lestajigs Posted 15 February 2015 Share Posted 15 February 2015 Didn't hear any pearson songs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dogadug Posted 15 February 2015 Share Posted 15 February 2015 Didn't hear any pearson songs One Nigel Pearson was definitely sang in the first few minutes in the stand opposite the dugout Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maybes Posted 15 February 2015 Share Posted 15 February 2015 Agree with a lot of posts in here. More team selections and performances like that and the Pearson supporters will turn on him. Don't get me wrong I'm a Pearson fan but today was a ****ing joke. Still absolutely livid. Our best chance of getting to the later stages of the cup and we pissed it up the wall, while Pearson just stood there and watched. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ADK Posted 16 February 2015 Share Posted 16 February 2015 Today was crap from the manager no doubt about that. I hope he stays and keeps us up though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve_Guppy_Left_Foot Posted 16 February 2015 Share Posted 16 February 2015 Threads like this make me so glad he's blocked, so many posts, I can only imagine the absolute guff being spouted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted 16 February 2015 Share Posted 16 February 2015 Let people support who they want. Correct. Anyone who pays their money can sing/say what they want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeattleShane Posted 16 February 2015 Share Posted 16 February 2015 Today was crap from the manager no doubt about that. I hope he stays and keeps us up though. And how is he going to do that, what will he change? four wins from 20 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarshallForEngland Posted 16 February 2015 Share Posted 16 February 2015 I wish there was a way to monitor whether anybody actually changes their mind on here because of what someone else on this forum has said. I don't doubt that there are people who once supported Pearson and now don't, but it seems the change of mind is normally induced by how events are unfolding and not because somebody's carefully crafted argument has enlightened them. That's why everyone's so unpleasant and hostile on here; nobody is actually interested in hearing any arguments against their position and nobody has in their mind some hypothetical explanation or evidence that would lead them to alter their stance. Every conversation is like 2 separate conversations that have one or two words in common; it's just a constant reiteration of each person's position followed by virtually no attempt to substantiate it. "Pearson out" is delivered as if it's an argument on its own that requires no further explanation, and those who say it have no intention of accepting or even considering any argument that recommends an alternative. What's the point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ozleicester Posted 16 February 2015 Share Posted 16 February 2015 I wish there was a way to monitor whether anybody actually changes their mind on here because of what someone else on this forum has said. I don't doubt that there are people who once supported Pearson and now don't, but it seems the change of mind is normally induced by how events are unfolding and not because somebody's carefully crafted argument has enlightened them. That's why everyone's so unpleasant and hostile on here; nobody is actually interested in hearing any arguments against their position and nobody has in their mind some hypothetical explanation or evidence that would lead them to alter their stance. Every conversation is like 2 separate conversations that have one or two words in common; it's just a constant reiteration of each person's position followed by virtually no attempt to substantiate it. "Pearson out" is delivered as if it's an argument on its own that requires no further explanation, and those who say it have no intention of accepting or even considering any argument that recommends an alternative. What's the point? Fair points. I think however i may have changed my mind after the Villa game. I had been supportive of keeping NP even if we went down, as i think he clearly has the abilities to succeed in the Championship, but following that depressing spectacle at Villa park, i wonder if keeping him would be the wrong thing considering the negative baggage he (and his players) would return to the Championship with. If he cant get a side to play better than that, against a decidedly poor opposition. If he is unable to make sensible and effective team selections, structures and SUBSTITUTIONS, then we are headed for a dismal end to the season and that may(possibly) wash over to the next season. We all assumed and he said, that its important to start the season with the confidence that winning the league gave us.. so (assuming relegation, which given yesterdays performance is a fair assumption), maybe having the man that took us down in such a dismal fashion would bring too much negativity onto the new side required to get us promoted? Im not saying Pearson out... but i am... wondering Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burmesefox Posted 16 February 2015 Share Posted 16 February 2015 I wish there was a way to monitor whether anybody actually changes their mind on here because of what someone else on this forum has said. I don't doubt that there are people who once supported Pearson and now don't, but it seems the change of mind is normally induced by how events are unfolding and not because somebody's carefully crafted argument has enlightened them. That's why everyone's so unpleasant and hostile on here; nobody is actually interested in hearing any arguments against their position and nobody has in their mind some hypothetical explanation or evidence that would lead them to alter their stance. Every conversation is like 2 separate conversations that have one or two words in common; it's just a constant reiteration of each person's position followed by virtually no attempt to substantiate it. "Pearson out" is delivered as if it's an argument on its own that requires no further explanation, and those who say it have no intention of accepting or even considering any argument that recommends an alternative. What's the point? You have to accept that forums are a means of throwing ideas into the mix to canvas opinion and exchange theories. It's a conversation, albeit at times s pissed pub conversation. People throw in suggestions that they wouldn't dream of being heard said on the concourses. The forum gives s degree of anonymity and so people will gravely throw more extreme ideas out there. It isn't reality it's just a forum. People will change theiribds and pursue different avenues of Thought. Ask me about np? I've changed my mind several times. Personally, when we lost to Watford in the playoffs i knew he wasn't good enough for the prem. despite that I've been a 'stick with him' fan now I'm starting to believe the Pearson out mob were right all along. