davieG Posted 26 November 2007 Author Posted 26 November 2007 Playing with just one striker in your first home game, which happens to be a near sell-out, with the expectation upped after saturday, would be suicide for Holloway even if it meant throwing in an inexperienced kid. Stearman to start up front
Aeropars Posted 26 November 2007 Posted 26 November 2007 Dont suppose if anyone knows about the outcome of the fryatt appeal do they?
dandannieldanok Posted 26 November 2007 Posted 26 November 2007 We ahve no strikers to play tonight who's going to play?hume,cort,dj,de vries,john are all out only leaves with sapleton and hammond? who do you think he'll play? Is Hume out? And Hammond is definitely out injured. Stearman to start up front Wouldn't surprise me, he has played in nearly every other position in his LCFC career.
potter3 Posted 26 November 2007 Posted 26 November 2007 Playing with just one striker in your first home game, which happens to be a near sell-out, with the expectation upped after saturday, would be suicide for Holloway even if it meant throwing in an inexperienced kid. Putting a youngster in would increase his popularity anyway prbabaly.
Fez of Mahrez Posted 26 November 2007 Posted 26 November 2007 All this talk of Sappleton starting is ridiculous. There is no way that Holloway is going to give a start to a player who's not played any 1st team football this season and didn't even make the bench at Bristol City at the weekend.Holloway will, in all probability, play Hume up top on his own and possibly have 2 of Odihambo, Sappleton, Elvis and Ashley Chambers on the bench. I don't think you have done your research on Holloway if you think he'll play 4-5-1 instead of blooding a youngster up front. It's 4-4-2 all the way. We have experience in central midfield and on the right wing if Newton plays. Hume is young but experienced enough. If Fryatt doesn't play then it'll be a kid up front with Hume.
Mikey Posted 26 November 2007 Posted 26 November 2007 Nah, it's gonna be Kenton up front of course. Mr Versatile
MPH Posted 26 November 2007 Posted 26 November 2007 Fryatt or No Fryatt that is the question?According to Wikpedia: Many football leagues and federations have off-field penalties for players who accumulate a certain number of cautions in a season, tournament or phase of a tournament. Typically these take the form of a suspension from playing in their team's next game after that number of cautions has been reached (two in international tournaments and five in a league season). Such off-field penalties are determined by league rules, and not by the Laws of the Game. Similarly, a send-off usually also results in additional sanctions, most commonly in the form of suspensions from playing for a number of future games, although financial fines may also be imposed. The exact punishments are determined by tournament or competition rules, and not by the Laws of the Game. FIFA in particular has been adamant that a red card in any football competition must result in the guilty player being suspended for at least the next game without the right to appeal. The Football Association However, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Football_Association" title="The Football Association">English Football Association has somewhat defied FIFA with respect to appeals. As of 2006 in England, if a direct red card is shown the player is dismissed from the field immediately and normally faces a three-match ban, which exceeds the FIFA minimum and applies to both League and Cup competitions. FIFA does not normally require a red-carded player in a domestic league match to sit out the national cup or international competition (such as the UEFA Champions League); his ban is to be served in the next league match. However, bans can be overturned with a successful appeal for wrongful dismissal. The onus is on the player to prove his case and the ban can be extended if the FA deems the appeal to be frivolous. As such, most clubs will not appeal unless they are certain that they have a good case. Appeals must be made within a day or two of the match, and a decision will always be reached prior to the club's next scheduled match. In the case of a red card that was shown after two yellow cards, the player is dismissed and receives a one-match ban without the right to appeal, excluding mistaken identity. The FA's appeals policy is generally seen as quite restrictive and only a small percentage of red cards are ever overturned. However, it should be noted that until the current policy was enacted during the early 2000s, the FA's disciplinary policy was somewhat more lenient, and three-match bans sometimes did not take effect until as late as two weeks after the red card was issued. Nonetheless, successful red card appeals have become a constant source of friction between the FA and FIFA. FIFA President Sepp Blatter has occasionally mooted suspending the FA from FIFA and barring England from international tournaments for its continued defiance of FIFA directives, but as of 2006 had taken no further action. The use of video replay has also been a point of contention with regards to its actual or potential use for both red card appeals and retroactive yellow or red cards for diving. Trials for this technology (Hawk-Eye) commenced in England in 2007, and the Football Association has declared the system as "ready for inspection by FIFA".[1] i think fryatt might of pulled a swift one... to miss a game 2 days later when he might of been too tired for it anyway is what i find intresting...
potter3 Posted 26 November 2007 Posted 26 November 2007 i think fryatt might of pulled a swift one... to miss a game 2 days later when he might of been too tired for it anyway is what i find intresting... Yeah but he's going to be banned for 2-3 games
Monk Posted 26 November 2007 Posted 26 November 2007 Evening all. I am messaging from sunny Nicaragua, so won't be on here long today as its 35 degrees outside hahaha. What a difference a week makes. Pleased with the appointment and the result on saturday. Hope we can win this evening.... am interested to see what the team is when it comes out...
Free Falling Foxes Posted 26 November 2007 Posted 26 November 2007 I thought the kick-off time was 8 o'clock (Mercury & LCFCWORLD) Radio times says 7:45! Who's right? I don't want to get there too early and freeze my parts off. FFF
Dames Posted 26 November 2007 Posted 26 November 2007 If Newton starts tonight i'm leaving early. I really hate the bloke.
Lillehamring Posted 26 November 2007 Posted 26 November 2007 I don't think you have done your research on Holloway if you think he'll play 4-5-1 instead of blooding a youngster up front. It's 4-4-2 all the way. We have experience in central midfield and on the right wing if Newton plays. Hume is young but experienced enough. If Fryatt doesn't play then it'll be a kid up front with Hume. makes sense... & what better time for a young lad to play, when confidence is high, at a near sold out walkers? tho i think he'll have kenton @ right back & keep stears @ right mid
MPH Posted 26 November 2007 Posted 26 November 2007 makes sense... & what better time for a young lad to play, when confidence is high, at a near sold out walkers?tho i think he'll have kenton @ right back & keep stears @ right mid seems like the best chance Kaebi has to play.... but if he plays stearman at RM instead of Kaebi then i dont blame the guy if he wants to bugger off!
ronnup Posted 26 November 2007 Posted 26 November 2007 Is Dudley Fit? i'd love to see Sapplezilla in.
Cheese Me Posted 26 November 2007 Posted 26 November 2007 Team to start: Fulop Stearman, Kisnorbo, McCauley, Mattock Newton, Clem, Weso, Sheehan Hume, Fryatt Not a bad looking team all things considered. Newton wouldn't have been my first choice but he's due a good game Come on City!
MPH Posted 26 November 2007 Posted 26 November 2007 Team to start:Fulop Stearman, Kisnorbo, McCauley, Mattock Newton, Clem, Weso, Sheehan Hume, Fryatt Not a bad looking team all things considered. Newton wouldn't have been my first choice but he's due a good game Come on City! team isnt on OS site! who are the subs?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.