Fox in a Box Posted 29 July 2009 Posted 29 July 2009 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yann_Kermorgant Im hearing its personal terms then a done deal.
StanSP Posted 29 July 2009 Posted 29 July 2009 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yann_KermorgantIm hearing its personal terms then a done deal. Anything can be edited on Wiki.
Heart-Shaped Fox Posted 29 July 2009 Posted 29 July 2009 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yann_KermorgantIm hearing its personal terms then a done deal. If wikipedia says he is than he must be. More reliable than football rumours that is.
flanimal Posted 29 July 2009 Posted 29 July 2009 The fact that Leicester City is not a linked word on that page is a massive give away it's false. It may be true of course, just that Wikipedia page is bogus.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.