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaelicFox Posted 16 February 2015 Author Share Posted 16 February 2015 Guppy rub your right foot hard and fast and release some tension in your left one, you still managed to have a good read lol and I'm being nice chapie know your a sensitive lad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ollie93 Posted 16 February 2015 Share Posted 16 February 2015 So say we get rid of Pearson and get someone else in, it goes one of two ways, 1) They miraculously manage to keep us up and we all praise and say it should of happened sooner OR 2) We get relegated anyway, lose the man who got us here and then the question is asked as to why we got rid of him. His decisions yesterday annoyed me, like they did a lot of supporters, but without proper consideration as to who we would bring instead of him would put us in a worse place. Anyone who is saying the statement "anybody would do a better job than him", is a silly thing to say really, sacking him won't suddenly make everything better as the grass isn't always greener, as it might have a negative effect on the players, rather than the positive effect we are all hoping it has. But I accept the fact that something needs to be done. Just my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hackneyfox Posted 16 February 2015 Share Posted 16 February 2015 The argument that he will automatically get us back up is no longer valid should we end up bottom of the division. The 2 other relegated sides will clearly be better than us. I'm struggling to work out what our squad would be as many will be too old and the best ones (ho ho) will leave. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScouseFox Posted 16 February 2015 Share Posted 16 February 2015 The argument that he will automatically get us back up is no longer valid should we end up bottom of the division. The 2 other relegated sides will clearly be better than us. I'm struggling to work out what our squad would be as many will be too old and the best ones (ho ho) will leave. yeah cos that's exactly how it works. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DB11 Posted 16 February 2015 Share Posted 16 February 2015 The only thing 3-4k fans could sing was "We're the left side [...] we're the right side" and "LEICESTER" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hackneyfox Posted 16 February 2015 Share Posted 16 February 2015 yeah cos that's exactly how it works. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScouseFox Posted 16 February 2015 Share Posted 16 February 2015 good solid point, well made. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaelicFox Posted 16 February 2015 Author Share Posted 16 February 2015 So say we get rid of Pearson and get someone else in, it goes one of two ways, 1) They miraculously manage to keep us up and we all praise and say it should of happened sooner OR 2) We get relegated anyway, lose the man who got us here and then the question is asked as to why we got rid of him. His decisions yesterday annoyed me, like they did a lot of supporters, but without proper consideration as to who we would bring instead of him would put us in a worse place. Anyone who is saying the statement "anybody would do a better job than him", is a silly thing to say really, sacking him won't suddenly make everything better as the grass isn't always greener, as it might have a negative effect on the players, rather than the positive effect we are all hoping it has. But I accept the fact that something needs to be done. Just my opinion. Good points Get Martin Jol in Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ollie93 Posted 16 February 2015 Share Posted 16 February 2015 Good points Get Martin Jol in And if Martin Jol comes in, we get relegated, we are a shadow of our former self in the championship and we end up mid-table, what then? Just another replacement? Until we find someone to do what Pearson did and take us back up? Just trying to show both sides of the coin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GaelicFox Posted 16 February 2015 Author Share Posted 16 February 2015 And if Martin Jol comes in, we get relegated, we are a shadow of our former self in the championship and we end up mid-table, what then? Just another replacement? Until we find someone to do what Pearson did and take us back up? Just trying to show both sides of the coin. Your banking a lot on him being able to do it His squad of last year is now shot to pieces and battle scars are open wounds Cannot see how he arrests that slipping If they rally between now and May then ok maybe he should get a good shot at next year If they continue to slide looking clueless tactically then obviously a change is needed Let's see if he can produce a rally for the last few months of season Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ollie93 Posted 16 February 2015 Share Posted 16 February 2015 Your banking a lot on him being able to do it His squad of last year is now shot to pieces and battle scars are open wounds Cannot see how he arrests that slipping If they rally between now and May then ok maybe he should get a good shot at next year If they continue to slide looking clueless tactically then obviously a change is needed Let's see if he can produce a rally for the last few months of season Of course, I hope as much as everyone else that we pull it together and stay up! At the end of the day we have to live with what decisions are made at the club. There's no point in arguing amongst ourselves, or shouting negative comments at the games, this doesn't really help anyone. There's still a chance we can stay up, no matter how small! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C-man Posted 16 February 2015 Share Posted 16 February 2015 yeah cos that's exactly how it works. Yep. We should exactly finish in 18th because that's exactly how it works. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legend_in_blue Posted 16 February 2015 Share Posted 16 February 2015 If you don't like it, don't go... Read the sig! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parafox Posted 16 February 2015 Share Posted 16 February 2015 I still think it would a bad idea to sack him. Since we're going down we'll need someone who's spent time in the championship. He'll have the experience that other managers there do not. I'm sure he'll get us back up again. Oh for Gods sake.... Brick wall and headbanging... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darko2k7 Posted 16 February 2015 Share Posted 16 February 2015 Thing that confuses me with some anti and pro pearson posters is when they put their arguments across as if to convince the other to agree with them is that the way they go about it . Why would you think that the best way to go about this is by talking down to people or resorting to personal insults. Some times I read a well writen post making good points then they ruin it all with a moronic sentence at the end. Then all that I have just read becomes irrelevant and all can think is what a twat that person is . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.