Daggers Posted 16 May 2012 Posted 16 May 2012 Round of applause for David, I perhaps wouldn't put everything as aggressively as he has at times but I can't find much of what he's said that I disagree with. You might want to push him on specifics rather than his weak generalisations because the stuff I see being quoted has more holes waiting to be filled than a house of ill-repute staffed by Eastern-European sex slaves.
Zingari Posted 17 May 2012 Author Posted 17 May 2012 You might want to push him on specifics rather than his weak generalisations because the stuff I see being quoted has more holes waiting to be filled than a house of ill-repute staffed by Eastern-European sex slaves. You accuse him of not being specific , but you don't actually say where this place is or how much it would cost !!
Daggers Posted 17 May 2012 Posted 17 May 2012 You accuse him of not being specific , but you don't actually say where this place is or how much it would cost !! Northampton, a range of fees starting at £30 for a fifteen minute quickie. Ask for Lyubov, Olga or Svetlana. It would take me that long to get undressed and get dressed again. Quite frankly, if they charged £30 for a cream tea I'd be much more interested.
AoWW Posted 17 May 2012 Posted 17 May 2012 Northampton, a range of fees starting at £30 for a fifteen minute quickie. Ask for Lyubov, Olga or Svetlana. It would take me that long to get undressed and get dressed again. Quite frankly, if they charged £30 for a cream tea I'd be much more interested. I'll do cream teas in my back garden for £30 if you're interested. You'd get to sit under a parasol and watch the squirrels and pheasants. All very civilised.
I am Rod Hull Posted 17 May 2012 Posted 17 May 2012 I'll do cream teas in my back garden for £30 if you're interested. You'd get to sit under a parasol and watch the squirrels and pheasants. All very civilised.
Daggers Posted 17 May 2012 Posted 17 May 2012 I'll do cream teas in my back garden for £30 if you're interested. You'd get to sit under a parasol and watch the squirrels and pheasants. All very civilised. Filth. Absolute filth.
Guest MattP Posted 17 May 2012 Posted 17 May 2012 Can't believe I've only just read this thread lol David
Parafox Posted 18 May 2012 Posted 18 May 2012 Dave, Is Ian the Neanderthal you're more intelligent relative?
Rincewind Posted 18 May 2012 Posted 18 May 2012 David To what level of the life intelligence ladder have I slipped for buying a Jeffery Archer book?
21st Century Fox Posted 18 May 2012 Posted 18 May 2012 David. Do you have a daughter I can marry? I believe she's still unmarried.
MooseBreath Posted 18 May 2012 Posted 18 May 2012 Just got off the phone with David. Sad news, I'm afraid. Earlier today, David replied to Parafox's earlier insulting post with a reply that was, at worst, similarly insulting (if mocking someone's inability to use the correct "YOUR" could ever be insulting, which it's not). It was an act of defiant self defence against someone whose needless, unprovoked attack is a clear violation of forum rules. What happened next was surely one of the most controversial moderating decisions in Foxestalk history. Not only was David's post deleted, he was also issued with a three-month ban. Interestingly, for provoking David with an aggresive, abusive post, Parafox himself received no ban. Amazingly, his post still remains, standing as clear proof to the fact that the moderator has applied their power in a woefully inconsistant manner, leading to some pundits suggesting corruption in the corriders of foxestalk HQ, while others have said that it's just plain poor moderating by a person with a personal vendetta against David. Needless to say, David will be quiet for a while, he does not want to risk further punishment for daring to speak out against this terrible regime. We'll all miss him, I'm sure. Signing off, Moosebreath x x x
Zingari Posted 18 May 2012 Author Posted 18 May 2012 Is that true ? It seems a bit harsh I like David
sphericalfox Posted 18 May 2012 Posted 18 May 2012 Just got off the phone with David. Sad news, I'm afraid. Earlier today, David replied to Parafox's earlier insulting post with a reply that was, at worst, similarly insulting (if mocking someone's inability to use the correct "YOUR" could ever be insulting, which it's not). It was an act of defiant self defence against someone whose needless, unprovoked attack is a clear violation of forum rules. What happened next was surely one of the most controversial moderating decisions in Foxestalk history. Not only was David's post deleted, he was also issued with a three-month ban. Interestingly, for provoking David with an aggresive, abusive post, Parafox himself received no ban. Amazingly, his post still remains, standing as clear proof to the fact that the moderator has applied their power in a woefully inconsistant manner, leading to some pundits suggesting corruption in the corriders of foxestalk HQ, while others have said that it's just plain poor moderating by a person with a personal vendetta against David. Needless to say, David will be quiet for a while, he does not want to risk further punishment for daring to speak out against this terrible regime. We'll all miss him, I'm sure. Signing off, Moosebreath x x x I don't know much about much, but I very much doubt it.
21st Century Fox Posted 18 May 2012 Posted 18 May 2012 I have a feeling his spirit will continue to be with us in the guise of MooseBreath.
The Doctor Posted 18 May 2012 Posted 18 May 2012 Just got off the phone with David. Sad news, I'm afraid. Earlier today, David replied to Parafox's earlier insulting post with a reply that was, at worst, similarly insulting (if mocking someone's inability to use the correct "YOUR" could ever be insulting, which it's not). It was an act of defiant self defence against someone whose needless, unprovoked attack is a clear violation of forum rules. What happened next was surely one of the most controversial moderating decisions in Foxestalk history. Not only was David's post deleted, he was also issued with a three-month ban. Interestingly, for provoking David with an aggresive, abusive post, Parafox himself received no ban. Amazingly, his post still remains, standing as clear proof to the fact that the moderator has applied their power in a woefully inconsistant manner, leading to some pundits suggesting corruption in the corriders of foxestalk HQ, while others have said that it's just plain poor moderating by a person with a personal vendetta against David. Needless to say, David will be quiet for a while, he does not want to risk further punishment for daring to speak out against this terrible regime. We'll all miss him, I'm sure. Signing off, Moosebreath x x x He's been banned? ****s sake, I updated my ignore list for nothing. Oh, and where would this parafox post be then?
Daggers Posted 18 May 2012 Posted 18 May 2012 Dear David, Is it true that now you've been banned you are going to be standing in Morrisons' baby food aisle, smearing rhubarb jam on your cock, in order to get the attention you will now be missing?
Zingari Posted 18 May 2012 Author Posted 18 May 2012 Come on people , surely he ain't done enough to be banned has he ? i think i saw the post and yes, it was a bit abusive , but no more than posts i see nearly every day ! David may not be a poster most of us agree with , but flippin heck, he's not some monster to be exorcised is he ?
Rincewind Posted 18 May 2012 Posted 18 May 2012 Is he really banned? Not read many of the posts only some of the ones in this thread so what did he post that was so bad? I've seen a lot of controversial posts by others so unless they were libel or against the law I thought most things were tolerated on here.
Daggers Posted 18 May 2012 Posted 18 May 2012 I thought most things were tolerated on here. Only child sex and animal rape - pictures of kittens playing with balls of wool is right out.
Guest MattP Posted 19 May 2012 Posted 19 May 2012 If he's really been banned it's a bit of a joke to be honest, I've seen nothing from him to warrant that. General Chat sections are fantastic places on forums, don't kill them off by banning the entertaining/controversial figures.
Captain... Posted 19 May 2012 Posted 19 May 2012 I quite like David the Caveman, even if we do look at the world in very different ways, shame if he has been banned, I will have to find another offensive right-wing reactionary to spar with. Can someone PM what he said, it has obviously been deleted now.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.