Kitchandro Posted 18 July 2013 Posted 18 July 2013 You are without doubt.. the perfect example as to why heterosexuals shouldnt be allowed to mate. You piss weak , fat little gobshite...Make no mistake, if your internet persona was even close to real, someone like me will fvck you up soon. Say what?! So we shouldn't eat meat and we shouldn't mate. Terrific.
Finnegan Posted 18 July 2013 Posted 18 July 2013 You are without doubt.. the perfect example as to why heterosexuals shouldnt be allowed to mate. You piss weak , fat little gobshite...Make no mistake, if your internet persona was even close to real, someone like me will fvck you up soon. lol !! Implied offering out over the internet. Made my day.
RedHux Posted 18 July 2013 Posted 18 July 2013 Fwiw myself and Mrs Hux both work in schools and in both our schools we have children with 'two mums' so to speak, through adoption. There is precisely no bullying because of this in either case.
Rincewind Posted 18 July 2013 Posted 18 July 2013 I think children up for adoption are more likely to go to parents that understand about bullying and are able to educate the children on how to cope. They would not place a child with a homophobic or racist couple and they would have to have some intellegence. So on the rare occasion that a same sex couple are accepted they would have met all the other criteria so would be well matched
Guest MattP Posted 18 July 2013 Posted 18 July 2013 Fwiw myself and Mrs Hux both work in schools and in both our schools we have children with 'two mums' so to speak, through adoption. There is precisely no bullying because of this in either case. Well of course. How do you think lads work?!!! Two Milfs = hot. Coolest kid in the class, not a lad in the school who doesn't want to go round. Two Dads = outcast. No one inviting him anywhere, ripe for inbetweener style "dads a bumder" jokes all day every day. Some people live in a fantasy world.
RedHux Posted 18 July 2013 Posted 18 July 2013 I can assure you there's nothing milf like about any of these parents. On the whole most of the kids couldn't give a monkeys about another kids domestic situation.
Guest MattP Posted 18 July 2013 Posted 18 July 2013 I can assure you there's nothing milf like about any of these parents. Homophobe.
Guest MattP Posted 18 July 2013 Posted 18 July 2013 Can you imagine how bitchy gay divorce will get? Can you how brusing and bloody a lesbo one would?
I am Rod Hull Posted 18 July 2013 Posted 18 July 2013 You are without doubt.. the perfect example as to why heterosexuals shouldnt be allowed to mate. You piss weak , fat little gobshite...Make no mistake, if your internet persona was even close to real, someone like me will fvck you up soon. Epic
I am Rod Hull Posted 18 July 2013 Posted 18 July 2013 I blame Channel 4 and Ben Elton for all of this....
Rincewind Posted 18 July 2013 Posted 18 July 2013 I blame Channel 4 and Ben Elton for all of this.... seems fair.
