Bluearmyfox28

It could, look at England last night with Foden and Bellingham.

Do we usually find out the amount being paid to the club for main shirt sponsorship?

The only way I see this formation working is if you have a deep lying forward linking up the play. From an attacking sense the wing back and wingers are surely going to end up getting in each others way?

No brainier for me, on his day was one of the best ball winning midfielders. With the amount of needs this squad has, keeping him will allow for finances to be spent elsewhere.

Fatawu.

Hope that statement shuts up all the muppets trying to give him stick for leaving.

As long as KDH’s sale falls under last seasons accounting period, we have made £80m on the departures of Enzo, KDH and Barnes. I would be shocked if we haven’t complied with PSR regulations based of that alone.

Desperation Ric that’s why.

The lad looks class but I find it strange to spend a big sum on a position that we already have Mavididi and Fatawu. Especially with huge gaps in the squad that need filling.

How’s that? Have close to bare minimum knowledge on PSR.

Am I right In thinking the 3 year cycle is the seasons of 22/23, 23/24 and 24/25? Just to note the 22/23 season we made a loss of £89.7m, which gives us room of around £16m for last season and this upcoming season. That’s not even including the deduction from the championship.

In: Golding £5m (previous accounting year) Fatawu £14.5m Total £19.5m Out: KDH £30m (previous accounting year) Total £30m Net spend = +£11.5m will update throughout the season.

Pretty sure the club publicly stated in the past they won’t involve clauses like these after the Kante transfer.

Should have no effect, Alves I believe will play as a left winger in men’s football and Braybrooke is a deep lying playmaker, where as Golding is a no.10/8

If we’ve sold KDH for £30m but agreed to sign a lad from Chelsea for £5m doesn’t that effectively mean Chelsea got KDH for £25m? Cheap if so. Not complaining by the way I think it’s the right move for the club sadly at KDH’s expense.

Without the sale of KDH we would have again failed PSR, publicly stated by multiple ITK journalists. So yes we have effectively told him he has to leave, I would imagine that’s why he was at the training ground with Rudkin the day of the Cooper interview.

3 minimum needed if you include a couple of no.10’s and that’s including Wilf.

Seems a tidy player from that highlight video, one thing I did notice though is he seems very one footed. Promising core for the future though, we will have four England u18 starters in Nelson, Alves, Braybrooke and Golding. Great foundation to build on and all play in separate positions.

Truthfully I think KDH would have struggled to fit in under Cooper. Having looked at Cooper’s set up’s, his midfield usually consists of a ball winning midfielder, deep lying playmaker and a creative number 10. KDH doesn’t fall under any of those categories.

Why would you stay somewhere you’re not wanted? I’m lucky enough to have grown up playing football at academy level, but one thing that’s so clear seeing friends playing professionally is people treat footballers like robots, they are still human. Let’s put it in everyday terms, you turn up to work and get told you no longer have a role in a team and unfortunately they need to transfer you to another team and if you don’t do that effectively the company would be ****ed. Then you know moving forward management would believe it’s your fault for the mess as you refused to leave and everyday you have to go into work feeling uncomfortable. What would you do? Naturally you’ll either look elsewhere for a job or transfer to the other team as you are no longer wanted. It’s sh*t but your cards have effectively been dealt for you. I am struggling to understand how you are not seeing this?

After being told he needs to leave? He’s chosen a manager that he had his best season under and a team that’s going to pay him stupid money. Let alone the fact he will live in London and re unite with Madders, Chilwell etc in London. Your seeming to forget that we’ve effectively forced him out to cover our own negligence. So if you think that warrants stick then I don’t know what to tell you.

Perfect, was originally gonna say it’s irrelevant as long as it covers PSR but would of been nice rinsing them for a few more million, especially if we sign the young lad for £5/£10m effectively means we’ve sold KDH for £20/£25m.

Dumb post, he publicly stated he hasn’t requested to leave. He’s clearly been forced out to cover PSR. Anyone that gives KDH stick for leaving needs to give their head a wobble.

For any PSR guru’s how does the 3 year cycle get decided? Is it current season and previous 2 seasons or do they set out specific 3 year periods? Basically what I am asking, in terms of amount made for KDH does it carry over for future PSR seasons or will it effectively just cover this 3 year cycle and be irrelevant on the books from tomorrow onwards? I hope that makes sense

He’s better in the build up play in my opinion too.