Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Guest MattP
Posted

It was deliberate. MSOH. :)

Never heard MSOH what is it? :D

Posted

You don't need to be told how averages work, surely.

 

 

Nope, but when bonus payments are excluded from the figures, wages rose by 1.4%, still below the rate of inflation, I believe that's an important point to make especially as most employed people don't receieve bonuses.

 

That's not to say it's not encouraging news.

Posted

Nope, but when bonus payments are excluded from the figures, wages rose by 1.4%, still below the rate of inflation, I believe that's an important point to make especially as most employed people don't receieve bonuses.

That's not to say it's not encouraging news.

The average bonus includes people who don't get a bonus, so why would you exclude it? That's like excluding pay rises from wage inflation figures on the basis that not everyone gets a pay rise. It totally defeats the object.

Guest MattP
Posted (edited)

Take a bow Alf that is absolutely fantastic! lol

Edited by MattP
Guest MattP
Posted

I'm not a fan of the Sun and don't read it but as a Tory voter in 2015 it is important to have them on side and I think it's quite clear who they will be backing.

 

Quite significent as well as for the first time in my life they will be backing a party who are behind in the polls (albeit now only 3-4% down rather than 10-12% a year back).

 

 

BlaQ_PfCMAEXbdH.jpg

Posted

I'm not a fan of the Sun and don't read it but as a Tory voter in 2015 it is important to have them on side and I think it's quite clear who they will be backing.

 

Quite significent as well as for the first time in my life they will be backing a party who are behind in the polls (albeit now only 3-4% down rather than 10-12% a year back).

 

 

BlaQ_PfCMAEXbdH.jpg

 

Interesting, but inconclusive, I'd say.

 

Certainly, the Sun would only ever back Labour if Murdoch thought that was the dominant view of the nation (e.g. under Blair), which it's not (yet). However, I heard that it had been quite favourable to UKIP (and even the SNP) in recent months.

 

For me, the key paragraph is: "[The Tory Party must focus] on setting out a bold, tax-cutting agenda as the centrepiece of its re-election drive" (the 2 previous paragraphs are just sops to readers in struggling Northern areas or with unemployed kids etc.). That reads like something of an ultimatum to me.....so expect Osborne to make tax cuts (income tax and/or corporation tax?) in the pre-election budget.

 

Whether Murdoch will be so pro-Tory if UKIP does exceptionally well in the Euro elections and/or Joe Public isn't showing the Tories any appreciation for the state of the economy, I don't know... Election still far too close to call, I'd say.

Posted

Just looking at the data from yesterday's ONS release, some interesting stats on job vacancies. Pretty much every sector has seen vacancies up massively over the last year. We really are at the point where anyone who wants a job can get one now. I reckon even leicsmac would have got himself a decent graduate engineering position if he hadn't have been so keen to get back on a few Korean chicks.

Posted (edited)

Just looking at the data from yesterday's ONS release, some interesting stats on job vacancies. Pretty much every sector has seen vacancies up massively over the last year. We really are at the point where anyone who wants a job can get one now. I reckon even leicsmac would have got himself a decent graduate engineering position if he hadn't have been so keen to get back on a few Korean chicks.

Out of money, out of moves last October Moosey my friend. Still, with what you and Matt are piping over all frequencies I'm hopeful for when I return in a few months with a bit of money to keep me going. That's one thing this job is good for. Besides, I thought you'd be happy with a guy finding work rather than being a drain on the taxpayer. ;-)

As for the Korean birds...I think I've said to you before, not really my thing, too much baggage. The expat American/South African/Ozzie ladies...That's a different matter entirely.

Edited by leicsmac
Guest MattP
Posted

Interesting, but inconclusive, I'd say.

 

Certainly, the Sun would only ever back Labour if Murdoch thought that was the dominant view of the nation (e.g. under Blair), which it's not (yet). However, I heard that it had been quite favourable to UKIP (and even the SNP) in recent months.

 

For me, the key paragraph is: "[The Tory Party must focus] on setting out a bold, tax-cutting agenda as the centrepiece of its re-election drive" (the 2 previous paragraphs are just sops to readers in struggling Northern areas or with unemployed kids etc.). That reads like something of an ultimatum to me.....so expect Osborne to make tax cuts (income tax and/or corporation tax?) in the pre-election budget.

 

Whether Murdoch will be so pro-Tory if UKIP does exceptionally well in the Euro elections and/or Joe Public isn't showing the Tories any appreciation for the state of the economy, I don't know... Election still far too close to call, I'd say.

 

I don't think the Sun are coming across as pro-Tory from the things I have read, they certainly are very anti-Balls though and with the economy going to be the big issue is 2015 I can't see them supporting anything that could help the Labour party back to office.

 

As with 2010 Labour could be going into the election with only the Daily Mirror supporting it.

 

I think it's very possible The Sun will back UKIP in the European Elections next month though.

Posted

If you register as self employed you can claim about £20 less than JSA in benefits and tax credits. You may come out with less but it saves the hassle and aggravation of signing on at the job centre. Also it reduces the jobless figures. There has been an increase in self employed people.

Posted

If you register as self employed you can claim about £20 less than JSA in benefits and tax credits. You may come out with less but it saves the hassle and aggravation of signing on at the job centre. Also it reduces the jobless figures. There has been an increase in self employed people.

Add that to zero hour contracts and its clear nobody is working. Im suprised no one has noticed :o
Posted

If you register as self employed you can claim about £20 less than JSA in benefits and tax credits. You may come out with less but it saves the hassle and aggravation of signing on at the job centre. Also it reduces the jobless figures. There has been an increase in self employed people.

So all these people who are relying on foodbanks to survive are voluntarily giving up another £20 pw just to save them the bother of signing on and looking for work?

Posted

No they are looking for work but not being sanctioned and losing out for  the slightest mistake nd getting aggro from the job centre staff. the attitude of some may encourage people to work for cash in hand rather than sign on, Defeating the aim really. I know I would have done that if I could and used any spare time to look for work. I would be drawing money at least equal to JSA but not registered as unemployed. The main reason people use foodbanks is sanctions and late payments of benefits.

Posted

No they are looking for work but not being sanctioned and losing out for  the slightest mistake nd getting aggro from the job centre staff. the attitude of some may encourage people to work for cash in hand rather than sign on, Defeating the aim really. I know I would have done that if I could and used any spare time to look for work. I would be drawing money at least equal to JSA but not registered as unemployed. The main reason people use foodbanks is sanctions and late payments of benefits.

You can work cash in hand while you're signed on so that argument doesn't stack up.

 

If actually looking for work is too much of a hassle for some people then perhaps it's their fault they're unemployed and not the govt's?

Posted

No they are looking for work but not being sanctioned and losing out for the slightest mistake nd getting aggro from the job centre staff. the attitude of some may encourage people to work for cash in hand rather than sign on, Defeating the aim really. I know I would have done that if I could and used any spare time to look for work. I would be drawing money at least equal to JSA but not registered as unemployed. The main reason people use foodbanks is sanctions and late payments of benefits.

Don't you think they might have to fill in a tax return? which in my experience is quite a hassle, as you put it.
Guest MattP
Posted

Have you had a look at the job market recently yourself Ken?

So much about, you might surprise yourself and find something you like that pays well.

Posted

Have you had a look at the job market recently yourself Ken?

So much about, you might surprise yourself and find something you like that pays well.

There's too many gifs and memes to choose from for this post.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...