RoboFox Posted 14 December 2018 Posted 14 December 2018 16 minutes ago, Finnegan said: I've had two warning points sat on my account for years, one is for abusing the mods (kokopops) and the other is for "frivolous hooting." I really don't think you need to worry too much about them. Nice one, Finners. I was just curious.
lifted*fox Posted 15 December 2018 Posted 15 December 2018 i get my bans and warning points stuffed and display them like trophies
stripeyfox Posted 15 December 2018 Posted 15 December 2018 21 hours ago, RoboFox said: Real talk, though... What are Warning Points on my profile and what consequences do they have? (Because I'm the nicest guy on the forum I haven't had a reason to find out.) Once you get to five warning points, FT crack troops will rappel down from your roof, throw stun grenades in your front room and kidnap you. You will be assigned a new identity and will only be able to log in, and post on, Spurs forum "FightingCocks"
Max Wall Posted 15 December 2018 Posted 15 December 2018 Recently, I've seen a poster directly call another poster a ***t on here and it was left up. I just jokingly replied to a poster that I liked his spelling of Fullam and I was going to adopt it, my post was immediately removed. This is a genuine enquiry and not meant to be annoying for mods or stir up any trouble, what exactly is allowed on this site so I'm aware of how to keep within the 'guidelines'. Edit - There's actually a whole page on here where a poster gets the piss taken out of them for 'Chrystal Palace'. It's just a little confusing, that's all.
Nick Posted 15 December 2018 Posted 15 December 2018 13 minutes ago, Max Wall said: Recently, I've seen a poster directly call another poster a ***t on here and it was left up. I just jokingly replied to a poster that I liked his spelling of Fullam and I was going to adopt it, my post was immediately removed. This is a genuine enquiry and not meant to be annoying for mods or stir up any trouble, what exactly is allowed on this site so I'm aware of how to keep within the 'guidelines'.
Max Wall Posted 15 December 2018 Posted 15 December 2018 Just now, Swan Lesta said: Ah, one of the ring replies? I was hoping for a mod tbh.
Nick Posted 15 December 2018 Posted 15 December 2018 8 minutes ago, Max Wall said: Ah, one of the ring replies? I was hoping for a mod tbh. It's not a ring. Everybody knows it's an inner circle. The initiations however can be awful - just sayin.
Max Wall Posted 15 December 2018 Posted 15 December 2018 Just now, Swan Lesta said: It's not a ring. Everybody knows it's an inner circle. The initiations however can be awful - just sayin. It'll always be a ring to me Nick
Brainy Posted 15 December 2018 Posted 15 December 2018 I'm concerned that I have 1 warning point for "abusing an ITK", (Max this might explain the twat post was kept, ITK's are above everybody else), and 0 warning points for something with no title or explanation, which gives me a grand total of 4 warning points.
Wymsey Posted 15 December 2018 Posted 15 December 2018 Only had one warning point during my presence on here. Had kindly asked a moderator for this to be removed as, at the time, it was a few years since the temlorary ban was imposed.
davieG Posted 15 December 2018 Posted 15 December 2018 56 minutes ago, Max Wall said: Recently, I've seen a poster directly call another poster a ***t on here and it was left up. I just jokingly replied to a poster that I liked his spelling of Fullam and I was going to adopt it, my post was immediately removed. This is a genuine enquiry and not meant to be annoying for mods or stir up any trouble, what exactly is allowed on this site so I'm aware of how to keep within the 'guidelines'. Edit - There's actually a whole page on here where a poster gets the piss taken out of them for 'Chrystal Palace'. It's just a little confusing, that's all. I think it just reflects the differing views of the mods as the whole thing is so subjective plus you have to recognise that it’s not always a one off, an individual may have posted more than one iffy post or may have a history. Then you have not all the mods are online all the time or even read all the posts. Think of us like referees with even less specific guidelines and that’s why it’s so inconsistent. Doesnt solve it for you but I hope it helps to understand the problem.
