Bagworthblue Posted 5 July 2015 Author Posted 5 July 2015 It's a fair kop! Seriously? Suspect the media side take a look from time to time to feedback from here and the other sites but the last bit? Really? i was extremely bored, and suffering from insomnia - just a bit of fun :-)
ARM1968 Posted 5 July 2015 Posted 5 July 2015 The NSA probably. Might be Pearson, James the hand or Nigel the numpty.
foxinsocks Posted 5 July 2015 Posted 5 July 2015 Most organisations monitor social media - normally they buy in such a service to report back on trends and themes. Of course many of these organisations are consumer brands seeking to monitor "buzz" and gain insights into consumer likes, dislikes, preferences and opinions on products and reputation (and also to monitor their competitors) so that they can refine marketing messages and steer product options and pricing. They will also monitor rumours to seek if things are -ve they need to counter... or if things are leaking out that are supposed to be secret. (They may even give suspected leakers "barium meals" - I.e. some false rumour to leak to see if it emerges.) Many organisations will plant rumours an opinions into the social media world - by feeding "influencors" who will pass them on. That's life.
MPH Posted 5 July 2015 Posted 5 July 2015 NSA and GCHQ. Not that the care a hoot about LCFC but they watch and store everything. ... ' watch' is not quite the right word.. Everything is filtered through a supercomputer System which is set up to flag calls and emails once certain words or phrases are mentioned. If anything suspicious is found then you make it onto the watch list were someone, if you're lucky, will physically glance over what you have been doing or they might even listen to a call or two....
foxinsocks Posted 5 July 2015 Posted 5 July 2015 the volume is so high they have to sample based on triggers or changes in behaviour
leftbackinthechangingroom Posted 5 July 2015 Posted 5 July 2015 Okay you got me i confess. I was the second gunman that shot jfk....
stillwater Posted 5 July 2015 Posted 5 July 2015 If your watching can I ask why you didn't leave him sacked the first time, He probably deserved it then, he got lucky by playing shit or bust in the last 9 games something we started the season doing until he tried to get all tactical, which he was shit at. Now people see him as the messiah again :0
DANGEROUS TIGER Posted 6 July 2015 Posted 6 July 2015 Wish it was me, but it isn't! Sorry to disappoint most of you.
Nalis Posted 6 July 2015 Posted 6 July 2015 Pearson has probably taken a sneaky peak at the forum to gauge support, went into the General Chat thread by accident and is now got addicted to The Tinder Thread.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.