potter3 Posted 25 April 2009 Posted 25 April 2009 Now that's a decent kit That with no sponsor was basically what I thought this one would be like.
ACF Posted 25 April 2009 Posted 25 April 2009 I actually can't wait to get this kit! I think it looks rather nice. It looks like it'll be a nicer fitting in all so I reckon this kit will look better on me than the Jako one And oh my God that life size cardboard cut out of Oakley wearing the new kit in the shop!! I wanted to take it home with me. He looks bloody gorgeous in it! He's such a babe!! :laugh: :laugh:
Nick Posted 26 April 2009 Posted 26 April 2009 I like the new home kit. (I will be updating you all on other things I also like in the coming months)
jonw88 Posted 26 April 2009 Posted 26 April 2009 That with no sponsor was basically what I thought this one would be like. And with the Premier league badges on the arms
jockkkk Posted 26 April 2009 Posted 26 April 2009 I'm very picky about the womens shirt because it's too easy for me to look bloody horrendous in a shirt! I like this seasons because it's a v-neck but I'll still buy next seasons.
Rocky Dennis Posted 26 April 2009 Posted 26 April 2009 Not sure if anyone else has said this but I feel we've been conned!!! The whole 'no sponsor' thing always seemed like a PR stunt to please the fans, what weve actually got is a logo twice as big as the club badge, try and look at the shirt wothout your eye being drawn to the Joma logo!! Ive read somewhere that Joma beat off lots of competition to win the contract, a cynical mind might suggest that they offered us more money with the condition that a massive logo exists in the middle of the shirt? - which is the same as a shirt sponsor I reckon? I cannot think of anothre reason why such a large logo exists? No need whatsoever for it to be that big in my opinion!! I do quite like the shirt but think we've been swizzed a little!!!!!
Craig Posted 26 April 2009 Posted 26 April 2009 Not sure if anyone else has said this but I feel we've been conned!!!The whole 'no sponsor' thing always seemed like a PR stunt to please the fans, what weve actually got is a logo twice as big as the club badge, try and look at the shirt wothout your eye being drawn to the Joma logo!! Ive read somewhere that Joma beat off lots of competition to win the contract, a cynical mind might suggest that they offered us more money with the condition that a massive logo exists in the middle of the shirt? - which is the same as a shirt sponsor I reckon? I cannot think of anothre reason why such a large logo exists? No need whatsoever for it to be that big in my opinion!! I do quite like the shirt but think we've been swizzed a little!!!!! An absolute overreaction. The logo is nowhere near the same size as a shirt sponsor
Matt Posted 26 April 2009 Posted 26 April 2009 An absolute overreaction.The logo is nowhere near the same size as a shirt sponsor I agree, I think alot of people are overreacting about how big it is, I don't think it is much bigger than a normal logo on a football shirt - Certainly no where near 'as big as a sponsor'.
Jordan Posted 26 April 2009 Posted 26 April 2009 The shorts and socks are nice It could have done without that triangle-thing under the neck, but it's not as poor of an effort as it could have been. The long-sleeved version could be nice, but I'll probably hold off on buying any version because I don't really like wearing football shirts anymore.
Rocky Dennis Posted 26 April 2009 Posted 26 April 2009 An absolute overreaction.The logo is nowhere near the same size as a shirt sponsor Didnt say it was the same size as a shirt sponsor, I meant having a large manufacturers logo so prominent in the shirt is the same as a shirt sponsor, Its still advertising for Joma and therefore in my opinion its the same thing
Matt Posted 26 April 2009 Posted 26 April 2009 Didnt say it was the same size as a shirt sponsor, I meant having a large manufacturers logo so prominent in the shirt is the same as a shirt sponsor, Its still advertising for Joma and therefore in my opinion its the same thing So we have had two sponsors on this season's shirt? Jako and Topps Tiles? Every club had the kit makers name on the kit, why would the kit makers not put it on? What is the point you are trying to make?
