Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

It’s crazy that we’ve got someone who’s figures are 2 for 7 from 2 overs, but we’re chucking the game away bowling Walker and Salisbury. Kimber is infuriating!

Edited by RizLCFC
Posted

I don't like being critical, but with the quality at our disposal, we need to be greater than the sum of our parts and Kimber's captaincy currently isn't enabling that. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Bert said:

Ridiculous to not be able to defend 196

Very small boundary. As @Staff said, we were short. There was way too much leg side bowling but think that was from the bowlers trying to divert it away from the small boundary. I don’t think anyone has defended anything under 200 at Edgbaston so far this season in the Blast.

 

To a man (except for Scriven) Derbyshire were just better all round.

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
Just now, Blueman1967 said:

Tomorrow game need to get back to winning ways, is Hull not available? try Wood or Green!

Green’s back at Somerset for the blast 

Posted
2 hours ago, Staff said:

Not sure how players like Salisbury and walker even get a game, feckin useless 

Yeah they're depth options who will give you a good performance every half dozen games and be poor to average the rest of the time.

 

Disappointing we're having to play both in every game, swap in Hull and Mike and you've got two much more dangerous options. Though Mike is due his bad t20 season. Economy rate by year:

 

24: 9.3

23: 11.6

22: 8.97

21: 12.5

20: 6.9

19: 12.3

Posted
11 hours ago, DezFox said:

I wonder if we tried to sign Patel, he would a be a great captain in this t20 side and from Leicester. I would imagine we probably did. 

No love lost between Patel and the club so doubt it

Posted

Looks like Ben Mike is back in the squad... looking forward to some tight, controlled, miserly bowling 🤞🙂.

Anyone know why Chris Wright doesn't seem to be an option for the Blast? I'd take four overs of nagging line and length over anything else right now, especially after yesterday.

Rishi P. really needs a score too.

Posted
1 hour ago, Zorrovolpe said:

Looks like Ben Mike is back in the squad... looking forward to some tight, controlled, miserly bowling 🤞🙂.

Anyone know why Chris Wright doesn't seem to be an option for the Blast? I'd take four overs of nagging line and length over anything else right now, especially after yesterday.

Rishi P. really needs a score too.

It was because of his age and saving him for the CCC, but given he hasn’t played that much, I’d had the same thought as you and that he’d be worth a go. I think he told Richard Rae he’d play T20 if asked a couple of years ago in an interview and I’d be surprised if he’s changed his mind since then.

  • Like 1
Posted

Would be great to see Mike back in today for Walker, as well as him being fairly handy with the bat. 
 

Feel like today is already a must win. 

  • Like 4
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Bert said:

Would be great to see Mike back in today for Walker, as well as him being fairly handy with the bat. 
 

Feel like today is already a must win. 

Need to stop the rot. As someone said last week, though, I'm not sure we've got a great T20 side. We bat deep but I'm not sure we have enough batters who are both quick scoring and consistent in the top 6, whilst the bowling, with the likes of Walker and Salisbury having to play, is sub-standard really. Holland, Ben Green and Hull are big misses.

Edited by Sunbury Fox
Posted (edited)

Feels like such an obvious Cricket Dad thing to say, but we should be hitting the top of off more. Worcestershire have been great against anything angled into them.

Edited by Voll Blau

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...