Corky Posted 6 August 2010 Posted 6 August 2010 At least Jack Hobbs looks enthralled by the whole thing.
MC Prussian Posted 6 August 2010 Posted 6 August 2010 The "new" away kit does benefit hugely with the sponsor printed on it. Makes it look much more saleable. I like it, and that's the big surprise. As for the home shirt - it does make it appear a bit odd with the kit sponsor logo now being too close to the club crest. All in all, we could've done a LOT worse than King Power.
GUJJIFOX Posted 6 August 2010 Posted 6 August 2010 going to have to see what they look like in the flesh as the photo is photoshopped, agree with others on the home shirt, the sponser doesn't quite look right with the badge and kit makers in the middle. Maybe the 'K' should have been a little smaller but that was never going to happen
MPH Posted 6 August 2010 Posted 6 August 2010 forgive me if this has already been mentioned, and i am sure it has, but why is the club badge central on the home top and to the side on the away top?
unreachable Posted 6 August 2010 Posted 6 August 2010 Perfect having an unknown name and logo - walkers crisps and topps tiles were embarrassing to emblazon on your chest - now we can advertise a name and logo most people had to Google
Yojoe36 Posted 6 August 2010 Posted 6 August 2010 at Watford's shirt. Burrda is on the front TWICE. One in small and the other fills the shirt. Looks awful
demon_dog Posted 6 August 2010 Posted 6 August 2010 Fully agree with an earlier post. Replace the K with a 4. 4 King Power sounds good to me. Scare the opposition shitless. Hope the duty free is sold at half time !
Narborough_fox Posted 6 August 2010 Posted 6 August 2010 Keeping my kit sponsor less no question for me.
Ozwin Posted 6 August 2010 Posted 6 August 2010 If the Burrda and badge were on the left and right respectively then it'd look great but it looks all crowded now. The away shirt looks good though.
SeCrEt FoX Posted 6 August 2010 Posted 6 August 2010 Do you think Andy King's new goal celebration is going to be pointing at the sponsor and nodding his head with a smerk on his chops?
m00nie Posted 7 August 2010 Posted 7 August 2010 Bet they remove the sponsor less ones now if they haven't allrready.. knew shoulda picked one up sooner . Away don't look too bad but she the home one looks way to much..
wurmer Posted 7 August 2010 Posted 7 August 2010 It could have been a LOT worse, and personally am fine with it. Agree it's not sheer brilliance, but at least it's not bloody walkers or tops tiles or something equally shite. But let's face it, won't care what we wear if and when we get promoted! Gonna pick one up today.
Dan Posted 8 August 2010 Posted 8 August 2010 Not being funny but that home kit is fvcking vile. The away one is nice because of the positioning of the badge and kit manufacturer, but having them all in one central aligned block looks abysmal.
Bryn Posted 8 August 2010 Posted 8 August 2010 New sponsor looks really good on the away shirt actually. Design of the home kit is all wrong, why have they not put the badge and designer logo across from each other?
Alexikokopops Posted 9 August 2010 Posted 9 August 2010 I decided to like King Power on Facebook, and now have pictures of bread shoes appearing in my News Feed
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.