Red Dawn Posted 3 August 2011 Posted 3 August 2011 Why do we keep getting posters who support other clubs on our forums? Granted some are decent but others are just trying to cause s**t... Ban em' all I say! Not trying to cause shit at all dude.
Guest Bilo Posted 3 August 2011 Posted 3 August 2011 Why do we keep getting posters who support other clubs on our forums? Granted some are decent but others are just trying to cause s**t... Ban em' all I say! Sledgehammer to crack a nut. The Reading lot have been reasonable, more than reasonable in fact under the circumstances, and we have several regular posters who support other clubs without whom this forum would be poorer. The Bristol City mouthbreathers are annoying, but we can just tell them to fuck off, which they probably will do if/when we sign Long instead of Maynard.
themotivator Posted 3 August 2011 Posted 3 August 2011 to be fair there are plenty of posters off here who go to other forums to get info or simply to wind people up. dont let yourself get all worked up lad
FallenAngel Posted 3 August 2011 Posted 3 August 2011 It's nice to have a different perspective on things i reckon, despite how annoying some of them may be
wellyfox Posted 3 August 2011 Posted 3 August 2011 The club would be allowed to make the revenue, there's no problem with that. What they would do is exclude that particular revenue (or the portion deemed to be above fair value) from the break-even calculation on which FFP is based. As i understand it and i may be wrong. If a contract is drawn up ie shirts 2m ground 10m training ground 1m a yr over 5 years over a period say 5 yrs then thats fine. But kp can't say nxt year oh here is 40m for the ground this year just cause they want to buy an extra 30m of players. anything thats contracted for whatever period is ok. It's further injections of cash that don't count. but am praps wrong :crylaugh:
Rusko187 Posted 3 August 2011 Posted 3 August 2011 Sledgehammer to crack a nut. The Reading lot have been reasonable, more than reasonable in fact under the circumstances, and we have several regular posters who support other clubs without whom this forum would be poorer. The Bristol City mouthbreathers are annoying, but we can just tell them to fuck off, which they probably will do if/when we sign Long instead of Maynard. Yeah apologies I was more referring to then bunch of tools tbh, just needed a quick rant but I call for wielding the ban hammer on the brizzle boys!
wellyfox Posted 3 August 2011 Posted 3 August 2011 Not trying to cause shit at all dude. Red from what i have seen your fine don't worry. ( now i'll get shot at) As for the wally he was out his depth with england. But you dont get respect from fergie if your shit. Boro to a euro final. Oh n what did in holland was akin to what clough did for you. And no i don.t rate him anywhere near clough. Honest i hate the tree's more than any other but respect where it's due Clough was a great. And MoN was shit hot as a FOX :scarf: :scarf:
DJ Barry Hammond Posted 3 August 2011 Posted 3 August 2011 100 pages anyone? Is a player allowed to sign for us if we haven't made a 100 page thread about them?
Itsthejoeker Posted 3 August 2011 Posted 3 August 2011 Is a player allowed to sign for us if we haven't made a 100 page thread about them? No, we're holding up the deal!
ian_marshall Posted 3 August 2011 Posted 3 August 2011 As i understand it and i may be wrong. If a contract is drawn up ie shirts 2m ground 10m training ground 1m a yr over 5 years over a period say 5 yrs then thats fine. But kp can't say nxt year oh here is 40m for the ground this year just cause they want to buy an extra 30m of players. anything thats contracted for whatever period is ok. It's further injections of cash that don't count. but am praps wrong :crylaugh: But there will always be new ways of bringing more revenue into the business whether it be by placing sponsored adverts in the match day programme, to painting King Power on the floor of the concourse for a fee, so long as the club have the contracts set up on differing timelines then they will be able to manage their revenue streams in line with the regulations as these contracts will constantly be up for renewal and open to higher offers every couple of years.
DJ Barry Hammond Posted 3 August 2011 Posted 3 August 2011 No, we're holding up the deal! I take it we also have to go completely off subject within those 100 pages and have squabbles with rival supporters?
Bob Weasel Fox Posted 3 August 2011 Posted 3 August 2011 is there actually any news on this at all, its becoming a long and drawn out affair
wellyfox Posted 3 August 2011 Posted 3 August 2011 But there will always be new ways of bringing more revenue into the business whether it be by placing sponsored adverts in the match day programme, to painting King Power on the floor of the concourse for a fee, so long as the club have the contracts set up on differing timelines then they will be able to manage their revenue streams in line with the regulations as these contracts will constantly be up for renewal and open to higher offers every couple of years. They can tattoo KP on my arse for a fee if it helps the club.
wellyfox Posted 3 August 2011 Posted 3 August 2011 They can tattoo KP on my arse for a fee if it helps the club. But they can fook right off at tattooing KP on my nut sack :crylaugh: :crylaugh: :crylaugh: :crylaugh:
Bob Weasel Fox Posted 3 August 2011 Posted 3 August 2011 But they can fook right off at tattooing KP on my nut sack :crylaugh: :crylaugh: :crylaugh: :crylaugh: youve gotta have balls to have that done
Itsthejoeker Posted 3 August 2011 Posted 3 August 2011 I take it we also have to go completely off subject within those 100 pages and have squabbles with rival supporters? Don't forget that arguments about racism!
Jon the Hat Posted 3 August 2011 Posted 3 August 2011 I take it we also have to go completely off subject within those 100 pages and have squabbles with rival supporters? I think you are being unreasonable. Are you? I think this requires discussion.
ian_marshall Posted 3 August 2011 Posted 3 August 2011 But they can fook right off at tattooing KP on my nut sack :crylaugh: :crylaugh: :crylaugh: :crylaugh: Come on, take one for the team! Just make sure Top coughs up the cash for Shane Long in return. Look at it this way, it's not like he's asking you to have the Forest badge tattooed on your ball bag,
Jon the Hat Posted 3 August 2011 Posted 3 August 2011 Don't forget that arguments about racism! I can't believe you brought up the fact that Shane is Irish. It's a disgrace you should be ashamed! Are you? If not please explain why immediately.
TheUltimateWinner Posted 3 August 2011 Posted 3 August 2011 Sven wants him. I dont though Plenty of better PROVEN options... Take away his penalties its only 14 goals last season
Jon the Hat Posted 3 August 2011 Posted 3 August 2011 Sven wants him. I dont though Plenty of better PROVEN options... Take away his penalties its only 14 goals last season Is that the attitude of a winner? NO! Charlie Sheen would laugh in your general direction.
Bob Weasel Fox Posted 3 August 2011 Posted 3 August 2011 Come on, take one for the team! Just make sure Top coughs up the cash for Shane Long in return. Look at it this way, it's not like he's asking you to have the Forest badge tattooed on your ball bag, interesting thought - i did once consider having a F****t toilet fitted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.