dayday Posted 15 July 2011 Posted 15 July 2011 Sky have gave there list of games up to Nov 5th....skysports.com/livefixtures.... After the first 14 games. Leeds united are on the box 5 times......with 4 of those fixtures being away. Forest ...................twice West Ham ............twice Southampton.......twice The rest once.....but not including Crystal Palace,Millwall and Bristol City who are not on at all. What happened to equal share?
MikeyT Posted 15 July 2011 Posted 15 July 2011 We get shown once. Cardiff v Leicester Championship: Sun 25th Sept, KO 1:15
LCFC_FAN_1995 Posted 15 July 2011 Posted 15 July 2011 I don't mind if we're not on sky because i go to all the games anyway
sdb Posted 15 July 2011 Posted 15 July 2011 I don't mind if we're not on sky because i go to all the games anyway You just care about everyone soooo much
ousefox Posted 15 July 2011 Posted 15 July 2011 You just care about everyone soooo much I get to as many games as possible, but would much rather the games were saturday 3pm's for the fans who go to every game, rather than suit people watching it on the tele tbh.
LCFC_FAN_1995 Posted 15 July 2011 Posted 15 July 2011 You just care about everyone soooo much Oh well guess people will have to deal with it that we are not on tv YET...there will be many changes...forest away will be friday night i bet
dayday Posted 15 July 2011 Author Posted 15 July 2011 I don't mind if we're not on sky because i go to all the games anyway I am a season ticket holder,but that is not the point i was wondering what Sky pay each club per game. The likes of Doncaster,Millwall and Crystal Palace will be a little cheesed off i would presume ,as there gates are not brilliant and would rely on Sky's money and yet they have no game at all.
Maybes Posted 15 July 2011 Posted 15 July 2011 I might be wrong but I'm sure all the TV money is shared out equally at the beginning of the season, so not be on the box is probably better = increased gates.
MikeyT Posted 15 July 2011 Posted 15 July 2011 I don't mind if we're not on sky because i go to all the games anyway Only thinking of yourself. You selfish shit!!!
LCFC_FAN_1995 Posted 15 July 2011 Posted 15 July 2011 Only thinking of yourself. You selfish shit!!! Well go to the games then
John Matrix Posted 15 July 2011 Posted 15 July 2011 would have thought we would be on more than that. were were on a lot back 3 seasons ago. what was it last season 4 times in the champ portsmouth, ipswich, derby, notts. it'll prbably change as the season progresses.
LCFC_FAN_1995 Posted 15 July 2011 Posted 15 July 2011 would have thought we would be on more than that. were were on a lot back 3 seasons ago. what was it last season 4 times in the champ portsmouth, ipswich, derby, notts. it'll prbably change as the season progresses. and Reading
MikeyT Posted 15 July 2011 Posted 15 July 2011 Well go to the games then Unfortunately bills and rent take preference over a football match.
Yojoe36 Posted 15 July 2011 Posted 15 July 2011 I don't mind if we're not on sky because i go to all the games anyway Well get you
Bugg Posted 15 July 2011 Posted 15 July 2011 I don't mind if we're not on sky because i go to all the games anyway Well, good for you, but not all of us can afford/have time to go to every game. So how about you pipe down trying to belittle someone for not being able to go to 46+ games per season.
Wymsey Posted 15 July 2011 Posted 15 July 2011 Want more than just one game on Sky, but on the other hand the commentary team (Beagrie etc) always stick up to the other team and praise their performances whenever we played an opposition on Sky coverage.
Brainy Posted 15 July 2011 Posted 15 July 2011 What happened to equal share? The season doesnt finish in November
dayday Posted 15 July 2011 Author Posted 15 July 2011 Want more than just one game on Sky, but on the other hand the commentary team (Beagrie etc) always stick up to the other team and praise their performances whenever we played an opposition on Sky coverage. Your right,Beagrie will have a field day next season with all the money we have spent.
I am Rod Hull Posted 15 July 2011 Posted 15 July 2011 I don't mind if we're not on sky because i go to all the games anyway Im sure as you get older, you will attend less games.. Unless you`re stupidly well off..
Stevosevic Posted 15 July 2011 Posted 15 July 2011 David Gold of West Ham said the other day, openly, that a club receives 60K for a live match in the championship, doesn't seem that beneficial.
cc_star Posted 15 July 2011 Posted 15 July 2011 Sky have gave there list of games up to Nov 5th....skysports.com/livefixtures.... After the first 14 games. Leeds united are on the box 5 times......with 4 of those fixtures being away. Forest ...................twice West Ham ............twice Southampton.......twice The rest once.....but not including Crystal Palace,Millwall and Bristol City who are not on at all. What happened to equal share? Because they have to rotate the clubs that means Leeds won't feature much at the business end of the season. We obviously will!
cc_star Posted 15 July 2011 Posted 15 July 2011 would have thought we would be on more than that. were were on a lot back 3 seasons ago. what was it last season 4 times in the champ portsmouth, ipswich, derby, notts. it'll prbably change as the season progresses. Reading & Cov I think as well
Corky Posted 15 July 2011 Posted 15 July 2011 I hope, when the games are moved, they are kept to Saturdays. Sundays wouldn't be too bad, but hopefully no Monday nights.
Larry_LCFC Posted 15 July 2011 Posted 15 July 2011 David Gold of West Ham said the other day, openly, that a club receives 60K for a live match in the championship, doesn't seem that beneficial. Getting £60,000 for allowing cameras to film a game that would be happening anyway isnt beneficial Dont think you would find a single club that would say no based on the fact that its not worth it.
Foxblogger Posted 15 July 2011 Posted 15 July 2011 Getting £60,000 for allowing cameras to film a game that would be happening anyway isnt beneficial Dont think you would find a single club that would say no based on the fact that its not worth it. I guess that needs to be balanced with the possibility of 2000+ (assuming £30 a ticket) fans deciding to stay at home and watch it on the TV.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.