Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
indierich06

Realistic signings now we are up... (and some unrealistic ones)

Recommended Posts

Posted

Fulham may have spunked £11m on McCormmack but they have also shifted 12 first team players off the wage bill 9 of which were probably on a fair whack.

Replacing a £50k p/w player with a £15k p/w saves about £1.75m per year. Presumably they think they could get at least £5m back next season worst case so I can see why they have a bit of a budget.

http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/fc-fulham/transfers/verein/931/saison_id/2014

McCormack was probably earning close to 30k at Leeds as the next highest earner, Paddy Kenny, was on 10k less that him. Fulham will have given him more as well so he could be on around 40k now anyway.
Posted

McCormack was probably earning close to 30k at Leeds as the next highest earner, Paddy Kenny, was on 10k less that him. Fulham will have given him more as well so he could be on around 40k now anyway.

You don't have a clue what you're talking about, do you?

Posted

Inter Milan want him, could be tricky!

Why would he want to go to fashionable warm Italy when he could be playing against Hull in the rain?

Posted

Why would he want to go to fashionable warm Italy when he could be playing against Hull in the rain?

lol To be fair he doesn't look the kind of guy who is massively into fashion or the way he looks... face like a bulldog licking piss off a thistle!

Posted

lol To be fair he doesn't look the kind of guy who is massively into fashion or the way he looks... face like a bulldog licking piss off a thistle!

Isn't his nickname pitbull anyway

Posted

Why would he want to go to fashionable warm Italy when he could be playing against Hull in the rain?

Have you been to Milan in the winter? :ph34r:

Posted

lol. must be on at least 50k p/w

Yes at chelsea. I'd say his days are numbered there so he may have to take a small wage cut. I think it's the sort of player we should be looking at despite the mandatory foxestalk laugh out loud reply
Posted

Yes at chelsea. I'd say his days are numbered there so he may have to take a small wage cut. I think it's the sort of player we should be looking at despite the mandatory foxestalk laugh out loud reply

This is the realistic signings thread. Sorry for the <lol> but I'd be especially surprised if all of a sudden we were linked with him, given his wages, unlikeihood of reducing those wages, and plenty of clubs who can afford his packet abroad.

Posted

This is the realistic signings thread. Sorry for the <lol> but I'd be especially surprised if all of a sudden we were linked with him, given his wages, unlikeihood of reducing those wages, and plenty of clubs who can afford his packet abroad.

Promoted teams can and do sign big players. Some big examples of it in recent seasons
Posted

Gaston Ramirez, Gary Medel, TTom Huddlestone etc

The first two are being paid a fortune and Tom Huddlestone isn't a big name.

Posted

You're not being serious right?

He's a great player don't get me wrong but not for a top four team imo

Also you've only picked up on that bit because I gave examples of big players signing for newly promoted teams when you didn't think I would.

Looking for an argument by any chance? lol

Anyway I give up

NEXT!

lol

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...