Part Of The Crowd Posted 22 February 2009 Posted 22 February 2009 :laugh: so if another team formed by say people like maddog claimed the history of LCFC you'd be happy for that to continue
Floating Fox Posted 22 February 2009 Posted 22 February 2009 so if another team formed by say people like maddog claimed the history of LCFC you'd be happy for that to continue
Shrenchel Posted 22 February 2009 Posted 22 February 2009 so if another team formed by say people like maddog claimed the history of LCFC you'd be happy for that to continue To be honest mate if the mk situation had happened to leicester I think everyone on this forum would now be supporting AFC Leicester now, so theyd be quite happy for them to claim the history of lcfc rather than the lads 70 miles up the road. I doubt we'd all be sitting at home on a saturday muttering about how afc leicester technically aren't leicester city so shouldn't make any claims to our history. I find your latest tirades a bit odd geez. Personally consider MK dons is fooking horrible clubs but thought at least their fans seem to show afc wimbledon a bit of respect. Suprised to find so much anger towards them for apparently having turned football against you. Really shouldnt blame them for that mate. Its in the very fundamentals of your club.
Guest nathan. Posted 22 February 2009 Posted 22 February 2009 To be honest mate if the mk situation had happened to leicester I think everyone on this forum would now be supporting AFC Leicester now, so theyd be quite happy for them to claim the history of lcfc rather than the lads 70 miles up the road. I doubt we'd all be sitting at home on a saturday muttering about how afc leicester technically aren't leicester city so shouldn't make any claims to our history. I find your latest tirades a bit odd geez. Personally consider MK dons is fooking horrible clubs but thought at least their fans seem to show afc wimbledon a bit of respect. Suprised to find so much anger towards them for apparently having turned football against you. Really shouldnt blame them for that mate. Its in the very fundamentals of your club. Got a ring to it
Fosse Boy Posted 22 February 2009 Posted 22 February 2009 Got a ring to it I'd prefer Leicester Fosse 1884 or something like that. AFC seems to be the generic prefix for clubs who re-form nowadays.
Floating Fox Posted 22 February 2009 Posted 22 February 2009 I'd prefer Leicester Fosse 1884 or something like that. AFC seems to be the generic prefix for clubs who re-form nowadays. Got a few quid spare mate?
Guest nathan. Posted 22 February 2009 Posted 22 February 2009 I'd prefer Leicester Fosse 1884 or something like that. AFC seems to be the generic prefix for clubs who re-form nowadays. True, but coming up with songs that rym would be tricky
Fosse Boy Posted 22 February 2009 Posted 22 February 2009 Got a few quid spare mate? My next stoodent loan kicks in after Easter.
Fosse Boy Posted 22 February 2009 Posted 22 February 2009 True, but coming up with songs that rym would be tricky As we saw in the 'Heroes in Blue & White' song, 1884 rhymes with adore. Erm, Fosse rhymes with: toss dross cross Albatross The potential for songs is endless...
Part Of The Crowd Posted 23 February 2009 Posted 23 February 2009 To be honest mate if the mk situation had happened to leicester I think everyone on this forum would now be supporting AFC Leicester now, so theyd be quite happy for them to claim the history of lcfc rather than the lads 70 miles up the road. I doubt we'd all be sitting at home on a saturday muttering about how afc leicester technically aren't leicester city so shouldn't make any claims to our history. I find your latest tirades a bit odd geez. Personally consider MK dons is fooking horrible clubs but thought at least their fans seem to show afc wimbledon a bit of respect. Suprised to find so much anger towards them for apparently having turned football against you. Really shouldnt blame them for that mate. Its in the very fundamentals of your club. i wish them well for the ideal of it, dislike them for claiming the history i'm feeling rather ill at the moment so am overcomplicating what i am saying and losing the point along the way
lefox Posted 23 February 2009 Posted 23 February 2009 PREDICTOR Sorry MK dons.. I have you in a play off place in 3 weeks time.... better pull those socks up..
Guest Posted 23 February 2009 Posted 23 February 2009 They're working on their chants for us....... mostly crisp related it seems Linkage
Part Of The Crowd Posted 23 February 2009 Posted 23 February 2009 the moocamp is shit at songwriting, none will be used.
Raj Posted 23 February 2009 Posted 23 February 2009 I never said your a moron just because your a STH but Some ST holders are ******. "Perphaps not those words" . To be fair I've said lots of things, most of in anger after a home match, half the reason I don't go to them anymore. but even last tuesday night at Hartlepool there was a few idiots around that would be better off not supporting the club. I said before I understand that people have commitments, like families & Finances, but I also find it funny that when a big game comes around they can drop these commitments. :laugh: My Lord. I actually agree with something Standup says the moaning git!!! We DO have mongy ST holders. And some cretins who the Club should give life bans to. And i include myself in the way i can goto MKD and then claim family commitments for Hartlepool on a Tue night. Im still 'Ardcore you know!!!
Joe. Posted 23 February 2009 Posted 23 February 2009 http://www.moocamp.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=29358
CosbehFox Posted 23 February 2009 Posted 23 February 2009 http://www.moocamp.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=29358 They keep mentioning Jobber....I didn't see Jobber at Brizzle Rvrs...anyone else?
lildave3 Posted 23 February 2009 Posted 23 February 2009 They keep mentioning Jobber....I didn't see Jobber at Brizzle Rvrs...anyone else? Yeah, just behind and to the left of the FT gathering.
Corky Posted 23 February 2009 Posted 23 February 2009 They keep mentioning Jobber....I didn't see Jobber at Brizzle Rvrs...anyone else? Yes, he was in the middle of the terrace.
Thracian Posted 23 February 2009 Posted 23 February 2009 Yes, he was in the middle of the terrace. I saw him too. One of the stewards said he was concerned about possible subsidence!
Legend_in_blue Posted 23 February 2009 Posted 23 February 2009 Can somebody please explain how this thread has now generated a total of 12 pages? For such a small game, I'm quite surprised.
Part Of The Crowd Posted 24 February 2009 Posted 24 February 2009 how many other of you are in the south stand? poor choice there, keep your head down in that end, a fair few dicks there, also it is where the more 'hardcore' of the dons support gathers.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.