AjcW Posted 26 April 2009 Posted 26 April 2009 http://www.lcfc.com/javaImages/47/2e/0,,10274~5779015,00.jpg Joma Logo ^^^ http://www.lcfc.com/javaImages/bd/85/0,,10274~3704253,00.jpg Jako Logo ^^^ If you moved that jako logo into the middle i doubt it would look any different. Overreaction here i feel. Also how similar does the neckline on jako away kit and our new joma home kit look
Rocky Dennis Posted 26 April 2009 Posted 26 April 2009 So we have had two sponsors on this season's shirt? Jako and Topps Tiles?Every club had the kit makers name on the kit, why would the kit makers not put it on? What is the point you are trying to make? Cheers for pointing that out I am aware every kit has makers name on it, im not an idiot. The point im trying to make (which is pretty clear i thought ) is that the logo is larger than usual, and in a very prominent position, and Im suggesting that maybe this gave Joma the upper-hand in the big battle to be our kit manufacturer? If you dont agree then fine, no need to reply with sarcy comments..
Samilktray Posted 26 April 2009 Posted 26 April 2009 Moaning about the word Joma being big. Theyve paid money for it to be there. Idiot. :laugh:
Rocky Dennis Posted 26 April 2009 Posted 26 April 2009 http://www.lcfc.com/javaImages/47/2e/0,,10274~5779015,00.jpgJoma Logo ^^^ http://www.lcfc.com/javaImages/bd/85/0,,10274~3704253,00.jpg Jako Logo ^^^ If you moved that jako logo into the middle i doubt it would look any different. Overreaction here i feel. Also how similar does the neckline on jako away kit and our new joma home kit look Difference being that the Jako logo is smaller and also nothing can tear you eyes away from that hideous topps tile logo, and this is my point. If there was a sponsor on the new shirt then the Joma logo wouldnt be as visible, my point is that your eyes are immediately drawn to the Joma logo just as they are to Mr Tile Man and therefore it is being marketed in the same way as a shirt sponsor.
lavrentis Posted 26 April 2009 Posted 26 April 2009 To be honest the new shirt has grown on me, I'll just wait till I bought it whether its £40's worth of material.
Rocky Dennis Posted 26 April 2009 Posted 26 April 2009 Moaning about the word Joma being big.Theyve paid money for it to be there. Idiot. :laugh: Your stinging reply technically agrees with my original point Of course theyve paid for it to be there, I bet you they offered far more money than any other manufacturer to put it there and at that size, that is my point. idiot
Samilktray Posted 26 April 2009 Posted 26 April 2009 Your stinging reply technically agrees with my original point Of course theyve paid for it to be there, I bet you they offered far more money than any other manufacturer to put it there and at that size, that is my point. idiot Your moaning over nothing really.
Miquel The Work Geordie Posted 26 April 2009 Posted 26 April 2009 I don't even think the Joma is that big.
Craig Posted 26 April 2009 Posted 26 April 2009 Difference being that the Jako logo is smaller and also nothing can tear you eyes away from that hideous topps tile logo, and this is my point.If there was a sponsor on the new shirt then the Joma logo wouldnt be as visible, my point is that your eyes are immediately drawn to the Joma logo just as they are to Mr Tile Man and therefore it is being marketed in the same way as a shirt sponsor. No it isn't. Also, after looking at my current shirt and the picture below, i'm sure that the manufacturers logo to club badge (not including the pathetic shield on the current shirt) ratio is larger on the current shirt than the new one.
Rocky Dennis Posted 26 April 2009 Posted 26 April 2009 Your moaning over nothing really. Not moaning at all pal, just an observation. Couldnt give a toss whether anyone agrees, no need for insults tho
Ozwin Posted 26 April 2009 Posted 26 April 2009 Who cares. At least it's not a massive 'Adudis' brand or something nobody's heard of. Joma is a decent brand, and it's fine.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.