zubi Posted 6 May 2011 Posted 6 May 2011 Couldnt get to the end, winds me up. Some right do-gooders on here questioning wether it was right to kill Bin Laden. Wether torture is right or wrong etc. There is a line. He was the most evil **** on earth how could anyone possibly criticize anything that happened to him or the procedures, human rights etc. Open your ****ing eyes! Hope the bastard rots in hell. Innocents killed by Bin Laden in 9/11 + Nairobi attacks - 5,000-7,000? Innocents killed by George Bush invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan - 100,000 - 1,000,000?
Steven Posted 6 May 2011 Posted 6 May 2011 Innocents killed by Bin Laden in 9/11 + Nairobi attacks - 5,000-7,000? Innocents killed by George Bush invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan - 100,000 - 1,000,000? Quite.
iBleedLeicesterColours Posted 6 May 2011 Posted 6 May 2011 Innocents killed by Bin Laden in 9/11 + Nairobi attacks - 5,000-7,000? Innocents killed by George Bush invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan - 100,000 - 1,000,000? So after he Bin Laden killed those innocent people we should have just stood and watched him kill more instead of hunting him down ?
Steven Posted 6 May 2011 Posted 6 May 2011 So after George Bush killed those innocent people we should have just stood and watched him kill more instead of hunting him down ?
Finnegan Posted 6 May 2011 Posted 6 May 2011 So after he Bin Laden killed those innocent people we should have just stood and watched him kill more instead of hunting him down ? WHOOOOSH
Webbo Posted 6 May 2011 Posted 6 May 2011 Innocents killed by Bin Laden in 9/11 + Nairobi attacks - 5,000-7,000? So you're admitting now that Bin Laden's lot did do 9/11?
zubi Posted 6 May 2011 Posted 6 May 2011 So after George Bush killed those innocent people we should have just stood and watched him kill more instead of hunting him down ? quite
zubi Posted 6 May 2011 Posted 6 May 2011 So you're admitting now that Bin Laden's lot did do 9/11? <_< Well if I said the CIA instead of Bin Laden, about 50 people would just call me a truther, conspiracy theorist, nut, brain dead, etc... I was trying to prove a point
Zingari Posted 6 May 2011 Posted 6 May 2011 So you're admitting now that Bin Laden's lot did do 9/11? Yes probably , but Bin Laden was also a CIA Agent known as Tim Osman so either way it was probably "Bin Laden's lot" that was responsible
Trav Le Bleu Posted 6 May 2011 Posted 6 May 2011 Yes probably , but Bin Laden was also a CIA Agent known as Tim Osman so either way it was probably "Bin Laden's lot" that was responsible Are you saying Tim Osman is dead?! Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!
Zingari Posted 6 May 2011 Posted 6 May 2011 Are you saying Tim Osman is dead?! Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo! Yes his "osman" light bulbs are out for good edit; sorry it's osram that make light bulbs ain't it ?
MC Prussian Posted 6 May 2011 Posted 6 May 2011 Whether you believe in this stuff or not, it does make for an interesting listen.
zubi Posted 6 May 2011 Posted 6 May 2011 Surprised no one has put a video up from the legend himself RIP George
Austin Posted 6 May 2011 Posted 6 May 2011 Anagram of Osama Bin Laden ... Lob Da Man In Sea .. Interesting. Courtesy of Russell Howards good news.
Steven Posted 7 May 2011 Posted 7 May 2011 Anwar al-Awlaki the next Boogeyman The US-born radical Yemeni cleric Anwar al-Awlaki is head of al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. As if by magic and right on cue. Yemen al-Qaeda head Anwar al-Awlaki 'targeted by drone'
Zingari Posted 7 May 2011 Posted 7 May 2011 Anwar al-Awlaki ? that's a bit of a tongue twister mouthful , couldn't they pick on someone with an easier name ?
MPH Posted 7 May 2011 Posted 7 May 2011 Anwar al-Awlaki the next Boogeyman The US-born radical Yemeni cleric Anwar al-Awlaki is head of al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. As if by magic and right on cue. Yemen al-Qaeda head Anwar al-Awlaki 'targeted by drone' Anwar al-Awlaki ? that's a bit of a tongue twister mouthful , couldn't they pick on someone with an easier name ? He was probably born as ' Randy Smith' or something well easy like that..
BoneDog Posted 7 May 2011 Posted 7 May 2011 Some pretty ****ed up photos there! WTF is the helicopter all about? Check out picture 9/9. It was supposedly a big firefight and yet I can't see any casings anywhere. But I know why. The guy in picture 9's weapon is under his right shoulder. It's a frickin bright green water pistol!!!
BoneDog Posted 7 May 2011 Posted 7 May 2011 Why don't they just show the pictures? The Saddam hanging was live on the net at the time possibly tv. Also the Americans have come out saying there wasn't any live footage of the event? Few days ago they said there was...................................... Two good points and the second point means that this photo was a staged piece of propaganda. Love the way Hilary is covering her mouth in faux shock!
BoneDog Posted 7 May 2011 Posted 7 May 2011 I admit they keep changing the story, but releasing pictures will just add fuel to the fire. And I read in yesterdays metro that we aren't living in a caveman era, so Osama should have had a proper burial. Are these people ****ing deluded? Yeah, give the man a proper burial, he deserves one, killed a few thousand people and then give him a shrine so every other nutter in the world can go there and pay their respects. **** that, hes dead in the sea, hopefully hes been eaten by a shark, thats all he deserves, scum of the highest order. All we need now is more of his family and his allies to be killed. Most of his family are good friends with the powers that be in the USA so I don't think they'd ever try to kill them. They whisked them away back to Saudi out of the US on 9/11 while nobody else was allowed to fly. And they've been doing really big business with the Bin Laden family for decades, building roads and airports together. They're good chums. Don't you think that it's a little strange that a son/brother of a massive business partner of a few different US administrations just happens to be 'the most evil man in the world'? Sounds more like a movie to me.
BoneDog Posted 7 May 2011 Posted 7 May 2011 it seems far more believable than George Bush and his administration staging the entire event from start to finish. Especially when you consider what an inept regime it was as well. (back to 911) Not a bad arguement if you believe that Bush or any of the other spokesmen were really the masterminds of the US administration at the time. Or if you believe that any Presidnet / PM is the brains behind any government. But you seem to be forgetting about the men and women really in control. You know, those men and women who are always in the background no matter which administration is in charge. Kissinger and Brzezinski to name just a couple. There are many more that are in the background for decades and their control runs through many different administrations. These are the people with the real control and influence. Have you heard some of these peoples quotes about civilians and even their own soldiers? They do not give a crap about any of us who are outside of their elite world. And I would say that those kind of people would have no problem whatsoever with planning and committing a heinous act like that which happened on 9/11.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.