Father Ted Posted 15 November 2009 Posted 15 November 2009 Oh here he is the worthless serb arsehole is back fresh after getting a hard on after our patch work quilt of a second string lost in a friendly to the clear favourites for the World Cup, truly laughable Oh shut up you worthless piece of crap.
BlueSi13 Posted 15 November 2009 Posted 15 November 2009 Oh shut up you worthless piece of crap. lol No you shut up worthless!
lcfc_jme Posted 15 November 2009 Posted 15 November 2009 Must suck to hate your own country? :yawn: I don't know you, and to be quite honest I don't care for your opinion or judgment either, it's as insignificant as you are to me.
Father Ted Posted 15 November 2009 Posted 15 November 2009 lol No you shut up worthless! Read what JME said.
Samilktray Posted 15 November 2009 Posted 15 November 2009 Read what JME said. Yeah but his opinion did matter to you, thats why you turned into Rambo.
Father Ted Posted 15 November 2009 Posted 15 November 2009 Yeah but his opinion did matter to you, thats why you turned into Rambo. Ok lardarse
The Doctor Posted 15 November 2009 Posted 15 November 2009 Problem is the World Cup isn't ONE game - it's a SEVEN game tournament. Worse still, more than half of these are KNOCK OUT fixtures with EXTRA TIME & PENALTIES - a triple whammy for England's nightspot brawling, bimbo roasting, binge drinking buffoons. Cold it might be - unfortunately those Antarctic blasts will be less of an advantage at altitude (so if they do a slow mo of Gerard's ample arse crossing the half way line it'll look like a freeze frame).England is a team that is considerably less than the sum of its parts. Many of its 'talents' are in fact over-rated - playing as they do for clubs that are successful largely because of their foreign stars - midgets standing on the shoulders of giants. This so called 'golden generation' is no such thing. In fact it's considerable less gifted than your 1990 crew (Gascoigne, Waddle, Barnes, Beardsley & co) so incompetently managed by the late and not so great Sir Bobby Robson. Serbia may not win the World Cup but we will play the same one touch/first time passing game that all the real pedigree teams play. The sort of football England can't and won't play. The sort of football your ****wit pundits can't see. The sort of football the Ingermong hordes just simply don't get (proof of that is that nobody else on this forum ever discusses this subject) The correct analogy to draw between England and the Premier League would be to compare them say to a side like Aston Villa (and boy that's being generous). Only when the prevailing order is swept away in some biblical flood would they ever have a prayer of landing the title. The only way England could win in South Africa would be by deploying underhand methods off the pitch if you get my meaning. Like those used (by others) in '34 '54 '78 '98 '02 and possibly one or two other tournaments (NOT '66 - just to show how fair minded I am). and who have you played against recently? The style to play depends on the opposition, perhaps against those international heavywieghts of latvia you have the room to play pass and move football but it only really works when there is a reasonable gulf in class (view the argies at 06 - played pass and move against the serbians (big gulf in class) but not against holland (no gulf in class)). the sign of a good team is to play rubbish and still win (as england have been doing fairly regularly for many a year). to only lose by one goal against a brazil side that was missing, at most, 3-4 first teamers using a second string squad is a clear indicator that england will do fairly well in south africa if a: they have their first team fit & b: they drop foster. (don't even bother saying that i'm a biased fool who just blindly supports his country without seeing them for what the truely are - i'm a scotland fan and as a result when the international fixtures come around i support two nations - scotland & whoever england are playing).
Father Ted Posted 15 November 2009 Posted 15 November 2009 and who have you played against recently? The style to play depends on the opposition, perhaps against those international heavywieghts of latvia you have the room to play pass and move football but it only really works when there is a reasonable gulf in class (view the argies at 06 - played pass and move against the serbians (big gulf in class) but not against holland (no gulf in class)). the sign of a good team is to play rubbish and still win (as england have been doing fairly regularly for many a year). to only lose by one goal against a brazil side that was missing, at most, 3-4 first teamers using a second string squad is a clear indicator that england will do fairly well in south africa if a: they have their first team fit & b: they drop foster. (don't even bother saying that i'm a biased fool who just blindly supports his country without seeing them for what the truely are - i'm a scotland fan and as a result when the international fixtures come around i support two nations - scotland & whoever england are playing). We hammered the Romanians 5-0. Draw with the French. We beat Northern Ireland on their own patch - something many teams struggle to do. Serbia are a quality passing team, all down to the master Raddy Antic.
The Doctor Posted 15 November 2009 Posted 15 November 2009 We hammered the Romanians 5-0. Draw with the French. We beat Northern Ireland on their own patch - something many teams struggle to do. Serbia are a quality passing team, all down to the master Raddy Antic. great absolutely top notch. now then have you played against any decent teams other than N.I recently?
BlueSi13 Posted 15 November 2009 Posted 15 November 2009 :yawn: I don't know you, and to be quite honest I don't care for your opinion or judgment either, it's as insignificant as you are to me. Ermmmm...its an internet forum? your not supposed to know me? I thought i asked a perfectly good question and i didn't actually offer an opinion, so theres no need to get all defensive petal. But clearly your an amazing superstar type guy so ill just wish you all the best with your self-hating, i thought the Germans were bad but you've shown me a whole new level! It must be crippling enough without people asking you about it. All the breast.
BlueSi13 Posted 15 November 2009 Posted 15 November 2009 We hammered the Romanians 5-0. Draw with the French. We beat Northern Ireland on their own patch - something many teams struggle to do. Serbia are a quality passing team, all down to the master Raddy Antic. West Brom were a good passing team, didn't stop them bottoming out of the Premier League last year. Saying your a passing team means nothing and the ones that tend use that phrase to death tend to be the ones that try and hide their otherwise mediocracy. Btw well played on beating NI 1-0, it is true that playing them at Windsor Park is no easy prospect as we and Spain will testify, although we both played them in competitive fixtures, a friendly there with a placid atmosphere is a different prospect entirely. It wasn't a killer statement Serbia made. However I do believe they have a prospect of being the Croatia of this World Cup if teams underestimate them.
lildave3 Posted 15 November 2009 Posted 15 November 2009 Northern Ireland and Romania ! Those giants of football!
