Mike Oxlong Posted 12 January 2016 Posted 12 January 2016 It's a french newsreader, I can't remember her name.Yeah , that's right. Good memory.Don't remember them being flat myself. Just a nice handful and a half.
Webbo Posted 12 January 2016 Posted 12 January 2016 I'm sure there was a pic of her topless on holiday, I'd better do some research. EDIT; Oh yes. Not flat chested but not that big either, she must have filled out with age.
Mike Oxlong Posted 12 January 2016 Posted 12 January 2016 I'm sure there was a pic of her topless on holiday, I'd better do some research. EDIT; Oh yes. Not flat chested but not that big either, she must have filled out with age. Yes there is.Can't post it on here though Now 37 and a proper milf If you like a bit more in your hand ...
ScouseFox Posted 18 January 2016 Posted 18 January 2016 serena williams looking a pya 11/10 right now swear to god
Wymsey Posted 18 January 2016 Posted 18 January 2016 Think this thread might go as well eventually, with all this clamping down to please Google.
leicsmac Posted 18 January 2016 Posted 18 January 2016 Think this thread might go as well eventually, with all this clamping down to please Google. Google being an American company, might it be the case that we can show pics of some horrific violence of whatever kind and get a pass but any kind of nudity (at all) is considered taboo. That would make sense with the overall moral compass.
ScouseFox Posted 18 January 2016 Posted 18 January 2016 also interesting (not really) chat we had in work the other day, how do you pronounce nude? is it nood (kinda rhymes with food or dude) or is it newd (like new with a d on the end)? or are they two different words?
leicsmac Posted 18 January 2016 Posted 18 January 2016 also interesting (not really) chat we had in work the other day, how do you pronounce nude? is it nood (kinda rhymes with food or dude) or is it newd (like new with a d on the end)? or are they two different words? The former is the US pronunciation, the latter the UK pronunciation, so strictly speaking both sides are right.
ScouseFox Posted 18 January 2016 Posted 18 January 2016 The former is the US pronunciation, the latter the UK pronunciation, so strictly speaking both sides are right. nah the us dont do nothing right bro
Fox92 Posted 18 January 2016 Posted 18 January 2016 also interesting (not really) chat we had in work the other day, how do you pronounce nude? is it nood (kinda rhymes with food or dude) or is it newd (like new with a d on the end)? or are they two different words? "Nood" for me.
leicsmac Posted 18 January 2016 Posted 18 January 2016 nah the us dont do nothing right bro Well, other than empire expansionism (they learned from the best, after all), but I see your point. I try to be magnanimous about the differences between US and UK spelling/pronunciation when I'm teaching (have to been even-handed), but yeah - what's with the way they say 'aluminium', for pity's sake?
Finnegan Posted 18 January 2016 Posted 18 January 2016 It's obviously nood to everyone but Scousers. Ofc Scouse says newd. He probably also says fewd and mewved.
Jordan Posted 18 January 2016 Posted 18 January 2016 Google being an American company, might it be the case that we can show pics of some horrific violence of whatever kind and get a pass but any kind of nudity (at all) is considered taboo. That would make sense with the overall moral compass.Stereotypes are a real time saver!https://support.google.com/adsense/answer/1348688?hl=en#Violent_content
Webbo Posted 18 January 2016 Posted 18 January 2016 I don't believe it's Google so much as the advertisers. Google are a business and they have to listen to their customers.
leicsmac Posted 18 January 2016 Posted 18 January 2016 Stereotypes are a real time saver! https://support.google.com/adsense/answer/1348688?hl=en#Violent_content Sorry Jordan, I should have laid on the sardonism a little more there to make it more obvious I was taking the mick. Obviously the advertisers want everything squeaky clean, including violence and nudity. I don't believe it's Google so much as the advertisers. Google are a business and they have to listen to their customers. Yeah, and the advertisers want everything clean and wholesome. Though is a lady (or a bloke) showing a little (and only a little) skin really that much of an affront to the eyes of the money men?
Webbo Posted 18 January 2016 Posted 18 January 2016 Sorry Jordan, I should have laid on the sardonism a little more there to make it more obvious I was taking the mick. Obviously the advertisers want everything squeaky clean, including violence and nudity. Yeah, and the advertisers want everything clean and wholesome. Though is a lady (or a bloke) showing a little (and only a little) skin really that much of an affront to the eyes of the money men? Who decides what's too much? You're always going to err on the side of safety. I can understand why kinder eggs wouldnt want an ad next to a pic of a woman with her ankles behind her ears. It's not just a case of decency though, there are women's groups who would object.
Jordan Posted 18 January 2016 Posted 18 January 2016 I also wonder if some of it stems from Google doing business in places with a wide range of mores, so they make it a policy to err on the side of caution or conservatism with their ad businesses. Who decides what's too much? You're always going to err on the side of safety. I can understand why kinder eggs would want an ad next to a pic of a woman with her ankles behind her ears. It's not just a case of decency though, there are women's groups who would object. But can we take a screenshot and post it in the Phunny Photos thread?
ScouseFox Posted 18 January 2016 Posted 18 January 2016 Who decides what's too much? You're always going to err on the side of safety. I can understand why kinder eggs wouldnt want an ad next to a pic of a woman with her ankles behind her ears. It's not just a case of decency though, there are women's groups who would object. women should only form groups if theyre gonna take their clothes off imo
Jordan Posted 18 January 2016 Posted 18 January 2016 women should only form groups if theyre gonna take their clothes off imoFive 2s = one 10
Miquel The Work Geordie Posted 18 January 2016 Posted 18 January 2016 TINCY SAYS HE SHAGS A RAPE VICTIM AN GOOGLE GIVE IT THE GREEN LIGHT MEANWHILE THANKS TO THE SAME COMAPNY WE'RE REDUCED TO WATCHING SCS ADS IN A THREAD THAT SHOULD BE FLESH FLESH FLESH PC GONE MAD
Wymsey Posted 19 January 2016 Posted 19 January 2016 Shame about the tattoos. Hopefully Google see it and agree to remove it.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.