LCFC Supporter Bans.

[Sol thewall Bamba]

6 minutes ago, Claridge said:

seems to be what’s happening on here with regards to the club. people commenting without all of the facts

A bit like the club issuing bans then. 

[bmt]

26 minutes ago, jammie82uk said:

I agree and I don’t think no one will debate that, but that’s not the issue, the issue is the club banning people based on nothing more then a probability 

At best. At worst, they are using an incident to ban people they want to ban regardless of involvement. Lack of transparency/accountability means that you can't rule that out, unfortunately.

[Danno]

27 minutes ago, grobyfox1990 said:

Who is 'Dan' who broke the internet with his Twitter post, on this forum? Very eloquent post following a clear and logical timeline, not some emotional and garbled 'shambles mate clubs gone' type post. Well done, we need more Dan's. 

@Dan

[elangLCFC]

1 hour ago, jammie82uk said:

I agree and I don’t think no one will debate that, but that’s not the issue, the issue is the club banning people based on nothing more then a probability 

I’m not saying it’s right, but to be fair outside of criminal court, all disputes are settled on the balance of probabilities

[Claudio Fannieri]

Another absolute PR own goal clusterfcuk from the people who run this club, every day there is another bit of news that leaves you shaking your head at just how disconnected and fragmented this club has become from its fanbase, as others have said we are no longer fans, this is no longer our club, we are customers and that is it. 
 

such a sad sorry state of affairs but remember be careful what you wish for …….

[Lionator]

The people defending the bans on here are embarrassing themselves. You can’t ban people based on vibes and if it went to a civil lawsuit it would likely be overturned but people aren’t in the financial position to take a premier league football club to court. If someone did something genuinely dangerous then the police would deal with it and once it got to that point, bans would justifiably be handed out. Quite frankly, if the police aren’t interested then neither should the club be but hey ho. 

[Pita]

Looks like the club are trying to drive away supporters. When the need to encourage more to get out of the financial mess they have got us into. 

[blueharmie]

The ban backers are king power fans.

 

Unfortunately due to the fanbase which has become sedentary, no protest from our fans will get rid of the incompetent board 

 

Took the idiots years to get rid of Rodgers.

 

Clubs a mess.

[Denzel the fox]

25 minutes ago, Lionator said:

The people defending the bans on here are embarrassing themselves. You can’t ban people based on vibes and if it went to a civil lawsuit it would likely be overturned but people aren’t in the financial position to take a premier league football club to court. If someone did something genuinely dangerous then the police would deal with it and once it got to that point, bans would justifiably be handed out. Quite frankly, if the police aren’t interested then neither should the club be but hey ho. 

Totally agree. I’m aware of a ban handed down to a young lad who picked a pyro up after it had been thrown, literally landed at his feet and he picked it up for a few seconds, didn’t waive it around or anything and then dropped it all of which was on film. yes maybe naive and stupid to pick up but the police accepted he hadn’t brought it into the ground or set it off and didn’t see any reason to proceed , not only did the club ban him but they pushed the police to take action, which thankfully they didn’t do. 

[Skidmark]

I somehow sadly think that the greatest protest we could do is turn out back on King Power FC and decide to do something better with our time. 

 

I feel like this because of the way in which we fans have been treated over the years. 

 

We were once the envy of every football club, with an owner who treated us fans with respect and acknowledged our commitment. Now we're bled dry with ridiculous policies such as £25 for season ticket cards and our voices are not wanted, listened to or valued in any way. 

 

I feel that the time for myself will come very soon in which I turn my back on my club once and for all.

 

A great shame really as watching us play has helped me out with taking my mind off depression, troubles in life and allowed me to get back in touch with some good friends. 

[Lesterlad]

19 hours ago, Jackubu said:

Saw his FB post. Would be very surprised if he's done anything actually wrong. Poor bloke 

Not the fact that a person on Facebook moaning etc uses the C word constantly at games especially when drunk which is every game. Some fans are fed up with listening to the abuse that comes out of his mouth. Even if it’s meant in good nature. I don’t know him only hear him. And no I didn’t report him and wasn’t at the Everton game 

[Lionator]

15 minutes ago, Denzel the fox said:

Totally agree. I’m aware of a ban handed down to a young lad who picked a pyro up after it had been thrown, literally landed at his feet and he picked it up for a few seconds, didn’t waive it around or anything and then dropped it all of which was on film. yes maybe naive and stupid to pick up but the police accepted he hadn’t brought it into the ground or set it off and didn’t see any reason to proceed , not only did the club ban him but they pushed the police to take action, which thankfully they didn’t do. 

