dayday Posted 12 May 2013 Share Posted 12 May 2013 These two players have came in for a lot of stick,yet regardless of how many chances we missed...when either were played we created a lot more chances...has that been part of our downfall since January? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted 12 May 2013 Share Posted 12 May 2013 I'd keep Waghorn (Although rumour had it he's left, according to Shitter of course - I've not heard anymore, so not sure if it's true or not). As for Vardy I was prepared to just let him go on loan to a league one team but I've seen enough and wouldn't be sad to see him go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corky Posted 12 May 2013 Share Posted 12 May 2013 Vardy played a lot in our early-season run to the top. Waghorn contributed around November/December when we were still well in contention. They've taken a lot of criticism but as St Ledger is praised so highly for his contribution next to Morgan, maybe these guys deserve some credit too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monsell1976 Posted 12 May 2013 Share Posted 12 May 2013 Both had chances neither took them, goodbye to both in the summer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fox92 Posted 12 May 2013 Share Posted 12 May 2013 Get rid of Waghorn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dickov22 Posted 12 May 2013 Share Posted 12 May 2013 Keep Vardy get rid of Waghorn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bayfox Posted 12 May 2013 Share Posted 12 May 2013 Waghorn must have shagged pearsons mum to be behind kane in the pecking order. I'm convinced had waghorn had the minutes on the pitch that kane has had. He may have scored a goal or 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Father Ted Posted 12 May 2013 Share Posted 12 May 2013 Vardy played a lot in our early-season run to the top. Waghorn contributed around November/December when we were still well in contention. They've taken a lot of criticism but as St Ledger is praised so highly for his contribution next to Morgan, maybe these guys deserve some credit too? EXACTLY But no, we bring in Kane who has been as useful as a broken condom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Col city fan Posted 12 May 2013 Share Posted 12 May 2013 EXACTLY But no, we bring in Kane who has been as useful as a broken condom. Spot on.. Any idea why? I usually pride myself on being able to predict what Nige will do and the type of players he signs... But Kane? That one's left me confused. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RowlattsFox Posted 12 May 2013 Share Posted 12 May 2013 So we had weeks of slagging vardy off for being shit and now complaining he's not played in the run in instead of Kane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dayday Posted 12 May 2013 Author Share Posted 12 May 2013 So we had weeks of slagging vardy off for being shit and now complaining he's not played in the run in instead of Kane. My point has nothing to do about missing chances,its the type of player that has replaced Vardy and Waghorn...did we really need a target man type player..evidently not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Night Air Posted 12 May 2013 Share Posted 12 May 2013 Waghorn didn't deserve to be treated like he was been, wouldn't be surprised if he leaves but a big loss, a young player who has potential, remember that Derby game earlier in the season, my man of the match. Such a shame, one of my issues with Pearson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnglishOxide Posted 12 May 2013 Share Posted 12 May 2013 Waghorn has had years to prove how good he is and has not cut the mustard. Vardy was instrumental in our early season form. He missed a few chances but his all round play was impressive. He deserves another crack at it. Get rid of Futacs, Kane and Waghorn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the-blue-wildabeast Posted 12 May 2013 Share Posted 12 May 2013 Waghorn will become a good player for someone else, he is far better than Vardy, but got half the chances he got. Pearson is too stubborn to get rid of Vardy, that would be admitting he made a mistake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Father Ted Posted 12 May 2013 Share Posted 12 May 2013 So we had weeks of slagging vardy off for being shit and now complaining he's not played in the run in instead of Kane. I have said this all along and people laughed at me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gubbins Posted 12 May 2013 Share Posted 12 May 2013 We created a lot more chances with these two in the team... but the fact that so many of the chances fell to them meant we still scored around the same amount that we do without them! Get rid! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maccy_96 Posted 12 May 2013 Share Posted 12 May 2013 Kane has a clause in his loan deal that says he has to play minutes for every game he is available for Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Langston Posted 12 May 2013 Share Posted 12 May 2013 I'm going to sound like a huge ming-disabled for saying this - but I thought Vardy offered a fair bit through his "running about alot." In the sense that his early season form had him darting around, being a pest - his finishing needed sharpening up but that was always to be expected, wasn't it? He was never going to hit any sort of form after a series of niggling injuries and fifteen minute cameos once we started chopping and changing up top. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Langley Posted 12 May 2013 Share Posted 12 May 2013 EXACTLY But no, we bring in Kane who has been as useful as a broken condom. He turned the Watford game on it's head (thursday) and the previous one too in the league. Still think he's shite though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.