Mark_w Posted 9 February 2013 Posted 9 February 2013 Based on today, neither are good enough long-term. Based on today, Nigel Pearson isn't good enough sack him. Based on today, we're relegation candidates panic. Based on today, pretty much all of our players aren't good enough, get rid. If you think neither are good enough based on their long term performances then that's fine and I have no problem with people saying that. But basing it on their performances in a single match, where the whole team was below par, is stupid.
ian the fox Posted 9 February 2013 Posted 9 February 2013 Bring back goal king Jermaine Beckford , walking around doing f*** all
Danny the Fox 95 Posted 9 February 2013 Posted 9 February 2013 Neither of them good enough for a team challenging for promotion. Would rather have Vardy than Waghorn though.
Corky Posted 9 February 2013 Posted 9 February 2013 Based on today, Nigel Pearson isn't good enough sack him. Based on today, we're relegation candidates panic. Based on today, pretty much all of our players aren't good enough, get rid. If you think neither are good enough based on their long term performances then that's fine and I have no problem with people saying that. But basing it on their performances in a single match, where the whole team was below par, is stupid. I pointed out "today" because, with Wood out indefinitely, they had a real chance to stake a claim to be first choice. That should be the motivation. And neither took it. Maybe the pressure of replacing Wood got to them?
Happy Fox Posted 9 February 2013 Posted 9 February 2013 They have never been the required standard to start and perform to the required standards, nothing against Vardy and Waghorn but if they are starting for us you can forget about them making an impact we truly did miss Wood's presence and will continue to do so until he is back in the starting 11.
z-layrex Posted 9 February 2013 Posted 9 February 2013 Both fairly useless, but Waghorn has time on his side. ^
ian the fox Posted 9 February 2013 Posted 9 February 2013 Neither of them good enough for a team challenging for promotion. Would rather have Vardy than Waghorn though. they are in a team (squad) challenging for promotion , so your statement is 100% incorrect
ibbosuk Posted 9 February 2013 Posted 9 February 2013 none they are not good enough to be considered, and if Pearson keeps fvcking picking them there's a good chance it'll cost him his job.
ian the fox Posted 9 February 2013 Posted 9 February 2013 none they are not good enough to be considered, and if Pearson keeps fvcking picking them there's a good chance it'll cost him his job. lol lol lol lol lol
Manwell Pablo Posted 9 February 2013 Posted 9 February 2013 Based on today, Nigel Pearson isn't good enough sack him. Based on today, we're relegation candidates panic. Based on today, pretty much all of our players aren't good enough, get rid. If you think neither are good enough based on their long term performances then that's fine and I have no problem with people saying that. But basing it on their performances in a single match, where the whole team was below par, is stupid. Funny, you've had a problem with it all season so why have you stopped now. March is nearly here!
Manwell Pablo Posted 9 February 2013 Posted 9 February 2013 lol lol lol lol lol Ignore him, he's the biggest idiot on here. I include Ultra in that so that's some statement. (Not you Ian I should add the person you were laughing at )
Hugo Sanchez Posted 10 February 2013 Posted 10 February 2013 Need to loan someone quick. Both are cack and hes not gonna play futac anytime soon. Pearson is a stubbon twat though So he'll keep playing vardy.
Dan Posted 10 February 2013 Posted 10 February 2013 Waghorn. Don't think either are good enough though sadly.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.