Policing in football has come a long way in the past few years, for the most part they interact with fans, treat them as humans rather than cattle that must be contained and only really respond when absolutely necessary (again for the most part). Yet what we’re seeing from the club completely goes against this ethos. Do they know how stupid they look when the police are the sensible voice in the room?

[Tommy G]

3 hours ago, iancognito said:

No, we're not. They're not selling us a product, or providing a service. They are running a club and providing entertainment through the players on the pitch. We're stakeholders in that club through our season tickets and memberships. We've been supporters/stakeholders for decades longer than the faceless suits running it. The club belongs to all of us through that, we're far more than customers.

We are paying money in return for entertainment (questionable ) a bit like the cinema. 

 

We are supporters and stakeholders - but they club doesn't belong to us as much as I recognise the sentiment in your post.  

[Jackubu]

32 minutes ago, Lesterlad said:

Not the fact that a person on Facebook moaning etc uses the C word constantly at games especially when drunk which is every game. Some fans are fed up with listening to the abuse that comes out of his mouth. Even if it’s meant in good nature. I don’t know him only hear him. And no I didn’t report him and wasn’t at the Everton game 

Man drinks at football and uses expletives = ban. 

 

Cool 👍

[Sol thewall Bamba]

59 minutes ago, Denzel the fox said:

Totally agree. I’m aware of a ban handed down to a young lad who picked a pyro up after it had been thrown, literally landed at his feet and he picked it up for a few seconds, didn’t waive it around or anything and then dropped it all of which was on film. yes maybe naive and stupid to pick up but the police accepted he hadn’t brought it into the ground or set it off and didn’t see any reason to proceed , not only did the club ban him but they pushed the police to take action, which thankfully they didn’t do. 

This is the most disgusting bit of all of this. A private organisation pushing for prosecutions. The Police didn't want to know about what happened at Selhurst, which given the fact that they're paid for handing out FBOs, tells you what you need to know.  

[Stadt]

1 hour ago, Denzel the fox said:

not only did the club ban him but they pushed the police to take action, which thankfully they didn’t do. 

This is why we're consistently up there with the most FBOs, the club are so keen to turn minor infractions into bigger ones by handing over fans to the police when warning would do.

[Sir Steve Howard]

1 hour ago, Lesterlad said:

Not the fact that a person on Facebook moaning etc uses the C word constantly at games especially when drunk which is every game. Some fans are fed up with listening to the abuse that comes out of his mouth. Even if it’s meant in good nature. I don’t know him only hear him. And no I didn’t report him and wasn’t at the Everton game 

C word appropriate for you

[Lesterlad]

15 minutes ago, Sir Steve Howard said:

C word appropriate for you

And why is that?

[Lesterlad]

49 minutes ago, Jackubu said:

Man drinks at football and uses expletives = ban. 

 

Cool 👍

No I didnt say that at all and wasn’t accusing anyone by name. Just the person I am thinking off abuses lots of people men and women city and away fans 

[Trekerz]

15 minutes ago, Lesterlad said:

No I didnt say that at all and wasn’t accusing anyone by name. Just the person I am thinking off abuses lots of people men and women city and away fans 

Think you’re better suited at Tigers rather than the football 

[Lesterlad]

6 minutes ago, Trekerz said:

Think you’re better suited at Tigers rather than the football 

[Jackubu]

30 minutes ago, Lesterlad said:

No I didnt say that at all and wasn’t accusing anyone by name. Just the person I am thinking off abuses lots of people men and women city and away fans 

😂😂 Of course 

[Sir Steve Howard]

34 minutes ago, Lesterlad said:

And why is that?

Football is not for you, get a grip

[ajthefox]

Do we think we could manage to get Rudkin and Suzy bans if we dressed up as them and did something daft? 

[VLC86]

1 hour ago, Jackubu said:

Man drinks at football and uses expletives = ban. 

 

Cool 👍

I was deliberately not logging onto here for one reason or another but have logged back in to say that I know who they are talking about and trust me, I’ve seen him do stuff that warrants a ban.

 

That said, I do think the club have clearly been waiting to jump on something for him and many others because they want a certain type of supporter.