Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Guest Col city fan

The Beckford Saga

Should Jermaine go?  

223 members have voted

  1. 1. Should Pearson offload Jermaine

    • Yes, he's not good enough
    • No, he's great
    • No, but he shouldn't be in the starting 11


Recommended Posts

Posted

Couldn't vote, wasn't the right option. Beckford is a goalscorer and should be played as one. With the right partner doing the donkey work up front (Futacs), all he has to concentrate on is being in the right place at the right time and could be lethal. Playing him alongside another goalscorer just doesn't work unless they're allowed to run at a defence, such as a counterattack. Faced with a packed defence and forced to turn his back to goal and play a target mans role, a goalscorer is generally useless. Keep him if we're intending to play him alongside Futacs

Posted

Get rid ,not good enough he isn't a team player and the way nugent and vardy worked against hinckley I would defo start them two instead of nuge and becks !beckfords positioning was always poor last season and he was never willing to work for the ball !! Waist of money in my mind

Are you high?

You cant analyse Vardy and Nugent's partnership when playing Hinckley United. I think I would link up well with Nugent/Vardy against them. No disrespect but they're hardly championship level.

Beckford also looked very sharp in the training session at the king power.

Posted

Don't like any of the answers and I have a feeling you are very aware of the options you gave.

I (like a fair few others I suspect) don't think he's great but I do think we should keep hold of him and I do think he should be given this season. If it's disappointing then I'll be happy to say goodbye.

Guest shearfox
Posted

Seems the overwhelming majority realise what he offers which is good to see, I certainly wouldn't think about offloading him.

Posted

I wonder what result this poll would have had only at the beginning of last season and whether the options would have been different. Jus sayin :ph34r:

What, you mean before he played for us?

Posted

What, you mean before he played for us?

Jus saying people make their minds up before players kick a ball, and then others spend the majority of their time saying how shit a player is throughout the season. It'd be good comparable data. Jus sayin.

Posted

Is it any different to the views on Mills, king, Wellens, Gallagher, Dyer etc,etc there's always been players that have managed. to cover the widest range of opinions.

Can't see the issue myself.

How about - No he's good enough play him when the tactics/team make up suit his game.

Posted

Jus saying people make their minds up before players kick a ball, and then others spend the majority of their time saying how shit a player is throughout the season. It'd be good comparable data. Jus sayin.

Oh right, I get you know, Jus abou.

Guest Col city fan
Posted

Oh right, I get you know, Jus abou.

What will the grammar nazis make of that!?

lol

Posted

General perception most people have I could be wrong here is that Beckford is lazy i.e doesn't run around a lot, show pashuuuun aka Steeeve Howard, scoring 15 goals is that the marker of a shit player? or one to sell? not in my eyes I think we need to keep Beckford and see what he can do this season.

Generally he started most games last season when he was here, managing 9 league goals. Waghorn came off the bench quite a few times during his first year but managed 12 league goals that season. Beckford/Nugent didn't work as a partnership at all last year so starting with the same front line would be a real mistake and as Nugent out-performed Beckford last year he should get the go ahead. Lets not forget that Beckford is probably on about 3x as much as Vardy/Waghorn/Futacs, he's the most expensive, and he's a lot more expendable than Nugent.

Posted

Came across this thing on the BBC the other day called the Pareto Principle.

Basically it says that 20% of something usually is responsible for 80% of something. For instance, 20% of people in a workforce do 80% of the work. Or, 20% of customers create 80% of profits.

A more detailed explanation is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_principle

My reason for bring this up is I get the impression that the vast majority of Leicester fans dislike Jermaine Beckford, but if you look at the poll result, 80% think he is great.

So, 20% of Foxestalkers do 80% of the moaning!

lol:P

Guest Col city fan
Posted

Generally he started most games last season when he was here, managing 9 league goals. Waghorn came off the bench quite a few times during his first year but managed 12 league goals that season. Beckford/Nugent didn't work as a partnership at all last year so starting with the same front line would be a real mistake and as Nugent out-performed Beckford last year he should get the go ahead. Lets not forget that Beckford is probably on about 3x as much as Vardy/Waghorn/Futacs, he's the most expensive, and he's a lot more expendable than Nugent.

I thought it was 7 league goals?

You are right about the Nugent/Beckford thing.. The stats don't suggest that they had anything like a partnership going on... Neither of them got many assists throughout the season although I do think some of Beckford's runs helped Nuge find the space to score some of his goals.

I think the acid test is this.... Pearson has demonstrated that he wants to bring the wage bill down. I think that's indisputable. Beckford allegedly has now become the clubs best paid player, possibly by a significant amount. Will Pearson therefore choose to keep him and NOT play him?

In a logical world you surely play your best paid player as often as you can because that player should actually be one of your best players.

This would suggest that if we don't hear that Pearson wants to offload Jermaine, it will probably mean he intends to play him.

Posted

I really don't think he's worth his £25k a week (or thereabouts). Maybe he'll do a lot better playing alongside a target man like Futacs, but that would mean dropping Nugent, which wouldn't be a good idea. For the money he's on, he has to start, and I don't think he's good enough to be guaranteed a place in the team every match. I honestly don't think he's much better than Waghorn, and freeing up JB's wages would allow us to really strengthen the squad.

If he does stay, I expect a big improvement from him this season over last season.

And the rest.

Posted

I thought it was 7 league goals?

Yeah, sorry.

:(

It must have been 9 as I said, just scored in 7 games.

Posted

Beckford scored 9 league goals (Watford, Palace, Middlesbrough, Coventry, 2 v Birmingham, 2 v Blackpool, West Ham).

Guest Col city fan
Posted

Beckford scored 9 league goals (Watford, Palace, Middlesbrough, Coventry, 2 v Birmingham, 2 v Blackpool, West Ham).

I do apologise, 9 goals in 39 appearances..

Posted

I wonder how many more threads there are going to be about Beckford, we've been through and through this before and you think peoples opinions will change overnight? It's just the same re-hashed shit from Col City who always seems to be at the centre of the debate in a Beckford thread.

Judging by the poles your 'The forum still appears to be split on the subject of Beckford' its clerly you and a minority that feels this way. if you look at his record he can clearly score goals and a lot of them. give the guy a chance.

Posted

Judging by the poles your 'The forum still appears to be split on the subject of Beckford' its clerly you and a minority that feels this way. if you look at his record he can clearly score goals and a lot of them. give the guy a chance.

Maybe some sort of poll on a Leicester forum would be a better test than asking a bunch of Polish people?

Guest Col city fan
Posted

I wonder how many more threads there are going to be about Beckford, we've been through and through this before and you think peoples opinions will change overnight? It's just the same re-hashed shit from Col City who always seems to be at the centre of the debate in a Beckford thread.

Judging by the poles your 'The forum still appears to be split on the subject of Beckford' its clerly you and a minority that feels this way. if you look at his record he can clearly score goals and a lot of them. give the guy a chance.

Who shit on your cornflakes?

Chill yer boots and look up.

I'm more than happy to give the bloke another chance.

As are most people who voted it would appear.

There is no harm in asking in a poll.

Maybe some sort of poll on a Leicester forum would be a better test than asking a bunch of Polish people?

lol

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...