Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
linemakers

Replacement for Mendy

Recommended Posts

Posted

Ok, curve ball but could Schlupp play the Kante role. Can drive forward with the ball, can tackle ( a little). Only concern is can he read the game well enough.

Posted
6 hours ago, Babylon said:

Were we? Numbers wise we had the same as last season, actually more if Inler stays because James is back... and I don't remember people being desperate for one like they are this year.

 

Drinkwater

Mendy

King

Amartey

James

Inler

 

Currently all on the books, we're going to need to shift one or two before we need more CM's.

Inlers on his way 

Posted

There is a lot of pressure on Mendy - he's relocated from another country, probably doesn't speak much English, he's integrating into a new club, and most of all trying to make an impression in a title-winning side.

 

He needs at least 10 games to prove himself; writing him off after 60 minutes is just insane.

 

Posted
5 hours ago, Babylon said:

So, are we basically writing off Mendy and Amertey as not going to be good enough? Are we saying James will not be good enough, despite him always being quite a good player for us.

 

Will a new guy get more than 50 minutes to show their capabilities?

 

I get the worry that we've not replaced Kante, but it feels like people want to get someone else in case what we've got isn't good enough... despite them not actually being given a chance yet.

 

I've got that worry as well don't get me wrong, but the club will look at assets like Amartey and say he's never going to get a chance if we bring someone else in ahead of him before he's even been here 8 months. If we don't have faith in them, then we need to get rid of some of them and bring ones in we do... as I'm not a fan of stock piling and not trying players.

We only have two weeks to get a player in if Mendy is out for a while

Posted
1 minute ago, linemakers said:

We only have two weeks to get a player in if Mendy is out for a while

The point was in relation to something else and not him being out injured. If he's going to be out for a while of course we're going to need players, especially if Inler does go.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Babylon said:

The point was in relation to something else and not him being out injured. If he's going to be out for a while of course we're going to need players, especially if Inler does go.

Yet we've only 9 days left and are notoriously abysmal at getting players in as transfer windows draw to a close. Let's hope and pray Mendy isn't out for long. Ranieri seems very reluctant to try Amartey in midfield which leaves just Drinkwater and King, a player whom was last a proper starter in our team in the Championship several seasons ago. I like the lad but I can't form any comfort that he's good enough to be starting for us in the PL and Champions League.

Posted
15 minutes ago, AS78UK said:

Ok, curve ball but could Schlupp play the Kante role. Can drive forward with the ball, can tackle ( a little). Only concern is can he read the game well enough.

keep curving that ball 

Posted
26 minutes ago, WigstonWanderer said:

Thought Mendy looked OK at times, but at others I got the impression he didn't want the ball. For example at throw ins. Actually, the whole team seemed a bit shy at thow ins. No one seemed to be making themselves available, leading to immediate loss of possession.

 

I know vaguely what you mean but in terms of wanting the ball we couldn't have signed someone who wants it more than Mendy it would seem.. 3rd most passes in Europe's top 5 leagues last year suggests he wants the ball and is comfortable on it.

 

Think it'd be more down to instructions from Ranieri etc and staying in shape in a midfield 2, whereas in a diamond at Nice he would see a lot more of the ball at the base of that shape. 

 

I thought he looked fitter and more energetic on Saturday anyway. Really frustrating if he's out for any length of time as i'd love to see him get half a dozen games alongside Drinks as i'm sure he'll be a great player.

Posted
25 minutes ago, AS78UK said:

Ok, curve ball but could Schlupp play the Kante role. Can drive forward with the ball, can tackle ( a little). Only concern is can he read the game well enough.

Your obviously someone who likes to think outside the box. Quite far outside it.

Posted
6 hours ago, justfoxes said:

Totally agree that Amartey can play in that position give him a chance to shine he's quick good on the ball and does like to tackle hard,you never know could be the ideal replacement !

So when exactly have you seen him play in that position ?  It's all subjective . From what I've seen of him I fully understand why he doesn't get any where near a starting slot . He looks lost and out of his depth on all occasions I've seen him play . If you really think he's a better option than King then  you really need to study the game a bit more .

Posted
8 hours ago, weller54 said:

I like Andy King (as a squad player) he did well when called upon last season. But he's just not good enough to be the regular partner for Drinkwater. He lacks energy and no longer has the legs to take on that role. He's not even a first choice for Wales!,  and the same logic applies. 

Fantastic servant of this club. 

A valuable squad member. 

Yes... But that's where it ends. 

I'm interested to know what you think about Amartey as his replacement ?  What do you think he can give that King can't ?

Posted
1 hour ago, Bunyip said:

I'm interested to know what you think about Amartey as his replacement ?  What do you think he can give that King can't ?

Physicality,  Energy? 

Posted
2 minutes ago, weller54 said:

Physicality,  Energy? 

Lots of players have that . And can be  all seen  playing at a lower level.  You Also need skill intelligence and the warewithall to be a star . I have seen so far nothing in Amartey's play to suggest any of those things . whereas King although not a top player can be relied on and knows how the team plays. If Amartey was good enough he would have pushed his way into the team already. 

Posted
14 minutes ago, Bunyip said:

Lots of players have that . And can be  all seen  playing at a lower level.  You Also need skill intelligence and the warewithall to be a star . I have seen so far nothing in Amartey's play to suggest any of those things . whereas King although not a top player can be relied on and knows how the team plays. If Amartey was good enough he would have pushed his way into the team already. 

Perhaps... Hasn't really been given a chance yet. Ideally we shouldn't have to play either King or Amartey.. We need a quality signing in that area and fast! But respect your views. 

Posted

Oliver Norwood, Rodrigues Araujo, Soriano Llido or Kamohelo Mokotjo, never heard of any of them except Norwood, but they've all got high defensive midfielder stats.

Posted
2 hours ago, AS78UK said:

Ok, curve ball but could Schlupp play the Kante role. Can drive forward with the ball, can tackle ( a little). Only concern is can he read the game well enough.

That ball's not curved.. It's warped! 

Posted

I think Shinji more likely in that role than Jeff, but both had occurred to me...

 

Note to the judges.....Mendy has not even played a single complete league match for us yet. We need patience, all of us.

Posted
2 minutes ago, HighPeakFox said:

I think Shinji more likely in that role than Jeff, but both had occurred to me...

 

Note to the judges.....Mendy has not even played a single complete league match for us yet. We need patience, all of us.

Depends on how badly injured he is.

Guest Col city fan
Posted
7 hours ago, Ric Flair said:

Which makes it all the more scandalous we aren't giving it big licks in the market to get another central midfielder in. If you're going to play 3 then you need at least 5 to manage you through the amount of games we've got coming up. We currently have 3 fit central midfielders. Very, very worrying. We rival Arsenal in the amount of time it takes to get transfers sorted as well so with 9 days left we're baffling.

This...

Posted
4 hours ago, AS78UK said:

Ok, curve ball but could Schlupp play the Kante role. Can drive forward with the ball, can tackle ( a little). Only concern is can he read the game well enough.

Please God, end our misery. Have mercy on us.

 

Posted
3 hours ago, weller54 said:

Perhaps... Hasn't really been given a chance yet. Ideally we shouldn't have to play either King or Amartey.. We need a quality signing in that area and fast! But respect your views. 

Respect yours too Weller !   And you're dead right about another quality signing in that area it is a must if we are to have another great season .:thumbup:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...