Unabomber Posted 20 February 2014 Posted 20 February 2014 Ban him from Greggs that will cut so much deeper.
CKB Posted 20 February 2014 Posted 20 February 2014 Andy Reid should be banned for being a fat cvnt, simple as....
Bert Posted 20 February 2014 Posted 20 February 2014 According to a guy at work,he should have walked for that arms raised with intent.Case closed then.Was this not similar to Norwich away( last Sousa game) with Fryatt and he walked.now that was a grim night and seems a long time ago. This however had nothing to do with Koncheskys tackle, totally different incident ,I know my eyes were hurting from those screens in the corner,but i wasn't surprised it was a red,I wouldn't moan about either decisions though. Fryatt who kicked Leon Barnett?
Callabinho Posted 21 February 2014 Posted 21 February 2014 If he did that during play he would be be sent off. Hate the fat **** anyway.
ozleicester Posted 21 February 2014 Posted 21 February 2014 So surely Kasper shouldn't have got another yellow... Still gutted by this game.. cvnts
sk3since03 Posted 21 February 2014 Posted 21 February 2014 Did Darlow get punished for his lunge on vardy at all
cambridgefox Posted 21 February 2014 Posted 21 February 2014 Fryatt who kicked Leon Barnett?Couldn't remember,I thought that was handbags at the time.Anyway I said the guy at work because he was a ref upto Championship level a few years back.Still does conference line and no it's not " my mates the ref" just thought he would know better than us so called experts.Some of the stories he tells are quite amusing,but this isn't the place to tell them.
Larry_LCFC Posted 21 February 2014 Posted 21 February 2014 Makes me laugh how the poison dwarf makes a big issue out of Morgans yellow. Didnt mention his thuggish players lashing out though did he. Hate forest more each day, not for being local, just for being cvnts.
MC Prussian Posted 21 February 2014 Posted 21 February 2014 If at all, I'd fine Reid for throwing punches and then make the other two, three Forest players (if they were) assisting pay a little bit less. Donate it to a good cause, whatever. It was a bit of a silly brawl and unsportsmanlike behavior. To me, it appears as if Phillips grabs the ball, ready to get back to the middle of the pitch. There was no need for getting the Forest handbags out. I'd reserve yellow cards or post-game suspensions for proper, clear and/or more vicious infringements.
Stadt Posted 21 February 2014 Posted 21 February 2014 That's ok thenNative Fox isn't native That's ok thenNative Fox isn't native
blueonyou Posted 21 February 2014 Posted 21 February 2014 It's hardly throwing punches. Football has become too soft. End of.
PaulW Posted 21 February 2014 Posted 21 February 2014 1. It has nothing to do with the Konchesky tackle. 2. It's handbags at best, if you really want to see players banned for things like that football isn't for you. 3. Phillips actually has no right to get the ball, it's Forest's after we score. Ref. number 3 on your list........would you like to enlighten me & quote the particular FA rule that makes that statement!?
cambridgefox Posted 21 February 2014 Posted 21 February 2014 1. It has nothing to do with the Konchesky tackle. 2. It's handbags at best, if you really want to see players banned for things like that football isn't for you. 3. Phillips actually has no right to get the ball, it's Forest's after we score. He pushed him. This stuff happens in the playground everyday. According to a guy at work,he should have walked for that arms raised with intent.Case closed then.Was this not similar to Norwich away( last Sousa game) with Fryatt and he walked.now that was a grim night and seems a long time ago. This however had nothing to do with Koncheskys tackle, totally different incident ,I know my eyes were hurting from those screens in the corner,but i wasn't surprised it was a red,I wouldn't moan about either decisions though. Ref. number 3 on your list........would you like to enlighten me & quote the particular FA rule that makes that statement!?Ref at work had a look on a better stream and said it was a yellow at best and also If issued to Reid most probably to Phillips for time wasting as Matt said,as it's not his right to get the ball.The FA are a tad more lenient this year regarding pushing unless above the shoulders and Reid would have been booked for " agressive attitude " Hope this clears things up in this storm in a tea cup saga.i don't really give a Sh!t,but big enough to admit I got things wrong.
fuchsntf Posted 21 February 2014 Posted 21 February 2014 Phillips was stopping them getting the ball back, basically time wasting. Which was retarded because the ref isn't going to re-start the game until we're back in our own half. I don't really understand why teams get particularly wound up about that. But, eh, Reid was provoked and Phillips got a shove. Seriously, this smacks of desperation. Wind your necks in. Phillip s was just picking up the ball, then Reid came flying in.Philips was not t i me wasting, and Reid wasnt provoked. You can make up stories but that Video, and a couple more from another angle, proves my statements...again.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.