Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
GLC

Leicester 0-1 Man City

Recommended Posts

Posted

imo your opinions are more extreme than DanLCFC's and if I get to the end of a Saturday night without reading something from him that he says is a joke or ridiculous I don't feel that I have had a good night but that is just imho.

Actually after his outburst the other day Corky is the one to watch imo. He is all calm when we're winning but as soon as we lose one/eleven game(s) he turns into a rabid animal.

Corky, a rabid animal! Sounds about right.  :thumbup:  lol

Posted

The January window appears likely to be a struggle, both to find, and convince such players to come here, when it looks more than likely we will be relegated.

Valid point

January is notoriously difficult anyway, never mind being bottom.

But money talks. Big fee as clubs know we're desperate and then it's quite a gamble for a player so expect high wages, big bonus should we stay up and clause allowing departure for a comparatively low fee should we go down

Posted

folk talking like. After Jans transfer window we will be a complete different team.

SO deluded to think A-we will attract them sort of players we are crying out for anyway and then B they can just slot in and play like they've been here all season.

P.s think some posters need to chiill out,go for a walk get some air and not return.for a few hours....genuinely worried about some peoples fixation on here to be right all the time and their general mental state!!!

Posted

Sonera folk talking like Jan we will be a complete different team.

SO deluded to think a we will attract them sort of players we are crying out for anyway and then they can just slot in and play like they've been her all season.

P.s think some posters need to chiill out,go for a walk get some air and nite return.for a few hours....genuinely worried about some peoples fixation on here to be right all the time!!!!

 

In fairness Raj, Mahrez played like he'd been here for years when he first turned up at the start of the year. What we can attract, and what it will cost, will be a different matter, but the premiership money will always be a lure. We might end up with a few mercenaries, we might end up with a few just looking at us as a springboard, but the sort of players we need will come, just not necessarily for the right reasons.

Posted

I hope the right players DO come whatever the price as long as it keeps us up...just think it maybe too late by then...hope Im well and truly wrong though

Guest Col city fan
Posted

I hope the right players DO come whatever the price as long as it keeps us up...just think it maybe too late by then...hope Im well and truly wrong though

So it IS now a good thing that we pay 'whatever' the price for our signings?

Christ how the tide turns on here.

Posted

For the record. I Dont want us spending OTT for players or wages.

But if that genuine quality is there and want 10-20% more in wages than what we are paying already id go for it!!!

But no,paying shed loads of cash isn't the answer imho.

Posted

So it IS now a good thing that we pay 'whatever' the price for our signings?

Christ how the tide turns on here.

I've always said we spend money and lots of it, on quality to keep us up. I understand the risks, and I believe they are worth it
Posted

I'm no psychologist, but probably because his team conceded a goal?

Eh, if you don't want to be called a moron, don't act like one.

Because we were on the attack, he takes up a position on the halfway line, like a striker. He starts pushing forward the moment they win the ball back, like a striker. If because he was on the halfway line when they won the ball, that makes it a run from midfield, then every goal a striker gets from a counter attack is a midfielders goal. He positioned himself the way Nugent did last season, as a support striker. It's quite clearly Simpsons fault for being woefully out of position and putting Wes up against nasri, then ignoring wasyls attempts to organise the defence

Interesting listening to the football forum last night. Matt Elliott when talking about the goal says 'Cambiasso lost his man which is unlike him'.

Is he a 'moron' too then?

Posted

I'd say that if one particular player is to blame then it's Konchesky.

He should have spotted the danger.

 

However, Schlupp, Simpson, Cambiasso, Morgan and Wasyl all make mistakes as well.

 

Well, despite the improvements to Saturday’s team selection and formation, we were once again playing without a Defensive Midfielder.

 

If the opposition Midfielder breaks forward then your defensive midfielder usually tracks back to cover him. Cambiasso started to go with Lampard but then kind of just gave up.

 

Cambiasso’s error. However the exclusion of our best defensive midfielder by the Manager (James) means that Pearson is more to blame.

Guest Col city fan
Posted

Interesting listening to the football forum last night. Matt Elliott when talking about the goal says 'Cambiasso lost his man which is unlike him'.

Is he a 'moron' too then?

So thats Robbie Savage and Matt Elliott. Yes, according to 'The Doctor' both morons I suspect?

There aint none so blind as those who won't see (or summat along those lines).

Posted

So thats Robbie Savage and Matt Elliott. Yes, according to 'The Doctor' both morons I suspect?

