Tin Foil Hat Conspiracy Thread

[Ky Le Don]

1 hour ago, Trumpet said:

Has anyone heard of The Gateway Tapes? I’m posting here as the CIA allegedly looked into it and of course, looking into that kind of thing can lead you down various rabbit holes. 
 

Anyway, interested to know if anyone else has given them a go and how they got on. Myself, I’ve got to a point where I can get into Focus 10 (completed what’s known as the first tape). For anyone that doesn’t know what it is, it’s essentially guided meditation with binaural beats. Focus 10 is described as mind awake, body asleep. My experience of Focus 10 is complete calmness - I’m aware that I have control over my body should I want to move, but I’m completely relaxed and can’t feel my body. Usually when I’m awake and fully alert I’ll always be moving, even if I’m not aware - I’ll have urges to scratch an itch or similar but not in Focus 10. It’s as though my body is completely asleep.

Yep mind awake body asleep. I've done it twice one time intentional where I could see 360 around my room and feeling like I'm at the ceiling, whilst my body is still in bed. The other time wasn't feeling very well and popped out.

 

I've read all the Monroe books. Truly fascinating. 

 

Lucid dreaming, AP, OBE. Hard to have these kind of conversations with the average person though.

Edited 25 March by Ky Le Don

[Trumpet]

19 hours ago, Ky Le Don said:

Yep mind awake body asleep. I've done it twice one time intentional where I could see 360 around my room and feeling like I'm at the ceiling, whilst my body is still in bed. The other time wasn't feeling very well and popped out.

 

I've read all the Monroe books. Truly fascinating. 

 

Lucid dreaming, AP, OBE. Hard to have these kind of conversations with the average person though.

This is part of the reason I posted it in here as most would think it’s a bit out there. But there’s something there and it works for me.

 

I haven’t quite mastered focus 15 yet, but I do feel a difference between it and focus 10. I really like focus 10 though. It helps before sleep to wind down I find.

[SecretPro]

Clearly something big is about to come out about Epstein and Mrs Trump. What will it be? 

[Trav Le Bleu]

45 minutes ago, SecretPro said:

Clearly something big is about to come out about Epstein and Mrs Trump. What will it be? 

Interesting how she struggled to read her own denial.

[Trumpet]

I think Trump is being blackmailed with the Epstein files.

[Zear0]

8 hours ago, Trav Le Bleu said:

Interesting how she struggled to read her own denial.

Surprised about that as I’d assumed her and her husband were intellectuals who read often

[leicsmac]

8 minutes ago, Zear0 said:

Surprised about that as I’d assumed her and her husband were intellectuals who read often

Well, Karoline Leavitt said as much so...

[Trav Le Bleu]

Methinks the lady doth protest too much.

[Zear0]

Wild story. Did NATO hit it? Did Russia sink it after incapacitated? Did they blow up the evidence?

[st albans fox]

40 minutes ago, Zear0 said:

Wild story. Did NATO hit it? Did Russia sink it after incapacitated? Did they blow up the evidence?

Not convinced of the n Korea angle 

surely you’d have an option to move stuff by road or rail to Vladivostok (maybe waiting till spring because of the weather )

secondly, a shipment of that sensitivity - why send through the med when that means having to transit through the Suez Canal and bab el Mandab (which was at that time full western navy’s and risk of attack from houthis with operation prosperity guardian ongoing). 

 

you’d surely send on the longer transit around the cape. 
 

if it was for Iran or n Korea then I’m amazed they’d send it through the med.  
 

 

[Jaspa]

 

[Grebfromgrebland]

After the Epstein files this is entirely plausible and most likely mostly true.

 

The pedophilia in the royal family must go back generations and be part of normal life for them and their ilk.

 

It's no coincidence that Andrew was besties with Epstein and Charles with saville.

[SpacedX]

10 hours ago, Jaspa said:

 

I wouldn't have thought it possible that after posting the utterly ludicrous "American Moon" you could find something equally absurd. Congratulations. 

[st albans fox]

13 hours ago, Grebfromgrebland said:

After the Epstein files this is entirely plausible and most likely mostly true.

 

The pedophilia in the royal family must go back generations and be part of normal life for them and their ilk.

