davieG Posted 23 October 2010 Author Posted 23 October 2010 i meant, only an idiot like him would come to any sort of conclusion (or even reference) , that working to save a historic bridge , could in any way be linked to Nazism or racism that's all i'm saying , maybe not explaining it too well though , i had a late night Ve haf vays of making you! Fully understand now
sdb Posted 24 October 2010 Posted 24 October 2010 Ultra is a willy puller who drops his trousers in front of kids and did he used to post on here? or have i completely made that up?! cheers btw!
Finnegan Posted 24 October 2010 Posted 24 October 2010 and did he used to post on here? or have i completely made that up?! cheers btw! The Mayor of Leicester, Cllr Colin Hall of the New Parks ward, posts on Foxes Talk under the alias "Ultra", yes. He has done so for pretty much the entire life time of the website, even pre-dating his rise to politics. Since becoming Mayor he's had the common sense to almost cease posting - probably in the hope that, having proven they'll raid his Twitter to make a story, no unscrupulous journalist will start sifting through his FT postings in order to further make him look a pratt. I, for one, would LOVE to see the Mockery raiding his post history for lulz. But then I'm cruel.
Jimmy Posted 24 October 2010 Posted 24 October 2010 are the mercury even aware that he posted on here, I.E. does anyone other then the sports people read this site
Brainy Posted 24 October 2010 Posted 24 October 2010 surely manwell would have made some newspaper aware of Ultra's posts
Thracian Posted 24 October 2010 Posted 24 October 2010 The Mayor of Leicester, Cllr Colin Hall of the New Parks ward, posts on Foxes Talk under the alias "Ultra", yes. He has done so for pretty much the entire life time of the website, even pre-dating his rise to politics. Since becoming Mayor he's had the common sense to almost cease posting - probably in the hope that, having proven they'll raid his Twitter to make a story, no unscrupulous journalist will start sifting through his FT postings in order to further make him look a pratt. I, for one, would LOVE to see the Mockery raiding his post history for lulz. But then I'm cruel. The bloke's not worth the effort. It's bad enough that he's besmirched the name of the mayoral office throughout his time with his actions and resulting publicity and many that I've spoken to will be glad to see his term come to an end. You can never be sure about his labour colleagues though. Some crony will probably put him forward for a knighthood next...if only to show what they think of knighthoods!
skinnydipper Posted 24 October 2010 Posted 24 October 2010 The bloke's not worth the effort. It's bad enough that he's besmirched the name of the mayoral office throughout his time with his actions and resulting publicity and many that I've spoken to will be glad to see his term come to an end. You can never be sure about his labour colleagues though. Some crony will probably put him forward for a knighthood next...if only to show what he thinks of knighthoods! When I first joined this forum I thought you two were mates, allied against the Swan Lestas. So I conclude that either my perception was wrong or you've had a fallout
Thracian Posted 24 October 2010 Posted 24 October 2010 When I first joined this forum I thought you two were mates, allied against the Swan Lestas. So I conclude that either my perception was wrong or you've had a fallout My shoulders are broad enough to take most any insult but I've never quite acquired the habit of forgiving people who bully or insult my friends. Ironic really considering Ultra and I only became acquainted because, although I disagreed with him so much, I disliked people ganging up on him. I guess i don't like to see anyone bullied. Not even Ultra.
Finnegan Posted 24 October 2010 Posted 24 October 2010 I guess i don't like to see anyone bullied. Bit ironic from someone with a dubious posting history in regards the British National Party.
Thracian Posted 24 October 2010 Posted 24 October 2010 Bit ironic from someone with a dubious posting history in regards the British National Party. Care to explain? Just because I see the damage Labour has done to this country as far worse than anything the BNP will ever get the chance to do doesn't mean I'm sympathetic to or supporting of the BNP in any way, including its bully element. Yes, I pointed out that Labour lies and Labour policies were driving people into the arms of the BNP and others of that ilk. But why would stating the truth be "dubious" - and "dubious" by whose judgement? The bullying, reactionary thought police of the Left? You've long known my views on Labour and the provenly dishonest but systematic devaluing/disregarding of white-British working class people by the very party that was supposed to stand their corner. We will always disagree so there's little point pretending otherwise. But please don't hint at something at something that is patently and demonstrably untrue. Cos I can state hand on heart that I have never voted for the odious BNP. But I don't think you can swear that you have never voted for the Labour Party I've described.
