davieG Posted 28 February 2008 Posted 28 February 2008 From the Merc: GUILTY PLEA TO SEX ACTS WITH DOGS 10:30 - 28 February 2008 A son was so sickened to discover his father had committed sex acts with dogs that he reported him to the police. Paul William Langton filmed himself carrying out what a judge described as "disgusting" behaviour with a black Labrador and a brown mongrel. His adult son saw the video by chance and, after a row with his dad a few years later, went to a police station. Langton, a married 51-year-old lorry driver from Beaumont Leys, hung his head in shame and covered his face behind his hand as he appeared in the dock at Leicester Crown Court. He pleaded guilty to serious sex acts with three male dogs, between 1974 and 2004. Barbara Graham, prosecuting, said: "The offences came to light after the police were alerted to the fact there may be illegal material, and a warrant was executed on November 2, 2006. She said: "There were disturbing video images explicitly showing, and suggestive of, sexual acts with dogs." Ms Graham said Langton initially admitted filming himself with the dog on one occasion. She said: "It became clear from the evidence there were two dogs directly involved in sexual activity with Langton." He then confessed to having sexual activity with a third dog, a border collie. He told police he had "allowed the dogs to have sex with him" and been involved in other acts. In interview, Langton said it had happened so long ago he had tried to blank it out of his mind because he knew it was wrong. Ms Graham said to the judge: "I am told Your Honour does not feel obliged to watch the (video) clips - I fully understand." Judge Michael Pert, QC, said that although the offences were "disgusting" it did not mean, according to sentencing guidelines, they automatically qualified for a jail sentence. The case was adjourned for a pre-sentence report, to address non-custodial options and possible treatment programmes. Langton was remanded into custody to await sentencing next month.
filbertway Posted 28 February 2008 Posted 28 February 2008 Please don't tell me I'm the only one who laughed I didn't read past the first 3 lines but lol PS.. I feel sorry for teh dog(s) in question, bet it/they didn't walk for a while after.
Daggers Posted 28 February 2008 Posted 28 February 2008 Blimey! He must be barking mad! There again, I'll be betting his wife was dog-rough. Still, at least the court appearance will have given him paws for thought.
Zingari Posted 28 February 2008 Posted 28 February 2008 so what he likes a bit of black and brown action
Flynny Posted 28 February 2008 Posted 28 February 2008 Blimey! He must be barking mad! There again, I'll be betting his wife was dog-rough. Still, at least the court appearance will have given him paws for thought. I'm suprised they released his name. He'll be hounded for the rest of his life. Glad he was collared eventually though.
Simi Posted 28 February 2008 Posted 28 February 2008 I bet he walked away with his tail between his legs.
Daggers Posted 28 February 2008 Posted 28 February 2008 One assumes that he will have to gnaw his own bone from now on.
davieG Posted 28 February 2008 Author Posted 28 February 2008 When they told him he was nicked re yelped you're barking up the wrong tree guv!
Head Honcho Posted 28 February 2008 Posted 28 February 2008 All it took was a few leads from the police that led to him being collared
Fez of Mahrez Posted 28 February 2008 Posted 28 February 2008 When they told him he was nicked re yelped you're barking up the wrong tree guv! Too late now. That's all ifs, buts and rabies.
filbertway Posted 28 February 2008 Posted 28 February 2008 Lipstick JME I think we both know who the real dog lover is.
lildave3 Posted 28 February 2008 Posted 28 February 2008 LipstickJME I think we both know who the real dog lover is. Lipstick Licking?
Simi Posted 28 February 2008 Posted 28 February 2008 I guess the term 'doggy style' has a completely different meaning now. Poor kid, going to be hard for him to pull a Lassie now.
Zingari Posted 28 February 2008 Posted 28 February 2008 the judge said " this is disgusting , how low can you get ?" he replied "a dachshund" your honour
Samilktray Posted 28 February 2008 Posted 28 February 2008 Why didnt the judge watch the videos. Would of been high on my agenda if i was ever a judge in this sort of case.
Webbo Posted 28 February 2008 Posted 28 February 2008 the judge said " this is disgusting , how low can you get ?"he replied "a dachshund" your honour Seriously though, how do we know that the dogs didn't consent?
Monk Posted 29 February 2008 Posted 29 February 2008 I wouldn't want to be on the tail end of such a ruling.
Raj Posted 29 February 2008 Posted 29 February 2008 He told police he had "allowed the dogs to have sex with him" and been involved in other acts. :crylaugh: Dirty Cvnt!
SOCCERROO FOX Posted 29 February 2008 Posted 29 February 2008 He told police he had "allowed the dogs to have sex with him" and been involved in other acts. :crylaugh: Dirty Cvnt! So he consented to the dogs
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.