 

It's no coincidence that Andrew was besties with Epstein and Charles with saville.

‘Most likely true’ ….

so you don’t think that evil people make a bee line for those that society considers to be the most reputable in order to protect themselves???

[Jaspa]

2 hours ago, SpacedX said:

I wouldn't have thought it possible that after posting the utterly ludicrous "American Moon" you could find something equally absurd. Congratulations. 

Blimey that was about 7 years ago or something. The Savile one is more entertainment than anything else, it's a classic conspiracy theory homemade YouTube documentary. 

 

Best moment is when it calls Leeds a literal esoteric portal to hell. Brings in a few secret society mentions, Peter Sutcliffe gets a mention. Savile's cigar being a wizard wand. Buried like a vampire. Someone took time to compile this thing and gave it their own unique thought. 

 

Suppose with the moon one you could see it as a guide to the arguments you'll face when encountering someone who thinks the moon landing was faked... or at least had to be reproduced on a movie set. People don't necessarily believe all of this stuff, they just like to ask questions of what they're being told; sometimes they're right, most of the time not.

[SpacedX]

42 minutes ago, Jaspa said:

Best moment is when it calls Leeds a literal esoteric portal to hell. 

 

46 minutes ago, Jaspa said:

Someone took time to compile this thing and gave it their own unique thought. 

 

 

You mean they made up a complete load of bollocks.

 

43 minutes ago, Jaspa said:

Suppose with the moon one you could see it as a guide to the arguments you'll face when encountering someone who thinks the moon landing was faked... or at least had to be reproduced on a movie set. People don't necessarily believe all of this stuff, they just like to ask questions of what they're being told; sometimes they're right, most of the time not.

Except they aren't asking questions because none of them are remotely interested in hearing the answers. And in the case of moon landing conspiracy theory believers, and the grifters that tell them what to think, such as Bart Sibrel and the frankly vile, Massimo Mazzucco, they are never right. 

 

Problem with populist conspiracy theories is that contrary to what their adherents may claim, they don't promote independent or critical thinking and simply thrive upon gullibility and suggestibility. They are also sold to those that have zero knowledge or understanding of the subject in question whatsoever and inevitably lead to increasingly wild and fantastical interpretations of the world around them. It's rare to encounter a so called "9/11 truther" that doesn't also believe in chemtrails, fake moon landings, or anti-vax. 

[Trav Le Bleu]

I wish someone would seed some rain clouds.

[SpacedX]

10 minutes ago, Trav Le Bleu said:

I wish someone would seed some rain clouds.

Cloud seeding is actually a reality although it is of questionable efficacy. Chemtrail believers lump this in with a hypothetical area of geoengineering called Stratospheric Aerosol Injection to explain the aircraft contrails that they don't understand. 

 

Remember though, you can only "seed" existing clouds, conducive to rainfall, it does not create them. 

 

There was a BBC programme, a Top Gear spin off called 'Extreme Machines' I think, in which host Jeremy Clarkson visited an R-68 rocket test at John C. Stennis Space Center in Mississippi. He then said that in about an hour “someone in Mississippi is going to get wet.” The video then shows Clarkson in the rain. “NASA is playing god,” Clarkson says. “It’s making its own weather.” But of course NASA never intended to create rain. The engines run on liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen propellants, which create a steam cloud when mixed together in the combustion chamber and ignited. When the steam cloud cools, it turns into water and can create rain depending on the temperature and humidity at the time of the test. This localised rainfall is a purely accidental byproduct of the engineering required to test specific types of heavy rocket engines, rather than an intentional weather-control system. Hilariously this has been appropriated by largely American conspiracy theorists, quote mined and selectively edited with all context removed and deceptively titled to suggest NASA has constructed rain making machines and can control the weather. 

[Trav Le Bleu]

4 hours ago, SpacedX said:

Remember though, you can only "seed" existing clouds, conducive to rainfall, it does not create them

Well duh!

[bovril]

'Leicester City' is not a football club but a longitudinal psychological study from the University of California. The researchers are interested particularly in the extent to which participants will remain loyal to an authority figure who, after initially building trust and rapport through rewards, subjects the participants to increasingly severe psychological punishment.