Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Stuliasz

Dag & Red Player Ratings

Recommended Posts

Posted

Martin 8

Edworthy, Tunchev, Morrison, Mattock, Dyer, King, Berner, Adams, Davies, Powell 5

Howard 8

Fryatt 10

Posted
Martin 8

Edworthy, Tunchev, Morrison, Mattock, King, Berner, Adams, Davies, Powell 5

Howard 8

Fryatt 10

That will do for me too apart from giving Howard 7.5. :thumbup:

The team couldn't be bothered much and neither can I.

Posted

Martin - 7. Uncertain in the first half, and tested far more than he should have been. Made important saves though.

Edworthy - 5. Lack of pace was exposed at times.

Tunchev - 5. As bad as I've seen him for us. Not his usual commanding self at all.

Morrison - 5. As lacklustre as those around him.

Mattock - 4. Badly exposed for the two goals conceded, and also went walkabout on other occasions.

Adams - 2. Looked way off the pace. His touch and crossing reminded me of Josh Low at his worst.

King - 4. Far more ego than effort. No goal to rescue his performance today.

Berner - 5. Very subdued, possibly unfit.

Dyer - 6. Some useful runs, not always with much end product though.

Fryatt - 9*. Quality hat-trick and could have had more. Carried the team on his own at times.

Howard - 3. Yet another p!sspoor performance against 4th div opposition. Nigel, get rid.

Powell - 5. Failed to bring stability to defence,

Davies - 6. Useful debut, made some important tackles.

Posted

Martin -7.5

Edworthy -6

Morrison -6

Tunchev -5

Mattock -5

Adams -5 - some of his touches were bad but atleast he was involved and you noticed he was playing, unlike anyone else in the midfield.

King -4

Berner -4

Dyer -5

Howard -7-

Fryatt -9

Davies -5

Powell -5

Posted

King - 4. Far more ego than effort. No goal to rescue his performance today.

Bu the BBC do credit him with an assist for our winner though! :D

I don't actually recall details of the build up so can't confirm it or otherwise.

Nor do I think it would have made his performance any better than a five.

However I can't see where the ego bit came into it. Perhaps you could explain?

Posted

Martin 8 made some excellent saves

Edworthy 5

Tunchev 5

Morrison 3

Mattock 5

Dyer 5

King 4

Berner 4

Adams.................. 0 Waste of time him being selected

Davies 5

Powell 5

Howard 8 - Good performance but needs to start scoring!

Fryatt 9

Posted
Howard - 3. Yet another p!sspoor performance against 4th div opposition. Nigel, get rid.

Ultra, I'm not having a go but I'm intrigued as to how you can rate him 3 whereas everyone else so far has given him at least 7. Yes there are different opinions and everyone is entitled to their own but could you briefly explain for the benefit of those that didn't see the game (or saw it through some blurred internet stream while actually watching Wales in the rugby) why you thought he was so bad?

Posted

Martin - 6

Edworthy - 5

Tunchev - 6

Morrison - 6

Mattock - 5

Adams - 4

King - 5

Berner - 5

Dyer - 5

Fryatt - 9

Howard - 8

Subs:

Davies - 6

Powell - 6

Posted
King - 4. Far more ego than effort. No goal to rescue his performance today.

Bu the BBC do credit him with an assist for our winner though! :D

I don't actually recall details of the build up so can't confirm it or otherwise.

Nor do I think it would have made his performance any better than a five.

However I can't see where the ego bit came into it. Perhaps you could explain?

When u next seeing ure bum chum King?

Posted

Martin 7 Good performance. Some good saves and some good safe catches. Looked to have injured his back, let's hope it isn't too bad.

Mattock 3 All the application of a player who is already half way out the door on his way to another club. Consistently out of position.

Tunchev 6 Saved by second half performance. 1st half was the worst I have seen him play for us.

Morrison 4 Really looked average.

Edworthy 5 Tried hard but outpaced almost all the time. This is a real weakness.

Dyer 3 Was he playing?

Berner 5 Distinctly average but perhaps a bit unlucky to be subbed.

King 3 absolutely shocking. Looked like a schoolboy totally out of his depth.

Adams 2 Huge disappointment. Had a chance today to make the place his own and totally fluffed it.

Howard 7 Another good effort. But we need both our strikers to at least look like they can score.

Fryatt 9.5 Excellent. 1st goal was pure class.

Davies 5 looked ok but no more.

Powell 3 Absolutely no improvement over Mattock.

Posted

If you went to the game, please post your ratings at www.player-ratings.com/rate.

I don't understand the extreme hostility to Adams' performance today. OK, it wasn't a 10/10 effort, but he worked hard (unlike most of the midfield and some of the defence), a decent proportion of his passes went to team-mates and he had an assist for the first goal. Looks a better option than Gradel at the moment, though Dyer-Berner-King-Oakley still looks the best option, injuries permitting...

Posted
I don't understand the extreme hostility to Adams' performance today. OK, it wasn't a 10/10 effort, but he worked hard (unlike most of the midfield and some of the defence), a decent proportion of his passes went to team-mates and he had an assist for the first goal. Looks a better option than Gradel at the moment, though Dyer-Berner-King-Oakley still looks the best option, injuries permitting...

I agree, Adams is a better option than Gradel. I actually thought he played really well today and most of his crosses were decent alot better quality than most we have seen this season. He has a good understanding with Fryatt. I thought he was one of our better players today

Martin - 7.5 Made some great saves

Edworthy - 6.5 Put in some good tackles

Morrsion - 6.5 Afew too many hoofballs but played quite well

Tunchev - 6 Not his best game

Mattock - 6 Doesn't seem interested to me

Adams - 7.5 Played really well, some great crosses

Berner - 6.5 Don't know why he was subbed had a steady game

King - 6 Please stop passing the ball back, pass it forward or run with it to create space

Dyer - 6 Didn't do alot today compared to normal

Fryatt - 9 Quality, really happy for him, he deserves his hat trick

Howard - 7 Wins most of the headers when defending, needs to score tho

Posted

Its funny looking at peoples ratings having listened to the game and not seen it.

The radio suggested in the first half only Fryatt and Adams could take any credit from the performance

and in the second half morrison the pick of the defence and Martin in goal!!!

I then read FT and everyone says Howard, Fryatt and Martin, with people berating Adams, Mattock and Morrison.

Who to believe. :unsure:

Posted
lol

I can't recall one "great" cross. That's because there weren't any.

I have to disagree i think he did put some decent (fair enough maybe not great) crosses in the box

Posted

Ultra, your rating of Howard is laughable. Seriously, you think Dyer was twice as good as Steve?

Howard was the second best player on the park today after Fryatt.

Posted

Ultra, how on earth did Steve Howard only get a 3? What should have he had done differnetly?

Thats actually a joke.

Posted
Fryatt - 2 - Useless, get rid.

Least someone is talking sense.

Three goals I know, but what the **** did he contribute to the team?

Did he charge down the ball at every chance? No

Where was he winning headers against the big centre half? Nowhere.

If we get the chance, sell.

Posted
Howard - 3. Yet another p!sspoor performance against 4th div opposition. Nigel, get rid.

Yeah, get rid Nigel.

Ultra, he da man.

Posted

Fives across the board apart from Howard and Fryatt.

All in all a shockingly poor defensive display, approached in the manner of a pre-season friendly.

C'mon Histon! C'mon you Poppies!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...