Vardy Or Waghorn

[Mark_w]

Based on today, neither are good enough long-term.

Based on today, Nigel Pearson isn't good enough sack him.

Based on today, we're relegation candidates panic.

Based on today, pretty much all of our players aren't good enough, get rid.

If you think neither are good enough based on their long term performances then that's fine and I have no problem with people saying that. But basing it on their performances in a single match, where the whole team was below par, is stupid.

[ian the fox]

Bring back goal king Jermaine Beckford , walking around doing f*** all

[Danny the Fox 95]

Neither of them good enough for a team challenging for promotion. Would rather have Vardy than Waghorn though.

[Corky]

Based on today, Nigel Pearson isn't good enough sack him.

Based on today, we're relegation candidates panic.

Based on today, pretty much all of our players aren't good enough, get rid.

If you think neither are good enough based on their long term performances then that's fine and I have no problem with people saying that. But basing it on their performances in a single match, where the whole team was below par, is stupid.

I pointed out "today" because, with Wood out indefinitely, they had a real chance to stake a claim to be first choice. That should be the motivation. And neither took it.

Maybe the pressure of replacing Wood got to them?

[Happy Fox]

They have never been the required standard to start and perform to the required standards, nothing against Vardy and Waghorn but if they are starting for us you can forget about them making an impact we truly did miss Wood's presence and will continue to do so until he is back in the starting 11.

[z-layrex]

Both fairly useless, but Waghorn has time on his side.

^

[ian the fox]

Neither of them good enough for a team challenging for promotion. Would rather have Vardy than Waghorn though.

they are in a team (squad) challenging for promotion , so your statement is 100% incorrect

[ibbosuk]

none they are not good enough to be considered, and if Pearson keeps fvcking picking them there's a good chance it'll cost him his job.

[ian the fox]

none they are not good enough to be considered, and if Pearson keeps fvcking picking them there's a good chance it'll cost him his job.

lol lol lol lol lol

[LCFC_FAN_1995]

Futacs.

[Bob Weasel Fox]

Waggy

[Manwell Pablo]

Based on today, Nigel Pearson isn't good enough sack him.

Based on today, we're relegation candidates panic.

Based on today, pretty much all of our players aren't good enough, get rid.

If you think neither are good enough based on their long term performances then that's fine and I have no problem with people saying that. But basing it on their performances in a single match, where the whole team was below par, is stupid.

Funny, you've had a problem with it all season so why have you stopped now. March is nearly here!

[Manwell Pablo]

lol lol lol lol lol

Ignore him, he's the biggest idiot on here. I include Ultra in that so that's some statement. (Not you Ian I should add the person you were laughing at )

[Leicester_Loyal]

Both are truly dogshite.

[Charl91]

Even Beckfords record is better than Vardys.

[Hugo Sanchez]

Need to loan someone quick. Both are cack and hes not gonna play futac anytime soon. Pearson is a stubbon twat though

So he'll keep playing vardy.

[Dan LCFC]

Waghorn. Don't think either are good enough though sadly.

[Grewks]

Hopper.