Ely fox Posted 20 May 2013 Posted 20 May 2013 Look lets be clear nothing and I mean nothing is Pearson's fault he should have been the next United manager, so we are lucky to have him, irreplaceable.
artursteppe Posted 20 May 2013 Author Posted 20 May 2013 Ha Ha Ha Ha... so there is nothing a manager could do about the performances.... OK so what is the point of a manager.... I tell you what, I will do it then for half of NP money... this must rank as one of the worst opening lines of any post eve
artursteppe Posted 20 May 2013 Author Posted 20 May 2013 Looking on the bright side, we only managed an average of 0.75 points per game in the last 16 matches. It would have been a real nightmare had it been over 46 matches - 35 points for the season! ( Bristol City got 41 ). Ain't we the lucky ones, can't believe how lucky we are to have Pearson.
Ely fox Posted 20 May 2013 Posted 20 May 2013 Looking on the bright side, we only managed an average of 0.75 points per game in the last 16 matches. It would have been a real nightmare had it been over 46 matches - 35 points for the season! ( Bristol City got 41 ). Ain't we the lucky ones, can't believe how lucky we are to have Pearson. As I was saying we have one of the best tactically impressive managers in the division with a penchant for the hoof ball.
indierich06 Posted 20 May 2013 Posted 20 May 2013 Looking on the bright side, we only managed an average of 0.75 points per game in the last 16 matches. It would have been a real nightmare had it been over 46 matches - 35 points for the season! ( Bristol City got 41 ). Ain't we the lucky ones, can't believe how lucky we are to have Pearson.
Ely fox Posted 20 May 2013 Posted 20 May 2013 Its also not Nigel's fault that Leicester had the biggest budget in the championship. Spent on the likes of Danny Drinkwater who is about as useful as a wag in a pig farm.
indierich06 Posted 20 May 2013 Posted 20 May 2013 Its also not Nigel's fault that Leicester had the biggest budget in the championship. Spent on the likes of Danny Drinkwater who is about as useful as a wag in a pig farm. Yeah, alright then mate. Must have just dreamt Hull, Cardiff & Blackburn completely outspending us.
Bob Weasel Fox Posted 20 May 2013 Posted 20 May 2013 Look, let's be clear, there was nothing Nigel could do about our performances since January. We got 12 points from a possible 48 in our last 16 matches. 24 points would have secured automatic promotion. I say to all those Pearson haters, it could have been worse, we might have got none. He doesn't play for the team, he only picks it and chooses the formation and prepares the team with tactical excellence to play the next match. Just because the only time he got his tactics right was against Watford at home in the first play-off match, all season, what do people expect when he only gets paid a reported £500,000.00 per year, which is much less than most of the players. We also had a lot of bad luck, for example the wind blew too hard sometimes in the wrong direction in some matches, sometimes teams would play with 5 men in midfield against our 4, very unfair. Sometimes they would even play with 5 men at the back, or even shoot from outside the box when our players weren't ready. Pitches were sometimes too hard, sometimes too soft. Sometimes opposition players would shout 'BOO' to frighten our players and get an advantage that way. Some teams had bigger, stronger players than us with more skill, who played in effective formations with a tactical plan and an alternative plan if the first one was not working well enough. What on earth could Nigel have done about that? It is time people stopped picking on Nigel as though any of it is his fault. What we really need is stability when all is said and done, not promotion FFS! A bit cynical but made me laugh all the same
mrmagoomc4 Posted 20 May 2013 Posted 20 May 2013 my main problem with pearson is he never knew his first 11 for most of the season !!!! , next season will be interesting to see if he can get a better squad of players together to challenge for promotion .
shasse Posted 20 May 2013 Posted 20 May 2013 "Dude, it is a joke, like Pearson, OK?" Artursteppe ..... Yes matey, I got it, hence the go out with supervision stuff :} Thought it was quite good; loved the wind blowing...
DANGEROUS TIGER Posted 20 May 2013 Posted 20 May 2013 Look, let's be clear, there was nothing Nigel could do about our performances since January. We got 12 points from a possible 48 in our last 16 matches. 24 points would have secured automatic promotion. I say to all those Pearson haters, it could have been worse, we might have got none. He doesn't play for the team, he only picks it and chooses the formation and prepares the team with tactical excellence to play the next match. Just because the only time he got his tactics right was against Watford at home in the first play-off match, all season, what do people expect when he only gets paid a reported £500,000.00 per year, which is much less than most of the players. We also had a lot of bad luck, for example the wind blew too hard sometimes in the wrong direction in some matches, sometimes teams would play with 5 men in midfield against our 4, very unfair. Sometimes they would even play with 5 men at the back, or even shoot from outside the box when our players weren't ready. Pitches were sometimes too hard, sometimes too soft. Sometimes opposition players would shout 'BOO' to frighten our players and get an advantage that way. Some teams had bigger, stronger players than us with more skill, who played in effective formations with a tactical plan and an alternative plan if the first one was not working well enough. What on earth could Nigel have done about that? It is time people stopped picking on Nigel as though any of it is his fault. What we really need is stability when all is said and done, not promotion FFS! What a heap of unadulterated garbage! Just why do we have a manager in the first place? It's his job to run the business successfully, and not bloody sink it, you ignorant git. Some mother's do have them!
flowwolf Posted 20 May 2013 Posted 20 May 2013 I'm not using the word 'morons' to describe people whose opinion differs to mine, I'm using it to describe people who are - in my opinion - complete and utter morons. Funny enough there are a quite a few on here who find your posts moronic. ( people in glass houses anyone ? )
dynamark Posted 20 May 2013 Posted 20 May 2013 i feel like john macenroe.Good opening post with a hint of ironical truthfullness
Webbo Posted 20 May 2013 Posted 20 May 2013 What a heap of unadulterated garbage! Just why do we have a manager in the first place? It's his job to run the business successfully, and not bloody sink it, you ignorant git. Some mother's do have them! Whooosh
indierich06 Posted 20 May 2013 Posted 20 May 2013 Funny enough there are a quite a few on here who find your posts moronic. ( people in glass houses anyone ? ) Yeah, that's because they're morons.
RumbleFox Posted 20 May 2013 Posted 20 May 2013 Hey leave this guy alone, he is clearly a comic genius and an astute tactition. Can I learn from you oh wise one? Please, teach me the ways of your Wildesque wit!!
flowwolf Posted 20 May 2013 Posted 20 May 2013 Yeah, that's because they're morons. Yeah and my dads bigger than yours.
Strokes Posted 20 May 2013 Posted 20 May 2013 To be fair I found it very obvious.Amazing, some people have no sense of humour.
dmayne7 Posted 21 May 2013 Posted 21 May 2013 Did people actually find it funny? Was too over-the-top for my high brow humour
tomtom Posted 21 May 2013 Posted 21 May 2013 Funny enough there are a quite a few on here who find your posts moronic. ( people in glass houses anyone ? ) Coming from you? Oh the irony
Strokes Posted 21 May 2013 Posted 21 May 2013 Did people actually find it funny? Was too over-the-top for my high brow humour I more found the reaction funny, people united in stupidity.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.