cityfanlee23 Posted 1 September 2013 Share Posted 1 September 2013 Why the hell have we even got him on the books if he wont get a chance... Really cannot understand the logic and why we would pay him for the sake of having him on the books if he rarely even makes the bench.. 9 apps since 2012? We talk about good/Bad business, this is fvcking rediculous business if you ask me... I still think we could give him a run in the team since wood has been off form for 6 months (Don't give me all that shit about his hattrick - He's been found out atm) Will be calling pearson in the morning to let him know im happy to sit in the reserves on half of futacs' wages.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corky Posted 1 September 2013 Share Posted 1 September 2013 Futacs is crap, don't know why we signed him and still employ him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Posted 1 September 2013 Share Posted 1 September 2013 Have you seen him play? He's awful. That's why he's not playing, that's why we can't shift him, and that's why we're stuck with him whether we like it or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyFox Posted 1 September 2013 Share Posted 1 September 2013 I think we should get rid of him, no point having him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cityfanlee23 Posted 1 September 2013 Author Share Posted 1 September 2013 Have you seen him play? He's awful. That's why he's not playing, that's why we can't shift him, and that's why we're stuck with him whether we like it or not. Listen I agree... to an extent... That opinion is somewhat correct, but its based on 9 appearances.. how many were subs? 4/5 I think... Scored a couple.. How many chances did we give vardy last season? Now look at him.. Im not saying he deserves his spot.. but maybe, just maybe.. he could turn out okay? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leicesterisme Posted 1 September 2013 Share Posted 1 September 2013 He is absolutely woeful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vardinhio Posted 1 September 2013 Share Posted 1 September 2013 he is so bad his name should be Marko Rubbish, bahahahahaha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dayday Posted 1 September 2013 Share Posted 1 September 2013 MARKO FUTACS.,,,,he is that shit he does not warrant capital letters Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cityfanlee23 Posted 1 September 2013 Author Share Posted 1 September 2013 He is absolutely woeful. So was vardy at the start.... You are basing "Woeful" on 9 appearances including 5 sub appearances... So wood last year must have been disgracing the club when he had his poor run... Good job leicester fans are not judges, they would be hung before the accused had finished the oath.. MARKO FUTACS.,,,,he is that shit he does not warrant capital letters Again.... Based on 9 appearances... 5 sub apps.. Did you say this about vardy? Or wood on his bad run? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corky Posted 1 September 2013 Share Posted 1 September 2013 So was vardy at the start.... You are basing "Woeful" on 9 appearances including 5 sub appearances... So wood last year must have been disgracing the club when he had his poor run... Good job leicester fans are not judges, they would be hung before the accused had finished the oath.. Again.... Based on 9 appearances... 5 sub apps.. Did you say this about vardy? Or wood on his bad run? Vardy, in his first few games, showed a willingness to get involved and linked up the play very neatly. He also scored four goals in his first six weeks with us. Futacs, from what I've seen, is slow, doesn't jump, is poor in the air and half decent on the ground. We signed Futacs on the back of a match against Portsmouth where he did ok, he's a poor man's Steve Howard and is not worth playing or keeping. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dayday Posted 1 September 2013 Share Posted 1 September 2013 City fan lee 8years old ,come on what have you seen we ain't? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cityfanlee23 Posted 1 September 2013 Author Share Posted 1 September 2013 Vardy, in his first few games, showed a willingness to get involved and linked up the play very neatly. He also scored four goals in his first six weeks with us. Futacs, from what I've seen, is slow, doesn't jump, is poor in the air and half decent on the ground. We signed Futacs on the back of a match against Portsmouth where he did ok, he's a poor man's Steve Howard and is not worth playing or keeping. Wood - Poor in the air most of the time, Shite on the ball.... Scored 9 in 9... then none in about 20! But because of the promise he showed, we showed faith... Because marko didnt show that initial promise we write him off like he's not got a hope of being a good player?? Give the lad a chance, no wonder players who play for leicester are not hyped up for us and give up within 6 months.. the turnaround for this club signings/departures is rediculous, if a striker doesnt score 30 in his first 15 games we write him off..... I will say this... Its your opinion so I respect it, All im saying is IMO give the lad a few games to see if he can do anything this year.