orangecity23

I'm not an auditor, but I find every time after going to the KP recently, I tend to end up increasingly more concerned after watching our shambles of a team playing

It didn't end with a clean sheet, so it must have been.

Chainsaw Man movie was superb. One of the best films I've seen in ages, of any kind.

Conceding an equaliser to that giant nonce and his manbun. FFS

Feck it. Vesterdog up front, make it happen.

Not sure there's enough time left to do a podcast

So Alan Young, who's your man of the match? I'D GIVE TO THE BIG MAN, KEIFFER MOORE.

I'm convinced there will still be people saying "we used to be in League One" when we are actually back in it.

Terrible stuff that cramp. Started in his right foot, then when the physio came on it had moved to his right knee. Then a minute later it was in his left leg instead.

Struggling to remember the last time I saw one of our games with an actually competent ref in. I remember Sam Allison being good, but that was about 2 years ago now, since then it's been the Gavin Wards and Keith Strouds on endless repeat.

If their good structure comes from Bloom himself downwards then they will probably be fine long term, although they have to contend with the Big 6 poaching their staff as well as their players. Our problems stemmed from the fact that all the best parts of our off the field structure came from Pearson, not the higher up leadership of the club, so once he was gone, the whole thing eroded as key staff left and were poorly replaced, coupled with some extremely poor decision making at the top.

Brighton are living large on the money from the big sales they've made to the big 6. If that pipeline were to dry up for whatever reason, be that bad recruitment, or the big 6 choosing to cut back on spending, or spend their ill gotten gains elsewhere, then they might not be as profitable or financially viable as they are now. They have to keep an iron grip on the wage bill, and that isn't the easiest thing to do when every other club in the division isn't necessarily doing that, and you've got agents agitating your best players to tell them they are underpaid all the time.

Do the people who say "Fatawa" think that his chant is to the tune of Voulesz Va, by Abbu?

WOOF

Worse case scenario, they start up front, play badly, fail to score and give the ball away a lot. If that happened, they'd still be on the same level as the actual strikers we have

Daka isn't having a great game or anything (tidy assist mind), but because he is taking up proper striking positions and at least threatening to get in behind it means our overall attacking shape is miles better than when Ayew has been up top (but most frequently elsewhere on the pitch). Bob's been getting into some good positions as well, he's done pretty well at 10.

That should be a straight red. Elbow right in the face. Cards are only given to Leicester players tonight though, standard EFL reffing.

Ref definitely reads Adrian Chiles's weekly column in the Guardian and laughs out loud at it, before forwardng the link to everyone in his WhatApp groups.

Referee crying into his Adrian Chiles printed vest when his beloved Baggies conceeded that equaliser.

Wrong Jordan subbed off

Didn't design it, that was the Conservatives, but carried it on anyways. Point being, we've just introduced one piece of legislation that requires lots more online checking of personal information than before, that has been done in a poorly thought through manner, affecting vast swathes of the internet more than what was promoted as the reason for the new laws. Now we are adding to that with a new digital ID, is there anything from past experience to indicate this legislation will be properly thought through, and the system designed will be extremely robust, and carefully designed to protect personal information? Or will it be as poorly thought through and implemented as the online age checking was? Given today's Guardian article states that the government believes the system will be cost effective and some of the development will be done in house, my money would be on whatever they produce being not up to the task, especially given the idea that it will be so widely used just makes it a bigger target and leads to more potential avenues of cyber attack. We've seen repeatedly that personal data is not safe with large corporations, or UK government departments. Cyber criminals will target them and steal it. This is creating the biggest, fattest golden goose of a target for them.

The worst part of the digital ID is the potential target for cyber criminals. Sticking everyone's most important personal data into one place with widely used external access to check it is a giant target for crims. How long until the government is apologising when the entire countries personal data is stolen? The "oh, it's just for checking if people are immigrants/ok to start jobs" line rings a bit hollow as well, given the government has already rolled out legislation that means we now have to produce our ID to access filthy adult websites such as *checks notes* Reddit, Spotify or cycling forums.

I thought the most dangerous thing in the Oxford game was the striker doing the old Harry Kane sneaky backing in to Luke Thomas while he was jumping for a header, he flipped him so much he nearly landed on his neck. Naturally the ref wasn't slightly bothered by it.

Big 6 player shocked to unexpectedly not be allowed to make 18 yellow card offences in a game without being sent off.