Finnegan Posted 25 October 2010 Posted 25 October 2010 But I don't think you can swear that you have never voted for the Labour Party I've described. I never have, in either a European or General election - I wouldn't describe myself as a Labour supporter and nor would I describe New Labour as left-wing. My first ever Council vote went to the Labour representative in my ward in Charnwood. The Tories are pretty much a cert to walk in and I'd rather see a Labour councillor in power than a Conservative one, yes. But then I think you've got to be a complete moron to think that Labour are a greater evil than the BNP or that someone should be more ashamed of voting Labour than the BNP. You should be well and truly old enough, Thracian, to know that both of the country's major parties have soured the longer they've stayed in office, it's the natural cycle of politics. Few will deny that Labour went rotten as did Thatcher/Major's Tories. The true blight of our system is that there isn't really much of an alternative.
Wymsey Posted 25 October 2010 Posted 25 October 2010 My grandad used to be lord mayor of Leic (20 odd years back) same weight as this retard who is mayor now yet his trousers didn't fall off. Glad he didn't as he was board member of lcfc and longtime friend of Jack Wallace
Alexikokopops Posted 25 October 2010 Posted 25 October 2010 My grandad used to be lord mayor of Leic (20 odd years back) same weight as this retard who is mayor now yet his trousers didn't fall off. Glad he didn't as he was board member of lcfc and longtime friend of Jack Wallace Friendly enough to know his name was Jock?
Wymsey Posted 25 October 2010 Posted 25 October 2010 Friendly enough to know his name was Jock? Sorry!!
Finnegan Posted 25 October 2010 Posted 25 October 2010 Friendly enough to know his name was Jock? No he meant Jack. Jack Wallace used to clean the toilets at Filbert Street and was famous for his skills with papier-mache.
Thracian Posted 25 October 2010 Posted 25 October 2010 But then I think you've got to be a complete moron to think that Labour are a greater evil than the BNP or that someone should be more ashamed of voting Labour than the BNP. You should be well and truly old enough, Thracian, to know that both of the country's major parties have soured the longer they've stayed in office, it's the natural cycle of politics. How convenient, in drawing your conclusion about complete morons, that you conveniently twisted what I actually said and replaced it with a variation that suited what you wanted to say but subtly changed the meaning of my words. My point was that votes for Labour might well have returned another Labour government and subjected us to more of their disreputable mismanagement while a vote for the BNP, though shameful, would be unlikely to have any political effect. But let me be quite clear. I believe Labour are as great an evil as the BNP (not a greater evil) because I see no difference in the unacceptability of persecuting immigrants than devaluing/discriminating against or victimising white natives through what is simply racist behaviour of a different kind. I don't agree with racial discrimination of any sort. Should I, by your inference of suggesting I'm a moron, assume that you don't mind such racism? Or is it just that you refuse to see it as that? Similarly regarding voting - I don't see greater shame in voting Labour than BNP because I really see no difference except that the BNP's racism is effectively acknowledged in their policies while Labour's is hidden or glossed over... Just as Labour, by their down admission, repeatedly deceived the country over the reality of immigration levels at a time of such shameful levels of unemployment. As for political cycles I really don't give a toss about past history of that kind. I'm interested in fair, honest and transparent government for all. If you consider that moronic then by all means persuade me of a better kind.
Finnegan Posted 25 October 2010 Posted 25 October 2010 How convenient, in drawing your conclusion about complete morons, that you conveniently twisted what I actually said and replaced it with a variation that suited what you wanted to say but subtly changed the meaning of my words.But let me be quite clear. I believe Labour are as great an evil as the BNP (not a greater evil) Oh you do make me giggle. I wickedly twisted your words to meet my own criteria, you'd never say such a thing, but oh wait, I'm right, that is what you meant? Dear me. My point was that votes for Labour might well have returned another Labour government Unlikely in a Council election I'd say. If you were talking about the General Election then I refer you to my previous post, no, I've never voted Labour. The rest of your post I'm not even bothering with. You can be smug and attempt to celebrate that as a victory by default if you want but I'm pretty sure you're intelligent enough to know I don't give a toss and I'm not exactly going to lose face by failing to dignify your lunatic ramblings about some anti-white conspiratorial government with an answer.
