Fox92 Posted 21 June 2013 Posted 21 June 2013 Well that's certainly brightened up my morning! Fcuking stroll on. Always pleased I can brighten up someone's morning. Don't really appreciate 'fcuking stroll on' though, generally just because it's something you don't agree with whether what I said was correct or incorrect. Have you actually re-read some of the stuff you post?
hackneyfox Posted 21 June 2013 Posted 21 June 2013 Michael Morrisson Really? Read what kitchandpro said about him and then add the opening game under Sousa to that. Muppets
Babylon Posted 21 June 2013 Posted 21 June 2013 Michael Morrisson Really? Read what kitchandpro said about him and then add the opening game under Sousa to that. Muppets Morrison was ok here, has done well at Charlton... but to suggest he is / was better than Hobbs are the words of a mad man.
Bettsj2 Posted 21 June 2013 Posted 21 June 2013 Either people dont want to accept how good we actually were during the first Hobbs/Pearson spell or they genuinly dont remember. The fact is that Hobbs was excellent for us under Pearson but the entire team fell apart under Sousa (with the exception of King) and Sven made it absolutely clear from the start that he didnt rate Hobbs and sold him at the first opportunity. Hobbs went on to be one of Hulls most solid defenders during his time there and it seems their fans would be sad to see him go. What Hobbs provided us under Pearson was reliability. When he played, you new he would hold position, wouldnt get dominated and would communicate really well with his defence and goalkeeper. We missed this so much last year and i'd be very pleased to see he and Wes line up alongside each other next year.
ealingfox Posted 21 June 2013 Posted 21 June 2013 Why is this thread still open? Based on nothing, pure conjecture. Unless Hobbsy puts in a transfer request and goes on the Hull equivalent of EMT wearing a Leicester shirt he's not coming back without Schmeics going the other way. And for all those debating the matter, the answer is Morgan > Hobbs > Vitor > Whitbread > Keane > Morrison > St. Ledger.
ThurnbyLodgeFox Posted 21 June 2013 Posted 21 June 2013 Why is this thread still open? Based on nothing, pure conjecture. Unless Hobbsy puts in a transfer request and goes on the Hull equivalent of EMT wearing a Leicester shirt he's not coming back without Schmeics going the other way. And for all those debating the matter, the answer is Morgan > Hobbs > Vitor > Whitbread > Keane > Morrison > St. Ledger. bit harsh, Shitbread is awful
ealingfox Posted 21 June 2013 Posted 21 June 2013 bit harsh, Shitbread is awful No, he isn't. Might be worth adding he's the only one of the lot who has played in the PL.
ThurnbyLodgeFox Posted 21 June 2013 Posted 21 June 2013 No, he isn't. Might be worth adding he's the only one of the lot who has played in the PL. and there is a reason he isn't anymore
ealingfox Posted 21 June 2013 Posted 21 June 2013 and there is a reason he isn't anymore Just as there's a reason none of the others, bar Keane, have at all.
ThurnbyLodgeFox Posted 21 June 2013 Posted 21 June 2013 Just as there's a reason none of the others, bar Keane, have at all. yet you say Morgan is better? I think we should agree to disagree
ealingfox Posted 21 June 2013 Posted 21 June 2013 yet you say Morgan is better? I think we should agree to disagree Better for us, yes. Morgan deserves a chance in the PL and hasn't got it yet. Whitbread had a difficult season which is why I can't put him higher yet, but with a pre-season and a chance at being first-choice for a bit I've no doubt he can significantly improve on last season. He doesn't warrant the 'Shitbread' tag, and he's not awful.
ThurnbyLodgeFox Posted 21 June 2013 Posted 21 June 2013 Better for us, yes. Morgan deserves a chance in the PL and hasn't got it yet. Whitbread had a difficult season which is why I can't put him higher yet, but with a pre-season and a chance at being first-choice for a bit I've no doubt he can significantly improve on last season. He doesn't warrant the 'Shitbread' tag, and he's not awful. but if we are serious about promotion, we have to do better ie Jack Hobbs
svensson Posted 21 June 2013 Posted 21 June 2013 but if we are serious about promotion, we have to do better ie Jack Hobbs How is he better?
Fox92 Posted 21 June 2013 Posted 21 June 2013 How is he better? We need a centre half. A solid one, which Hobbs has proved to be at this level here and at Hull. He is way better than Whitbread.
Number 6 Posted 21 June 2013 Posted 21 June 2013 Think a Hobbs Morgan partnership would be great. Shame this is all just conjecture.
Danno Posted 21 June 2013 Posted 21 June 2013 St Ledger is quite technically gifted, to be fair, always has been. Look at the cross he put in for Mills' goal at Southampton. edit: This doesn't make him a better player than Hobbs though, I don't believe he is. Hobbs is an old fashioned defender, like Morgan, and like Pearson was. A cross makes him technically gifted? lol lol
Heart-Shaped Fox Posted 21 June 2013 Posted 21 June 2013 Hobbs was very good here, suffered under Sven and like a few under Sven was sold for less than what we should reaslly have got. Wouldnt mind him back but ahrdly desperate for his return either.
svensson Posted 21 June 2013 Posted 21 June 2013 We need a centre half. A solid one, which Hobbs has proved to be at this level here and at Hull. He is way better than Whitbread. Based on an injury prone season for Whitbread? Or did you follow him throughout his time at Norwich?
hackneyfox Posted 21 June 2013 Posted 21 June 2013 Why is this thread still open? Based on nothing, pure conjecture. Unless Hobbsy puts in a transfer request and goes on the Hull equivalent of EMT wearing a Leicester shirt he's not coming back without Schmeics going the other way. And for all those debating the matter, the answer is Morgan > Hobbs > Vitor > Whitbread > Keane > Morrison > St. Ledger. Sorry but Morrisson is bottom of any list of CBs
MPH Posted 21 June 2013 Posted 21 June 2013 If I was given a choice between Hobbs, SSL, Whitbread and Moore to be a starting CB it would be Hobbs. But I wont be getting my knickers in a twist if it ends up being one of the others as I feel there are more important positions to be dealing with this close season...
AnotherShitSeason Posted 21 June 2013 Posted 21 June 2013 Always pleased I can brighten up someone's morning. Don't really appreciate 'fcuking stroll on' though, generally just because it's something you don't agree with whether what I said was correct or incorrect. Have you actually re-read some of the stuff you post? I never look backwards. Only forwards.
Neil_LCFC Posted 21 June 2013 Posted 21 June 2013 Selling Hobbs for less than 1mill and replacing him with matt Mills for 5mill , and over double the wages is probably as bad a piece of transfer business as I can ever remember in the clubs history. There really is no defending Sven when it comes to this, it was a total waste of money.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.