Claridge Posted 16 March 2015 Posted 16 March 2015 Vardy got the lowest marks for the hull game. He may have not played the correct ball on the odd occasion or been tackled but if he was the worst player then I I must be going blind. Does anyone agree with the Mercury?
AKCJ Posted 16 March 2015 Posted 16 March 2015 I thought he made Hull's right side look worse than their left, which takes some doing.
Bayfox Posted 16 March 2015 Posted 16 March 2015 Didn't see much of the ball but drove forward when he did. Esp 2nd half. I could name several worse. #captianmorgangoingdownwithhisship to name but one.
foxinsocks Posted 16 March 2015 Posted 16 March 2015 I can only think this is a dig at NP singling vardy out for praise - if the mercury don't like NP anymore then why not just say so?
peach0000 Posted 16 March 2015 Posted 16 March 2015 The daily mail had him as MOTM http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2994823/Leicester-City-0-0-Hull-City-Foxes-lose-ground-Premier-League-safety-Tom-Huddlestone-sees-red-stalemate.html
fleckneymike Posted 16 March 2015 Posted 16 March 2015 I thought he, along with the vast majority, had an incredibly ineffective game. He wasn't helped by the formation we played but non the less he wasn't very good.
greatman Posted 17 March 2015 Posted 17 March 2015 Worst player for me was kamaric just seemed out of sorts.thought morgan had his best game in a few months,vardy looked to be getting back some forum.schwartzer had a good game that save near the end was top draw very clam .
Bryn Posted 17 March 2015 Posted 17 March 2015 Vardy was ok. Nothing more. He played better than Kramaric and Mahrez.
Crinklyfox Posted 17 March 2015 Posted 17 March 2015 Vardy was almost alone in his desire to attack the Hull defence. If we had a few more with the same attitude we'd have caused them more problems. Can't agree with the Mercury.
Dickov22 Posted 17 March 2015 Posted 17 March 2015 They gave him a 7 out of 10 and most others a 6......
Claridge Posted 17 March 2015 Author Posted 17 March 2015 They gave him a 7 out of 10 and most others a 6...... Only gave him 5 and the rest 6s and 7s in my mercury. They gave cambiasso MOM and i thought he was poor,not enough simple balls always the killer pass which never came off
Guest Posted 17 March 2015 Posted 17 March 2015 They were bizarre ratings. Vardy did well second half and had them running scared for a ten minute period around the red card. Kramaric is just so far off the pace it's painful. Just should not have been on the pitch. Morgan needs a ten minute think whenever he gets the ball. Cambiasso was a class above again.
maxwelld_ Posted 18 March 2015 Posted 18 March 2015 Vardy was shocking vs hull . But when the gameplan is to launch balls up to him in the air and for your 10m striker to always be in midfield doing 1-2 passes with Cambiasso then your not going to get any support or have a good game .
Claridge Posted 18 March 2015 Author Posted 18 March 2015 Vardy was shocking vs hull . But when the gameplan is to launch balls up to him in the air and for your 10m striker to always be in midfield doing 1-2 passes with Cambiasso then your not going to get any support or have a good game . Second half he was good.Created a few chances for others,although if you gave Nugent an open goal from a foot he would still miss
blue army 1988 Posted 21 March 2015 Posted 21 March 2015 Just shows how varied people opinions are tbh
the messenger Posted 21 March 2015 Posted 21 March 2015 Rob tanner is has bad as biased bill anderson. Absolute rubbish football journalist stopped reading the sports report weeks ago
DANGEROUS TIGER Posted 22 March 2015 Posted 22 March 2015 Rob tanner is has bad as biased bill anderson. Absolute rubbish football journalist stopped reading the sports report weeks ago I have always found Bill Anderson, to be a very fair journalist, and an interesting read.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.