Finnegan Posted 15 November 2009 Posted 15 November 2009 So the Rafa FACT that England use the long speculative punt more than any other team, the FACT that they can't pass first time, the FACT they have only ever won ONE penalty shoot out of SIX (and don't realise it's their keepers that lose them -not the takers) the FACT that their idiotic high defensive lines get caught out time and time again is 'flat out bile' is it? These deficiencies plus a number of others (indiscipline and low fitness levels amongst them) have all been cited by sports scientists as reasons why England do so poorly in major tournaments. So, hoofball isn't effective and trundling around in possession doesn't work (your statement 'if it's effective it works' is a tautology - you're either too pissed to think logically or you're just as irrational sober as the disabled majority here). Out of the seven WC winning nations England's record is the poorest. And only their HOME victory in a short tournament prevents them being ranked lower in the international record than countries like Holland, Hungary, former Czechoslovakia, former Yugoslavia, Spain, Russia and even Greece. And the reason why they are so abysmal is because they can't learn and they can't adapt. This means that countries with scant resources and small populations (like Serbia) who play the correct way can ride a favourable demographic wave every decade or so and embarrass England. And, conversely, because England play the wrong way even with its enormous resources (more than any other footballing nation on earth) and its relatively large population it cannot take advantage when the right individuals come along. And that Finners isn't flat out bile - it's a scientific Benitez FACT.
Webbo Posted 15 November 2009 Posted 15 November 2009 Somehow, no. Hey, I'm not criticizing you. Germany have won the world and European cup in the last twenty years. What have England won? I'm just glad that Leicester won those league cups all those years ago or we might have lost you to a Chelsea forum.
lcfc_jme Posted 15 November 2009 Posted 15 November 2009 Ermmmm...its an internet forum? your not supposed to know me?I thought i asked a perfectly good question and i didn't actually offer an opinion, so theres no need to get all defensive petal. But clearly your an amazing superstar type guy so ill just wish you all the best with your self-hating, i thought the Germans were bad but you've shown me a whole new level! It must be crippling enough without people asking you about it. All the breast. A) I know it's an internet forum. B) I know a lot of people on this internet forum in the flesh. C) I'm glad you think I'm a superstar. D) I don't hate myself. E) I'm not German. F) Glad I could show you something new. G) I'm not crippled, far from it. H) Thanks. Hey, I'm not criticizing you. Germany have won the world and European cup in the last twenty years. What have England won?I'm just glad that Leicester won those league cups all those years ago or we might have lost you to a Chelsea forum. See point E above. And yes, the reason I support Leicester City is because we won a couple of League Cups. Definitely.
Webbo Posted 15 November 2009 Posted 15 November 2009 E) I'm not German.See point E above. I never said you were German, most Man U fans aren't from Manchester. What's your point?
Finnegan Posted 15 November 2009 Posted 15 November 2009 Wait... what's with the Germany thing? I thought the point was that Jamie didn't support a national football team or that he didn't consider himself English and hence didn't follow England. What has Germany got to do with anything?
Webbo Posted 15 November 2009 Posted 15 November 2009 What? I don't buy all this "I'm supposed to care for the National side" bullsh*t. I'd love to see them fail. If that makes me German, then so be it.
Radovan's Caravan Posted 16 November 2009 Posted 16 November 2009 Wasn't their skipper and 'nandy' abuser Zago on your books at one time? Finners, the Greeks triumph at Euro 2004 was a great one and should not be mocked. If I recollect correctly they beat the Portugeezers on their own soil twice over ninety minutes. More down to defensive organisation perhaps than flair but still an amazing feat for a small country regarded as a footballing backwater. Looking at some recent footage of 'Plaid Taffry' I noticed that the style of the PRINCIPALITY was more recognizeably European (if there is such a thing) than any of the nations making up the British Isles. If you egg chasing converts can play the proper way why can't your neighbours?
Finnegan Posted 16 November 2009 Posted 16 November 2009 Who's mocking Greece? I'm simply pointing out that anything can happen. Something you're doing your best to sidestep by baiting me on the validity of Wales. Because at the end of the day I'm right and you've got absolutely dick-all idea how far either England or Serbia will go in the World Cup.
leicesterfox86 Posted 16 November 2009 Posted 16 November 2009 What did you make of the Brazil game? Personally I don't think it was a game we can judge much on in terms of our World Cup chances. So many players were out. If anything, it showed who wasn't up to it. This football blog on the World Cup highlights some names that didn't do there chances of playing next summer any favours. Interesting who they suggest was the only player to shine - James Milner. He did Ok didn't he? Still not sure he will get in the squad ahead of the likes of Walcott, Beckham and Lennon though..... thoughts??
The Doctor Posted 16 November 2009 Posted 16 November 2009 Wait... what's with the Germany thing? I thought the point was that Jamie didn't support a national football team or that he didn't consider himself English and hence didn't follow England.What has Germany got to do with anything? apperently if you live in england but don't support england then you are officialy german.
Daggers Posted 16 November 2009 Posted 16 November 2009 Who cares? We'd still beat Serbia. He's not Serbian. Jeez - get with the program. He's a pissy little troll and you are doing nothing more than feeding his desire to be noticed.
Guest Bilo Posted 16 November 2009 Posted 16 November 2009 For fook's sake, are people still feeding that fake Serb troll?!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.