Brainy Posted 15 December 2018 Posted 15 December 2018 Pretty sure I read somewhere that abuse is not tolerated. I don't understand how two mods can see somebody call another poster a ***t and and have differing opinions on it
davieG Posted 15 December 2018 Posted 15 December 2018 1 hour ago, Walkers said: Pretty sure I read somewhere that abuse is not tolerated. I don't understand how two mods can see somebody call another poster a ***t and and have differing opinions on it Well it is possible that no mod even saw it we can't read every post so unless someone reported it it will go unnoticed.
Nick Posted 15 December 2018 Posted 15 December 2018 1 hour ago, Walkers said: Pretty sure I read somewhere that abuse is not tolerated. I don't understand how two mods can see somebody call another poster a ***t and and have differing opinions on it Context.
Brainy Posted 15 December 2018 Posted 15 December 2018 1 hour ago, Swan Lesta said: Context. Sure, but i'm just taking what I said from Max Wall presuming that his example was one of genuine abuse. I would assume he wouldn't have used it as an example if it wasn't serious.
Countryfox Posted 15 December 2018 Posted 15 December 2018 On 14/12/2018 at 16:31, Finnegan said: and the other is for "frivolous hooting." What the fooks that when it’s at home !! ...
DB11 Posted 17 December 2018 Posted 17 December 2018 On 15/12/2018 at 13:57, Walkers said: I'm concerned that I have 1 warning point for "abusing an ITK", (Max this might explain the twat post was kept, ITK's are above everybody else), and 0 warning points for something with no title or explanation, which gives me a grand total of 4 warning points. The 'moderator note' for the other one states it was for accusing another member of being a paedophile
Brainy Posted 17 December 2018 Posted 17 December 2018 3 hours ago, DB11 said: The 'moderator note' for the other one states it was for accusing another member of being a paedophile I got more warning points for abusing an ITK
ScouseFox Posted 17 December 2018 Posted 17 December 2018 3 hours ago, DB11 said: The 'moderator note' for the other one states it was for accusing another member of being a paedophile this is the greatest post in forum history, fair play
Guest Posted 13 January 2019 Posted 13 January 2019 I started a thread this morning called "The Nottingham Forest Syndrome" a reasoned argument concerning the change of fans attitude at clubs who get a big success. It seemed to interest people - there was no nastiness and no Puel out discussion. It then disappeared. Could someone - preferably the person who removed it - let me know why it was removed? Really strange when we have so many of the same Puel out threads being opened multiple times everyday which stay open without even being amalgamated. Is there a mod with a hard on for me? and Swanny you're still on ignore so no need to reply
Countryfox Posted 13 January 2019 Posted 13 January 2019 5 hours ago, FIF said: I started a thread this morning called "The Nottingham Forest Syndrome" a reasoned argument concerning the change of fans attitude at clubs who get a big success. It seemed to interest people - there was no nastiness and no Puel out discussion. It then disappeared. Could someone - preferably the person who removed it - let me know why it was removed? Really strange when we have so many of the same Puel out threads being opened multiple times everyday which stay open without even being amalgamated. Is there a mod with a hard on for me? and Swanny you're still on ignore so no need to reply Easy prof ... it had NOTTINGHAM FVCKIN FOREST in the title ...
Guest Posted 18 January 2019 Posted 18 January 2019 I wish the mods would ignore those posts of mine they don't like as easily as they ignore my questions.
The People's Hero Posted 18 January 2019 Posted 18 January 2019 On 15/12/2018 at 13:16, Max Wall said: Recently, I've seen a poster directly call another poster a ***t on here and it was left up. I just jokingly replied to a poster that I liked his spelling of Fullam and I was going to adopt it, my post was immediately removed. This is a genuine enquiry and not meant to be annoying for mods or stir up any trouble, what exactly is allowed on this site so I'm aware of how to keep within the 'guidelines'. Edit - There's actually a whole page on here where a poster gets the piss taken out of them for 'Chrystal Palace'. It's just a little confusing, that's all. I've had loads of warnings, usually for making excellent and constructive points but too many times (since the dullards just can't understand it). I've reported loads of people for using unacceptable language and I don't believe anything has ever been done. All depends on whether or not you're a mod's pet or one of the good guys. Just remember - to live outside the law you must be honest... and you won't go too far wrong. And warning don't really do anything. Just don't disagree too often with any of the shnerbs that suck up to the mod team, otherwise you'll get a ban.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.