theessexfox Posted 18 July 2013 Posted 18 July 2013 It's not adding to their problems. It's better for a kid to be adopted by a gay couple then not adopted at all. Why is it just to satisfy a handful of adults? It's kids who will benefit because, y'know, more might actually get adopted, and thats a good thing. I think most people have agreed that straight couples should probably get priority on adopting kids, but if you honestly think that a kid will have more emotional problems being adopted by a gay couple than not being adopted at all, then you're either trolling, severely misguided, or you actually are homophobic. You've still not really clarified on these so-called problems that Kids will experience in schools. To be honest, I think you're talking bollocks there. As I said before, homophobia is already falling, and I'm sure the next generation will care even less. Unless you're arguing that bullying kids about gay parents is not homophobia, simply a misguided attempt to pick on people for being 'different', then in which case it's an even worse argument. I didn't see the people with single-parent familys get bullied, or the only black kid in the school get bullied for being black. Primary school kids are generally a lot more understanding/accepting than most people, and by secondary they should be old enough to know that is is homophobia. Unpopular kids will get bullied, it happens sometimes. They're bullied because they're seen as weak/an easy target, or they're bullied because they're unpopular. What they're bullied about doesn't tend to matter though - that's not the reason for them being bullied, that's just the tools for them to do it with. You can take away these tools, but they'll just find new ones. If it wasn't about having gay parents, it would be about something else - having glasses, being small, etc. On the other side, if you had a popular kid with gay parents, I doubt he'd get bullied about it at all. Kids wont be bullied because they have gay parents, they'll be bullied because they're unpopular and it's an easier angle for misguided and ignorant kids to poke fun at them. So to say "Gay Parents cant adopt because they'll get bullied in school" is a really silly statement. But hey - if you're happy to add to a child's potential problems in life, by refusing him adoption, simply to satisfy the homophobic agenda of a handful of adults, then fine. Please read the thread, he has agreed that gay adoption is preferable to no adoption. You are without doubt.. the perfect example as to why heterosexuals shouldnt be allowed to mate. You piss weak , fat little gobshite...Make no mistake, if your internet persona was even close to real, someone like me will fvck you up soon. Extinction here we come
Guest MattP Posted 18 July 2013 Posted 18 July 2013 Please read the thread, he has agreed that gay adoption is preferable to no adoption. People read what they want mate, always will. I made it very clear I supported gay marriage as it was two consenting adults and said gay adoption was better than none, you get accused of being against both by the end of a thread like this on here.
theessexfox Posted 18 July 2013 Posted 18 July 2013 People read what they want mate, always will. I made it very clear I supported gay marriage as it was two consenting adults and said gay adoption was better than none, you get accused of being against both by the end of a thread like this on here. So much fear of being a homophobe, that normal opinions are considered homophobic nowadays. I've nothing against gays - let them marry, let them adopt if there is no alternative.
The Doctor Posted 18 July 2013 Posted 18 July 2013 Irrelevant, I've stated they are both perfect and I wanted you to make the choice. We'll have to agree to disagree but I think it's a really fcuked up thing to do to a kid in the situation I've described. I doubt it, A gay man can't really explain to his daughter how his first period felt as far as I'm aware. Throw away sex/upbringing/genitalia if you want but it's a big part of a childs upbringing, ten times more so for a girl. You wouldn't call a Giraffe to bring up a Hippo. I would, could be hilarious.
Guest MattP Posted 18 July 2013 Posted 18 July 2013 So much fear of being a homophobe, that normal opinions are considered homophobic nowadays. I've nothing against gays - let them marry, let them adopt if there is no alternative. Get used to it, slander is the best weapon in British politics now for bringing about policy/law change, fair play to Cameron for spotting it on gay marriage and getting in before Labour. I would, could be hilarious. I'd watch.
DANGEROUS TIGER Posted 18 July 2013 Posted 18 July 2013 God help us, this country HAS gone to the dogs. Are cannibals allowed to bring up children? Sorry, Trav, don't know how your post got on here. I was responding to the thread title. Too much sun.
Guest MattP Posted 18 July 2013 Posted 18 July 2013 Are cannibals allowed to bring up children? Better than dumping them.
Trav Le Bleu Posted 18 July 2013 Posted 18 July 2013 On a serious point, I don't see why gay couples feel the need to get married - at the end of the day it's just the name for a certain type of relationship. I also don't see why gay people want to affiliate themselves to religions that don't allow homosexuality - isn't that like saying you want to be a vegetarian so long as you can eat lamb, beef, pork and chicken? Or being a Jewish Nazi. Also, if gay marriage is now legal, where do people in civil partnerships stand? Do they get a free upgrade?
Guest MattP Posted 18 July 2013 Posted 18 July 2013 Also, if gay marriage is now legal, where do people in civil partnerships stand? Do they get a free upgrade? Nope, illegal. We have now entered the farcical situation where more marriage options are avaliable to gay people than straight ones. Britain 2013. Big clap everyone.
Rincewind Posted 18 July 2013 Posted 18 July 2013 True. In 1817 only landowners were allowed to vote. Now they allow women to. How times have changed. :
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.