FoxyPV Posted 25 October 2010 Posted 25 October 2010 But let me be quite clear. I believe Labour are as great an evil as the BNP (not a greater evil) because I see no difference in the unacceptability of persecuting immigrants than devaluing/discriminating against or victimising white natives through what is simply racist behaviour of a different kind. Why just the white working class? Labour fooked over the entire working class regardless of colour etc by chasing the business vote.
Finnegan Posted 25 October 2010 Posted 25 October 2010 Why just the white working class? Labour fooked over the entire working class regardless of colour etc by chasing the business vote. Because it's the same, tired, far-right rhetoric you get from nearly ever BNP / UKIP / EDL / NF / whatever apologist. Thracian has "plenty of ethnic friends, but..." as well and really only wants a "fair and balanced society," apparently. Just his ideas of fair and balanced usually tend to see the poor, suffering white 'natives' given that little extra, yknow? Funny how the highest ethnic populated areas in the country tend to be some of the poorest while all of the wealthiest are exclusively white. God, it really was hard being white in Labour's Britain...
Jackirius Posted 25 October 2010 Posted 25 October 2010 Is this thread just 21 pages of bullshit or is Ultra actually lord mayor?
Finnegan Posted 25 October 2010 Posted 25 October 2010 Is this thread just 21 pages of bullshit or is Ultra actually lord mayor? The Mayor of Leicester, Cllr Colin Hall of the New Parks ward, posts on Foxes Talk under the alias "Ultra", yes. He has done so for pretty much the entire life time of the website, even pre-dating his rise to politics. Since becoming Mayor he's had the common sense to almost cease posting - probably in the hope that, having proven they'll raid his Twitter to make a story, no unscrupulous journalist will start sifting through his FT postings in order to further make him look a pratt. I, for one, would LOVE to see the Mockery raiding his post history for lulz. But then I'm cruel.
Houdini Logic Posted 25 October 2010 Posted 25 October 2010 But let me be quite clear. I believe Labour are as great an evil as the BNP (not a greater evil) because I see no difference in the unacceptability of persecuting immigrants than devaluing/discriminating against or victimising white natives through what is simply racist behaviour of a different kind. I'm sure the leader of the Labour party, born from Polish Jewish immigrant parents who survived the holocaust, would completely agree with you
Thracian Posted 26 October 2010 Posted 26 October 2010 Because it's the same, tired, far-right rhetoric you get from nearly ever BNP / UKIP / EDL / NF / whatever apologist. Thracian has "plenty of ethnic friends, but..." as well and really only wants a "fair and balanced society," apparently. Just his ideas of fair and balanced usually tend to see the poor, suffering white 'natives' given that little extra, yknow? Funny how the highest ethnic populated areas in the country tend to be some of the poorest while all of the wealthiest are exclusively white. God, it really was hard being white in Labour's Britain... Forever denying the truthfully undeniable...and throwing in snide innuendo that is demonstrably untrue to help deflect from the truth.
Thracian Posted 26 October 2010 Posted 26 October 2010 Care to explain? Just because I see the damage Labour has done to this country as far worse than anything the BNP will ever get the chance to do doesn't mean I'm sympathetic to or supporting of the BNP in any way, including its bully element. Yes, I pointed out that Labour lies and Labour policies were driving people into the arms of the BNP and others of that ilk. But why would stating the truth be "dubious" - and "dubious" by whose judgement? The bullying, reactionary thought police of the Left? You've long known my views on Labour and the provenly dishonest but systematic devaluing/disregarding of white-British working class people by the very party that was supposed to stand their corner. We will always disagree so there's little point pretending otherwise. But please don't hint at something at something that is patently and demonstrably untrue. Cos I can state hand on heart that I have never voted for the odious BNP. But I don't think you can swear that you have never voted for the Labour Party I've described.
Finnegan Posted 26 October 2010 Posted 26 October 2010 Forever denying the truthfully undeniable...and throwing in snide innuendo that is demonstrably untrue to help deflect from the truth. Ah Tony. The good old "I'M RIGHT AND LITERALLY EVERYONE ELSE IS WRONG." Sheehan is world class, Dodds will make it, Porter the next big thing - the Labour Party, complete racists! At least you got Andy King right.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.