ROB-THE-BLUE Posted 14 January 2015 Posted 14 January 2015 According to Dyche on sky sports last night, Danny says he's staying, His team mates say he's staying, the chairman says he's staying, the board says he's staying, the fans say he's staying, the tea lady says he's staying, his wife says he's staying and most of burnley says he's staying.....Read into that what you want. Probably depends more on what £10m+ says
Banks Posted 14 January 2015 Posted 14 January 2015 great news for us if he leaves Burnley, it'll leave just 2 more relegation spots to fill. Us, QPR, Palace, Villa, Hull, Sunderland, or West Brom.
Wortho Posted 14 January 2015 Posted 14 January 2015 Ings is out of contract at the end of this season. Obviously, they won't get anything for him if he stays till then.
Finn Claw II Posted 14 January 2015 Posted 14 January 2015 Probably depends more on what £10m+ says Agreed - if they go down ings will be off, if they stay up inns will be off. If survival is worth an extra £60m it depends on the chances of staying up with or without him. £20m on 31st Jan would test their resolve. Liverpool love an overpriced striker...
yorkie1999 Posted 14 January 2015 Posted 14 January 2015 Ings is out of contract at the end of this season. Obviously, they won't get anything for him if he stays till then. I thought Burnley had the option on him because of his age.
Tielemans63 Posted 14 January 2015 Posted 14 January 2015 Us bidding is one thing but if Liverpool, Spurs or Man City make a serious bid in this window then he might not be quite as loyal as Burnley are saying he is. If we gained a goalscorer and Burnley lost one that would be an almost perfect transfer window for us
HitchinFox Posted 14 January 2015 Posted 14 January 2015 lets offer 15 million to just 'talk' to him Great plan. Give him a medical then send him back. Meanwhile, Burnley table a £20,000 bid to bring in James Gray from Accrington Stanley - but then have to withdraw the bid due to insufficient funds.
dsr-burnley Posted 15 January 2015 Posted 15 January 2015 Ings is out of contract at the end of this season. Obviously, they won't get anything for him if he stays till then. Under 24, so there's a tribunal fee. Burnley might be tempted by £15m, though I think it would need to be more. But clubs don't want to pay that much for a man out of contract in summer, and Ings doesn't want to sign for that money because (I presume) he wants some of it as a signing on fee. Also, selling him might just make the manager a bit cross. So fingers crossed he's staying.
Sir Fynwy Posted 15 January 2015 Posted 15 January 2015 Under 24, so there's a tribunal fee. Burnley might be tempted by £15m, though I think it would need to be more. But clubs don't want to pay that much for a man out of contract in summer, and Ings doesn't want to sign for that money because (I presume) he wants some of it as a signing on fee. Also, selling him might just make the manager a bit cross. So fingers crossed he's staying. Burnley bought him from Bournemouth in 2011, I'm not sure how tribunal fees apply in this case.
Guest MattP Posted 15 January 2015 Posted 15 January 2015 Under 24, so there's a tribunal fee. Burnley might be tempted by £15m, though I think it would need to be more. But clubs don't want to pay that much for a man out of contract in summer, and Ings doesn't want to sign for that money because (I presume) he wants some of it as a signing on fee. Also, selling him might just make the manager a bit cross. So fingers crossed he's staying. Often the key in these sort of things now. You can be looking at signing on fees of 3-4 million these days if a player is highly sought after by numerous clubs which far exceeds the 10% they are entitled to from a transfer fee.
Bryn Posted 15 January 2015 Posted 15 January 2015 No chance he leaves before the end of the season. Why would he? He stays til the end of the season, his public image goes through the roof and he gets a bumper pay day with a monstrous signing on fee at the end of the season.
GingerrrFox Posted 15 January 2015 Posted 15 January 2015 Burnley bought him from Bournemouth in 2011, I'm not sure how tribunal fees apply in this case. I am about 90% sure that as he isn't a player brought through from Burnley's academy that they will not receive a tribunal fee. However off the top of my head I can't ever remember this scenario occurring before as players usually leave their first registered clubs in this fashion at such a young age. It's termed a "development fee" and Burnley didn't develop him.
Bamba's Babes Posted 15 January 2015 Posted 15 January 2015 Under 24, so there's a tribunal fee. Burnley might be tempted by £15m, though I think it would need to be more. But clubs don't want to pay that much for a man out of contract in summer, and Ings doesn't want to sign for that money because (I presume) he wants some of it as a signing on fee. Also, selling him might just make the manager a bit cross. So fingers crossed he's staying. Who do you think he is, Andrej Kramaric?
dsr-burnley Posted 16 January 2015 Posted 16 January 2015 I am about 90% sure that as he isn't a player brought through from Burnley's academy that they will not receive a tribunal fee. However off the top of my head I can't ever remember this scenario occurring before as players usually leave their first registered clubs in this fashion at such a young age. It's termed a "development fee" and Burnley didn't develop him. Development fees are for transfers to non-English clubs, and are €90k per year for every year he's been at the club. Transfer tribunals are entriely different, a purely English affair, and work the same way as they did before Bosman, except that now it's only under-24s who get a fee. Tom Ince nearly went to a tribunal but Hull and Blackpool agreed a £2m fee on the morning that the tribunal was supposed to meet.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.