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bugg Posted 1 September 2013 Share Posted 1 September 2013 Vardy, in his first few games, showed a willingness to get involved and linked up the play very neatly. He also scored four goals in his first six weeks with us. Futacs, from what I've seen, is slow, doesn't jump, is poor in the air and half decent on the ground. We signed Futacs on the back of a match against Portsmouth where he did ok, he's a poor man's Steve Howard and is not worth playing or keeping. That's generous, I'd say he's more of a poor man's Mark De Vries Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spiritwalker Posted 1 September 2013 Share Posted 1 September 2013 He was signed for a nominal fee and will be on relatively low wages so he wont be a priority to get off the books. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cityfanlee23 Posted 1 September 2013 Author Share Posted 1 September 2013 City fan lee 8years old ,come on what have you seen we ain't? He's played 9 times with 5 of them being sub for about 10 minutes run about... So we have not seen anything the lad can do... thats my point. give him a chance? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cityfanlee23 Posted 1 September 2013 Author Share Posted 1 September 2013 He was signed for a nominal fee and will be on relatively low wages so he wont be a priority to get off the books. What do you think he's on? 8k a week? Just my guess.. Think Vardy is on something like that... could sign another promising youngster for that... if im correct... 8k is 8k... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greatness_Since_1884 Posted 1 September 2013 Share Posted 1 September 2013 Clearly not in Nigel's plans. 7th choice behind Hopper now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Col city fan Posted 1 September 2013 Share Posted 1 September 2013 Daft signing by Pearson. It's unlike him, generally, to sign duffers, but with Futacs I have no idea what he was thinking of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy Posted 1 September 2013 Share Posted 1 September 2013 Daft signing by Pearson. It's unlike him, generally, to sign duffers, but with Futacs I have no idea what he was thinking of. his record with buying strikers for us if ****ing awful, fits in perfectly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fox96 Posted 1 September 2013 Share Posted 1 September 2013 Doesn't matter if he's on little, it all adds up? Could get a decent player on his wages, most probably. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haydos Posted 1 September 2013 Share Posted 1 September 2013 So was vardy at the start.... You are basing "Woeful" on 9 appearances including 5 sub appearances... So wood last year must have been disgracing the club when he had his poor run... Good job leicester fans are not judges, they would be hung before the accused had finished the oath.. Again.... Based on 9 appearances... 5 sub apps.. Did you say this about vardy? Or wood on his bad run? Do you take the training sessions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cityfanlee23 Posted 1 September 2013 Author Share Posted 1 September 2013 Do you take the training sessions? No, do you?? We all know pearson gets his favourites.... Marshall looked one of our brightest players until he hit bad form... now he's gone in a year.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaspa Posted 1 September 2013 Share Posted 1 September 2013 Remember quite a few people on here that rated him and were saying we should sign him up whilst he was playing with Pompey Its a shame its not worked out as weve heard little from him regarding his lack of game time, the only thing he seems to have done here though is make friends with Knocky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cityfanlee23 Posted 1 September 2013 Author Share Posted 1 September 2013 Remember quite a few people on here that rated him and were saying we should sign him up whilst he was playing with Pompey Its a shame its not worked out as weve heard little from him regarding his lack of game time, the only thing he seems to have done here though is make friends with Knocky Just feels to me like another player that has been handled incorrectly... His personal opinion may be different.. so I suppose this is one of the downfalls of having a club that keeps everything so secret. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamafox Posted 1 September 2013 Share Posted 1 September 2013 I'm guessing Futacs hasn't been included in any of our matchday squads so far this season, that tells you he is crap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.