Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Tommy G

Member
  • Posts

    11,578
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by Tommy G

  1. I'm not ''going on about it'' just pointing out the odd spelling mistake doesn't matter in the grand scheme of things!! Anyway back to legends of our time.
  2. Who are the other two?
  3. My point being I've managed to make a decent living despite making the odd faux pas on a football forum with my spelling now and again...
  4. Whoosh....nevermind.
  5. No it won’t be easy but we’ll have to be creative, maybe some loans out and paying a small % of wages etc. whatever happens we can’t have anyone on those kind of wages next season
  6. Most players in L1 are paid at most between £5-£15K a week, so your £50K threshold is way off.
  7. More likely to get Ian Beale
  8. They could do a sale and leaseback but you’d typically do that in a business where the commercial property is revenue generating and the investor can easily flip that property later down the line. There is no way anyone would buy the thing and lease it back given the specific nature and single use aspect, and also given how precarious the financial situation is. You could probably borrow against it but with risk factor it would be close to double digit interest, could get cheaper money elsewhere.
  9. Who have we signed since 1st July 2025 of any significant value?
  10. Agree hence my alarm at someone saying he would want billions
  11. No he wouldn’t want billions for it
  12. Why would you need to resort to abuse though? It would actually make better viewing if he had asked some really difficult questions and then Top & Co were squirming and quickly aborted - it would show what kind of owner he is, a complete coward and couldn’t even face up to a fan asking some difficult questions. We were never going to get any sensible or coherent responses from Top, he isn’t going to pull out a 5 year plan (capability aside) and start going through it with a few random lcfc fans. Everyone gets criticism now and again, don’t take it to heart especially from people you don’t know from Adam. He needed something to get his arse twitching and heart rate up - it would be great to see what kind of operator he was in that situation as every output we’ve suffered so far from him is some clinical, set up, sanitised bullsh*t.
  13. The kind of bloke that orders a happy meal
  14. Steve Robertshaw is a bell pass it on
  15. Sounds good to me - we’re talking about the corrupt stuff here
  16. Skipp will be on £50K + a week, he'll be off.
  17. And how will he save face after just promoting him a few months back? That kind of stuff is important to them. Not a chance IMO
  18. I don't normally snipe at people on instagram but I couldn't resist today - there appears to be some kind of overwhelming support for Top following that video, they aren't bots either with their comments. I've just had a classic ''be careful what you wish for'' and ''we are back to our roots now'' I'm not sure I've got the energy to reply but these cretins walk among us.
  19. I think it is a childhood issue with some people. Maybe they didn't grow up with a significant figure in their lives, a father figure or something similar, and now choose to follow Top despite what he's done to the club....almost unwavering support that a mother might have of her son who's just committed a heinous crime. That kind of stuff. I can't understand it's any other reason.
  20. Get her in the birds you fancy off the telly thread, better than snooker refs ffs. Emily Carney, google is your friend.
  21. Even a basic level of intelligence can understand how we got here? We'd still be in with a chance of playing at the top level had Top and his ''management team'' not mismanaged the whole club over the past 4 years ++ so the 6 point thing is just a distraction from the real issues here.
  22. Too much - can I get a whip-round
  23. Dear Tom, Thank you so much for responding to the Trust’s request for help from members. I note from our records, that you are not currently a member of the Foxes Trust. The Trust’s Rules and Policies require that any members of our Board Subgroups, must be paid-up members of the Trust. Therefore, as we have been fortunate enough to receive offers of assistance from our members with similar professional experience to yourself, we will at present need to put your offer of help on hold. We would like to keep your details on file as there may be an occasion in the future when we may require additional assistance at Board level, whereby we could co-opt an external advisor for a short period of time. Kind regards,
  24. FINALLY SOME SENSE
×
×
  • Create New...