Jon the Hat Posted 3 August 2012 Posted 3 August 2012 Whose alumni have provided half our olympic medals, and a world class rowing venue at Eton. Hopefully this Olympics can bring a newfound interest in funding school sports to a decent level in all schools.
21st Century Fox Posted 3 August 2012 Posted 3 August 2012 Wasn't the stat, 50% of the golds from Bejing were won by private school attendees, which equates to a representation of 7% of the population. Shameful statistic for our country. Luckily Michael Gove won't be making any further cuts to school sports programmes..... no wait.
Nick Posted 3 August 2012 Posted 3 August 2012 Yes its bloody marvellous to watch all the privileged people do well for a change.
Bert Posted 3 August 2012 Posted 3 August 2012 I fucking hate parents that can't afford to put their children through a private school. Inconsiderate or what.
Trav Le Bleu Posted 3 August 2012 Posted 3 August 2012 Shock - those from privileged backgrounds have more chance of success!
21st Century Fox Posted 3 August 2012 Posted 3 August 2012 I much prefer to see royals handing other royals medals personally.
MooseBreath Posted 3 August 2012 Posted 3 August 2012 Success breeds success, literally. You should have posted this in general chat, the lefties would have been orgasming uncontrollably at the opportunity to lay some blame.
Nick Posted 3 August 2012 Posted 3 August 2012 Success breeds success, literally. You should have posted this in general chat, the lefties would have been orgasming uncontrollably at the opportunity to lay some blame. Why? Can't the 'Lefties' get in here?
MooseBreath Posted 3 August 2012 Posted 3 August 2012 Why? Can't the 'Lefties' get in here? They can, and they will, but they'll come in as a slow drip rather than all exploding in anger at once, which would have been funnier.
Trav Le Bleu Posted 3 August 2012 Posted 3 August 2012 Success breeds success, literally. You should have posted this in general chat, the lefties would have been orgasming uncontrollably at the opportunity to lay some blame. Bollocks. It's not purely genetic, it's about being given the chance. There must be thousands of public school (no wait, that's private schools... I've never understood this) STATE SCHOOLED people who are more suited to events such as fencing, rowing, equestrianism. I'm sure their are plenty of kids from Tottenham and Lewisham who would excel at the shooting events!
21st Century Fox Posted 3 August 2012 Posted 3 August 2012 Even a Tory agrees.... http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-19109724
Finnegan Posted 3 August 2012 Posted 3 August 2012 Success breeds success, literally. You should have posted this in general chat, the lefties would have been orgasming uncontrollably at the opportunity to lay some blame. Uhmmm. Now you've got to be trolling. You're honestly suggesting that the upper classes are biologically superior? If success "literally" breeds success we should be forcing Wayne Rooney to knock up Sophie Bradley, not grooming the sons and daughters of successful academics for future track stars.
purpleronnie Posted 3 August 2012 Posted 3 August 2012 Not surprising when you read how many playing fields have been built on, or that schools ban sports days etc...It needs to start in schools so if sports in schools is almost non existant how can we progress. Compare that to yankyland where sports dominate school life and theres little hope really. Keep piling money into cycling, rowing and we should always do ok...because the chances of dominating other sports is non existant.
Guest Bilo Posted 3 August 2012 Posted 3 August 2012 Success breeds success, literally. You should have posted this in general chat, the lefties would have been orgasming uncontrollably at the opportunity to lay some blame. I thought Cyril Burt was dead.
Out Foxed Posted 3 August 2012 Posted 3 August 2012 Uhmmm. Now you've got to be trolling. You're honestly suggesting that the upper classes are biologically superior? you do realise a lot of public school pupils aren't from the "upper classes". There are people whose working class parents did well for themselves and then chose to send them to private school.
MooseBreath Posted 3 August 2012 Posted 3 August 2012 Uhmmm. Now you've got to be trolling. You're honestly suggesting that the upper classes are biologically superior? You don't believe in hereditary traits? Not sure who is trolling here tbh. Anyway, ignore my earlier comment, clearly access to better training and more comprehensive facilities is the main cause. I was hoping all the lefties would start complaining about how unfair it is that wealthy people are allowed to spend their money on a better standard of education, and how you all believe that every child should have access to a canoe and that it doesn't matter how much it will costs because the money will presumably just appear... And all the usual utter bollocks you lefties spout
MooseBreath Posted 3 August 2012 Posted 3 August 2012 Yeah, that would have been funny, really funny. Ha. Go hug a tree you joyless baffoon
Nick Posted 3 August 2012 Posted 3 August 2012 Go hug a tree you joyless baffoon Bring it, internet warrior
Zingari Posted 3 August 2012 Posted 3 August 2012 Is it relevant that most of the medals won by those from public schools are done so while sitting on their arses ?
Captain... Posted 3 August 2012 Posted 3 August 2012 you do realise a lot of public school pupils aren't from the "upper classes". There are people whose working class parents did well for themselves and then chose to send them to private school. We need to get this straight, public schools are, in theory, open to anyone from the public, with the money to send their kids there*, private schools generally admit people on the back of academic achievements, and are also not free, but scholarships can be attained for some of the best and brightest. State schools are completely state funded. Private and public schools are both privately funded and so can probably afford better equipment and facilities, state funded schools are, funded by the state and so have limited resources to spend on sporting facilities so it is not surprising that more top class athletes from sports requiring specialist equipment come from privately funded schools. *basically it allows thick kids with money to avoid mixing with the riff raff.
Jon the Hat Posted 3 August 2012 Author Posted 3 August 2012 We need to get this straight, public schools are, in theory, open to anyone from the public, with the money to send their kids there*, private schools generally admit people on the back of academic achievements, and are also not free, but scholarships can be attained for some of the best and brightest. State schools are completely state funded. Private and public schools are both privately funded and so can probably afford better equipment and facilities, state funded schools are, funded by the state and so have limited resources to spend on sporting facilities so it is not surprising that more top class athletes from sports requiring specialist equipment come from privately funded schools. *basically it allows thick kids with money to avoid mixing with the riff raff. It certainly isn't a surprise, and it has nothing whatsoever to do with innate talent, and everything to do with standards of facilities, competition, parental involvement and encouragement. It is a shame with all this lottery funding going into sport we cannot make it more accessible to Schools. All elite facilities should be available to schools by default for some of the time. While this might mean less cash to medals in the short term who knows what talent we might find.
acooling08 Posted 3 August 2012 Posted 3 August 2012 It's not surprising really that the rich and privately educated are getting the majority of our medals. Of course they have more oppurtunity to take up sport, but they are also much more likely to be interested. The upper class are generally more intelligent and motivated (hence their wealth). Don't attack me here lefties, it's true. And I'm saying that as a middle class lad who went to your standard public college. How many public school pupils would be interested in rowing or velodrome cycling? A few but not many. The vast majority would only want to play football or not bother with Sport at all.
Guest MattP Posted 3 August 2012 Posted 3 August 2012 Not surprised. Private schooling is probably the only area of society where the bar hasn't been lowered over the last ten years.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.