There aint none so blind as those who won't see (or summat along those lines).

 

Don't forget me. I'm also a moron lumping this on Cambiasso too.

 

He starts tracking Lampard but then just kind of goes "ah fvck it, someone else will cover for me..."

 

Which incidentally, was pretty much as happened for Villa's winning goal when poor old Schlupp moves across to cover for an invisible Cambiasso.

Posted

Don't forget me. I'm also a moron lumping this on Cambiasso too.

He starts tracking Lampard but then just kind of goes "ah fvck it, someone else will cover for me..."

Which incidentally, was pretty much as happened for Villa's winning goal when poor old Schlupp moves across to cover for an invisible Cambiasso.

Gerrard's goal too. Cambiasso leaves him unmarked. Wes copped the blame for that one though because apparently he 'assisted Gerrard'. I viewed it as him stretching desperately trying to clear a ball. Poor clearance, but once again there's a man unmarked to put it in.

Collectively we are so so bad defensively

Posted

So thats Robbie Savage and Matt Elliott. Yes, according to 'The Doctor' both morons I suspect?

There aint none so blind as those who won't see (or summat along those lines).

 

Savage is a complete tool and as for Elliott, good player but I've never found myself agreeing with anything he's said on RL during the matches. It's quite clear that not having a centre-back in the centre dealing with the strikers from a cross is criminal - it's clearly simpson that is at fault, woefully out of position and ignores the instructions to get back into it from Wasyl.

 

Don't forget me. I'm also a moron lumping this on Cambiasso too.

 

He starts tracking Lampard but then just kind of goes "ah fvck it, someone else will cover for me..."

 

Which incidentally, was pretty much as happened for Villa's winning goal when poor old Schlupp moves across to cover for an invisible Cambiasso.

 

lol  lol  lol - Cambiasso at fault for Huttons goal last week? Either you've got a vendetta against him and want to blame him for everything or you didn't actually watch the match. Konchesky is the one whose gone missing at the far post, and Wasyl was well out of position.

Posted

Savage is a complete tool and as for Elliott, good player but I've never found myself agreeing with anything he's said on RL during the matches. It's quite clear that not having a centre-back in the centre dealing with the strikers from a cross is criminal - it's clearly simpson that is at fault, woefully out of position and ignores the instructions to get back into it from Wasyl.

Yep- I've gotta say, you are clearly right and obviously know more than two paid pundits who played more than 500 games in the prem between them.

Guest Col city fan
Posted

Don't forget lads. It's 'The Doctor'..he's always right. I hope he ain't an actual Doctor. If he's as bad with the scalpel as he is in his football acumen, I'd cancel my surgery..

Posted

Don't forget lads. It's 'The Doctor'..he's always right. I hope he ain't an actual Doctor. If he's as bad with the scalpel as he is in his football acumen, I'd cancel my surgery..

There's all sorts of doctors.

 

Would you like to meet mine? He's called Ph.D.

Guest Col city fan
Posted

There's all sorts of doctors.

Would you like to meet mine? He's called Ph.D.

And.....?

lol

Posted

There's all sorts of doctors.

Would you like to meet mine? He's called Ph.D.

I thought I was your Doctor.

There's only one doctor on this site and that's me, the other ones a wannabe punk, that needs a slap

And.....?

lol

Don't trust him, he says that to all the boys to lure them to his den
Guest Col city fan
Posted

I thought I was your Doctor.

There's only one doctor on this site and that's me, the other ones a wannabe punk, that needs a slap

Don't trust him, he says that to all the boys to lure them to his den

Are you an actual Dr? Dr?

Posted

Savage is a complete tool and as for Elliott, good player but I've never found myself agreeing with anything he's said on RL during the matches. It's quite clear that not having a centre-back in the centre dealing with the strikers from a cross is criminal - it's clearly simpson that is at fault, woefully out of position and ignores the instructions to get back into it from Wasyl.

Yep- I've gotta say, you are clearly right and obviously know more than two paid pundits who played more than 500 games in the prem between them.

 

Being a good player doesn't make you a good pundit, just as it doesn't make you a good manager,  and as for being paid - Don Goodman is a paid professional pundit, as is Peter Beagrie. Being a professional pundit doesn't mean you can't be hopelessly wrong.

Posted

I've always said we spend money and lots of it, on quality to keep us up. I understand the risks, and I believe they are worth it

As long as it isn't your own money, that is!!! :D

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...